Literature DB >> 32275920

Assortative mating by population of origin in a mechanistic model of admixture.

Amy Goldberg1, Ananya Rastogi2, Noah A Rosenberg3.   

Abstract

Populations whose mating pairs have levels of similarity in phenotypes or genotypes that differ systematically from the level expected under random mating are described as experiencing assortative mating. Excess similarity in mating pairs is termed positive assortative mating, and excess dissimilarity is negative assortative mating. In humans, empirical studies suggest that mating pairs from various admixed populations - whose ancestry derives from two or more source populations - possess correlated ancestry components that indicate the occurrence of positive assortative mating on the basis of ancestry. Generalizing a two-sex mechanistic admixture model, we devise a model of one form of ancestry-assortative mating that occurs through preferential mating based on source population. Under the model, we study the moments of the admixture fraction distribution for different assumptions about mating preferences, including both positive and negative assortative mating by population. We demonstrate that whereas the mean admixture under assortative mating is equivalent to that of a corresponding randomly mating population, the variance of admixture depends on the level and direction of assortative mating. We consider two special cases of assortative mating by population: first, a single admixture event, and second, constant contributions to the admixed population over time. In contrast to standard settings in which positive assortment increases variation within a population, certain assortative mating scenarios allow the variance of admixture to decrease relative to a corresponding randomly mating population: with the three populations we consider, the variance-increasing effect of positive assortative mating within a population might be overwhelmed by a variance-decreasing effect emerging from mating preferences involving other pairs of populations. The effect of assortative mating is smaller on the X chromosome than on the autosomes because inheritance of the X in males depends only on the mother's ancestry, not on the mating pair. Because the variance of admixture is informative about the timing of admixture and possibly about sex-biased admixture contributions, the effects of assortative mating are important to consider in inferring features of population history from distributions of admixture values. Our model provides a framework to quantitatively study assortative mating under flexible scenarios of admixture over time.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Admixture; Assortative mating; Mechanistic models; X chromosome

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32275920      PMCID: PMC7387155          DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2020.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Popul Biol        ISSN: 0040-5809            Impact factor:   1.570


  33 in total

1.  Systems of Mating. III. Assortative Mating Based on Somatic Resemblance.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1921-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The Numerical Results of Diverse Systems of Breeding.

Authors:  H S Jennings
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1916-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Beyond clines: lineages and haplotype blocks in hybrid zones.

Authors:  Alisa Sedghifar; Yaniv Brandvain; Peter Ralph
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  The correlation between relatives under assortative malting for an X-linked and autosomal trait.

Authors:  H Risch
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  Assortative mating on complex traits revisited: Double first cousins and the X-chromosome.

Authors:  Loic Yengo; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Beyond 2/3 and 1/3: The Complex Signatures of Sex-Biased Admixture on the X Chromosome.

Authors:  Amy Goldberg; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Patterns of admixture and population structure in native populations of Northwest North America.

Authors:  Paul Verdu; Trevor J Pemberton; Romain Laurent; Brian M Kemp; Angelica Gonzalez-Oliver; Clara Gorodezky; Cris E Hughes; Milena R Shattuck; Barbara Petzelt; Joycelynn Mitchell; Harold Harry; Theresa William; Rosita Worl; Jerome S Cybulski; Noah A Rosenberg; Ripan S Malhi
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  The genetic ancestry of African Americans, Latinos, and European Americans across the United States.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bryc; Eric Y Durand; J Michael Macpherson; David Reich; Joanna L Mountain
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Reproductive isolation of hybrid populations driven by genetic incompatibilities.

Authors:  Molly Schumer; Rongfeng Cui; Gil G Rosenthal; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Length Distribution of Ancestral Tracks under a General Admixture Model and Its Applications in Population History Inference.

Authors:  Xumin Ni; Xiong Yang; Wei Guo; Kai Yuan; Ying Zhou; Zhiming Ma; Shuhua Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Why do we pick similar mates, or do we?

Authors:  Thomas M M Versluys; Ewan O Flintham; Alex Mas-Sandoval; Vincent Savolainen
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Assortative mating enhances postzygotic barriers to gene flow via ancestry bundling.

Authors:  Pavitra Muralidhar; Graham Coop; Carl Veller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Skin deep: The decoupling of genetic admixture levels from phenotypes that differed between source populations.

Authors:  Jaehee Kim; Michael D Edge; Amy Goldberg; Noah A Rosenberg
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 4.  Human genetic admixture through the lens of population genomics.

Authors:  Shyamalika Gopalan; Samuel Pattillo Smith; Katharine Korunes; Iman Hamid; Sohini Ramachandran; Amy Goldberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 6.671

5.  Sex-biased admixture and assortative mating shape genetic variation and influence demographic inference in admixed Cabo Verdeans.

Authors:  Katharine L Korunes; Giordano Bruno Soares-Souza; Katherine Bobrek; Hua Tang; Isabel Inês Araújo; Amy Goldberg; Sandra Beleza
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.542

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.