Literature DB >> 15453404

Carbon Management Response curves: estimates of temporal soil carbon dynamics.

Tristram O West1, Gregg Marland, Anthony W King, Wilfred M Post, Atul K Jain, Kenneth Andrasko.   

Abstract

Measurement of the change in soil carbon that accompanies a change in land use (e.g., forest to agriculture) or management (e.g., conventional tillage to no-till) can be complex and expensive, may require reference plots, and is subject to the variability of statistical sampling and short-term variability in weather. In this paper, we develop Carbon Management Response (CMR) curves that could be used as an alternative to in situ measurements. The CMR curves developed here are based on quantitative reviews of existing global analyses and field observations of changes in soil carbon. The curves show mean annual rates of soil carbon change, estimated time to maximum rates of change, and estimated time to a new soil carbon steady state following the initial change in management. We illustrate how CMR curves could be used in a carbon accounting framework while effectively addressing a number of potential policy issues commonly associated with carbon accounting. We find that CMR curves provide a transparent means to account for changes in soil carbon accumulation and loss rates over time, and also provide empirical relationships that might be used in the development or validation of ecological or Earth systems models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15453404     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-9108-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  5 in total

1.  Evaluating terrestrial carbon sequestration options for Virginia.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Galang; Carl E Zipper; Stephen P Prisley; John M Galbraith; Patricia F Donovan
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-11-23       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Potential greenhouse gas reductions from Natural Climate Solutions in Oregon, USA.

Authors:  Rose A Graves; Ryan D Haugo; Andrés Holz; Max Nielsen-Pincus; Aaron Jones; Bryce Kellogg; Cathy Macdonald; Kenneth Popper; Michael Schindel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Soil carbon debt of 12,000 years of human land use.

Authors:  Jonathan Sanderman; Tomislav Hengl; Gregory J Fiske
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Natural climate solutions for the United States.

Authors:  Joseph E Fargione; Steven Bassett; Timothy Boucher; Scott D Bridgham; Richard T Conant; Susan C Cook-Patton; Peter W Ellis; Alessandra Falcucci; James W Fourqurean; Trisha Gopalakrishna; Huan Gu; Benjamin Henderson; Matthew D Hurteau; Kevin D Kroeger; Timm Kroeger; Tyler J Lark; Sara M Leavitt; Guy Lomax; Robert I McDonald; J Patrick Megonigal; Daniela A Miteva; Curtis J Richardson; Jonathan Sanderman; David Shoch; Seth A Spawn; Joseph W Veldman; Christopher A Williams; Peter B Woodbury; Chris Zganjar; Marci Baranski; Patricia Elias; Richard A Houghton; Emily Landis; Emily McGlynn; William H Schlesinger; Juha V Siikamaki; Ariana E Sutton-Grier; Bronson W Griscom
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  The potential of agricultural land management to contribute to lower global surface temperatures.

Authors:  Allegra Mayer; Zeke Hausfather; Andrew D Jones; Whendee L Silver
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 14.136

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.