Literature DB >> 32275725

Potential greenhouse gas reductions from Natural Climate Solutions in Oregon, USA.

Rose A Graves1,2, Ryan D Haugo2, Andrés Holz3, Max Nielsen-Pincus4, Aaron Jones2, Bryce Kellogg2, Cathy Macdonald2, Kenneth Popper2, Michael Schindel2.   

Abstract

Increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs) are causing global climate change and decreasing the stability of the climate system. Long-term solutions to climate change will require reduction in GHG emissions as well as the removal of large quantities of GHGs from the atmosphere. Natural climate solutions (NCS), i.e., changes in land management, ecosystem restoration, and avoided conversion of habitats, have substantial potential to meet global and national greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets and contribute to the global drawdown of GHGs. However, the relative role of NCS to contribute to GHG reduction at subnational scales is not well known. We examined the potential for 12 NCS activities on natural and working lands in Oregon, USA to reduce GHG emissions in the context of the state's climate mitigation goals. We evaluated three alternative scenarios wherein NCS implementation increased across the applicable private or public land base, depending on the activity, and estimated the annual GHG reduction in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e) attributable to NCS from 2020 to 2050. We found that NCS within Oregon could contribute annual GHG emission reductions of 2.7 to 8.3 MMT CO2e by 2035 and 2.9 to 9.8 MMT CO2e by 2050. Changes in forest-based activities including deferred timber harvest, riparian reforestation, and replanting after wildfires contributed most to potential GHG reductions (76 to 94% of the overall annual reductions), followed by changes to agricultural management through no-till, cover crops, and nitrogen management (3 to 15% of overall annual reductions). GHG reduction benefits are relatively high per unit area for avoided conversion of forests (125-400 MT CO2e ha-1). However, the existing land use policy in Oregon limits the current geographic extent of active conversion of natural lands and thus, avoided conversions results in modest overall potential GHG reduction benefits (i.e., less than 5% of the overall annual reductions). Tidal wetland restoration, which has high per unit area carbon sequestration benefits (8.8 MT CO2e ha-1 yr-1), also has limited possible geographic extent resulting in low potential (< 1%) of state-level GHG reduction contributions. However, co-benefits such as improved habitat and water quality delivered by restoration NCS pathways are substantial. Ultimately, reducing GHG emissions and increasing carbon sequestration to combat climate change will require actions across multiple sectors. We demonstrate that the adoption of alternative land management practices on working lands and avoided conversion and restoration of native habitats can achieve meaningful state-level GHG reductions.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32275725      PMCID: PMC7147789          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  27 in total

1.  Successional changes in live and dead wood carbon stores: implications for net ecosystem productivity.

Authors:  J E Janisch; M E Harmon
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.196

2.  Ecosystem carbon loss with woody plant invasion of grasslands.

Authors:  Robert B Jackson; Jay L Banner; Esteban G Jobbágy; William T Pockman; Diana H Wall
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-08-08       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The potential role for management of U.S. public lands in greenhouse gas mitigation and climate policy.

Authors:  Lydia P Olander; David M Cooley; Christopher S Galik
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Forest fuel reduction alters fire severity and long-term carbon storage in three Pacific Northwest ecosystems.

Authors:  Stephen R Mitchell; Mark E Harmon; Kari E B O'Connell
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.657

5.  Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks.

Authors:  Sebastiaan Luyssaert; E-Detlef Schulze; Annett Börner; Alexander Knohl; Dominik Hessenmöller; Beverly E Law; Philippe Ciais; John Grace
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  High resolution modeling of agricultural nitrogen to identify private wells susceptible to nitrate contamination.

Authors:  Brendalynn Hoppe; Denis White; Anna Harding; George Mueller-Warrant; Bruce Hope; Eric Main
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.744

7.  Carbon sequestration in riparian forests: A global synthesis and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kristen E Dybala; Virginia Matzek; Thomas Gardali; Nathaniel E Seavy
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 10.863

8.  Fixing a snag in carbon emissions estimates from wildfires.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Stenzel; Kristina J Bartowitz; Melannie D Hartman; James A Lutz; Crystal A Kolden; Alistair M S Smith; Beverly E Law; Mark E Swanson; Andrew J Larson; William J Parton; Tara W Hudiburg
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 10.863

9.  Carbon Management Response curves: estimates of temporal soil carbon dynamics.

Authors:  Tristram O West; Gregg Marland; Anthony W King; Wilfred M Post; Atul K Jain; Kenneth Andrasko
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.266

10.  Land use strategies to mitigate climate change in carbon dense temperate forests.

Authors:  Beverly E Law; Tara W Hudiburg; Logan T Berner; Jeffrey J Kent; Polly C Buotte; Mark E Harmon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Correction: Potential greenhouse gas reductions from Natural Climate Solutions in Oregon, USA.

Authors: 
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Quantifying the effects of multiple land management practices, land cover change, and wildfire on the California landscape carbon budget with an empirical model.

Authors:  Alan V Di Vittorio; Maegen B Simmonds; Peter Nico
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Leveraging the potential of nature to meet net zero greenhouse gas emissions in Washington State.

Authors:  James C Robertson; Kristina V Randrup; Emily R Howe; Michael J Case; Phillip S Levin
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Nature-based cooling potential: a multi-type green infrastructure evaluation in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Vidya Anderson; William A Gough
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.787

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.