Literature DB >> 32275269

Influenza vaccine effectiveness in children: a retrospective study on eight post-pandemic seasons with trivalent inactivated vaccine.

Maria Eugenia Colucci1, Paola Affanni2, Angelo Cantarelli3, Luca Caruso4, Maria Teresa Bracchi5, Emanuela Capobianco6, Roberta Zoni7, Giulia Paini8, Anna Odone9, Mostafa Mohieldin Mohieldin Mahgoub Ibrahim10, Licia Veronesi11.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK: The global burden of disease attributable to seasonal influenza virus in children is difficult to quantify. Children with chronic medical conditions and healthy children may experience severe or fatal complications. Aim of the study was to estimate the influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) in a cohort of outpatient children.
METHODS: From 2010 to 2018, a Pediatrician of Parma from the InfluNet network of Emilia-Romagna Region, performed nasal/throat swabs on every child with Influenza-like illness at least 14 days from the vaccination with trivalent vaccine. VE estimates against influenza season, virus type and subtype and age group were evaluated using a test-negative design.
RESULTS: 2,480 swabs were performed. The 57.6% of the analyzed swabs were positive for influenza viruses. Type A (57%) and type B viruses (43%) co-circulated. The 37.1% of type A viruses belonged to subtype A(H3N2), 19.4% to subtype A(H1N1)pdm09. The subtype A(H3N2) was prevalent among children up to 23 months (42.4%) while the type B in the 2-4 (40.7%) and 5-16 year old age groups (49.4%). Overall, 19.9% of the children were vaccinated. The highest prevalence of vaccinated subjects was found in children aged 5-16 (30.5%). The VE against subtype A(H1N1)pdm09 was 63% (95%CI 42.6-76.0), against type B 27.5% (95%CI 7.9-42.9) and against subtype A(H3N2) -14.3%  (95%CI - 46.0-10.7).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings represent a useful contribution to the ongoing debate about the appropriateness of including influenza vaccination for healthy children, 6 months and older, in the updating National Vaccine Prevention Plan (PNPV).

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32275269      PMCID: PMC7975907          DOI: 10.23750/abm.v91i3-S.9424

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomed        ISSN: 0392-4203


Introduction

The global burden of disease attributable to seasonal influenza virus (SIV) is difficult to quantify, particularly in children younger than 5 years, as pediatric hospitalization rates and SIV-related deaths vary by the predominant circulating strain, and from season to season. For instance, a study conducted by Poheling et al. (1), underlined as among young children, outpatient visits associated with influenza were 10 to 250 times as common as hospitalizations. Moreover, children with chronic medical conditions, as well as healthy children, may experience severe or fatal complications, with a substantial number of excess hospitalizations, medical visits, antibiotic use and deaths (2). Nair et al., in a sistematic review (3), estimated that, in 2008, 90 million new cases of influenza, 20 million cases of influenza-associated ALRI (acute, lower respiratory infections) (13% of all cases of paediatric ALRI), and 1 million cases of influenza-associated severe ALRI (7% of cases of all severe paediatric ALRI) occurred worldwide in children younger than 5 years. They estimated there were 28,000–111,500 deaths in children younger than 5 years attributable to influenza-associated ALRI in 2008, with 99% of these deaths occurring in developing countries. Lafond et al. (4) in 2016, with a different survey methodology, confirmed the great impact of influenza on pediatric hospitalizations and estimated that influenza was associated with 10% of respiratory hospitalizations in children <18 years of age worldwide, ranging from 5% among children <6 mounths to 16% among children 5–17 years, with 374,000 hospitalizations in children <1 years and 870,000 hospitalizations in children <5 years annually. According to American Academy of Pediatrics (5), during 2018/2019 influenza season, 51% of deaths attributable to influenza occurred in children who had at least 1 underlying medical condition; therefore, nearly half had unknown underlying medical conditions. Among the children hospitalized with influenza, 45% had no recorded underlying condition, and 55% had at least 1 underlying medical condition (asthma or reactive airway disease (27.1%)). Nonetheless, children play a central role in the transmission of influenza virus infection to household and other close contacts (6). As shown by Principi et al., (7) the number of medical visits, and the number of missed working or school days, were all significantly greater among the household contacts of influenza positive children than those of children infected by other agents. On the other hand, children have often the highest attack rates in the community during seasonal influenza epidemics (20%-30% in children vs 5%-10% in adults) (8). Universal seasonal vaccine administration to everyone 6 months and older is the best available strategy to prevent SIV complications (9-10), but studies focusing on estimates of vaccine effectiveness (VE) are still required (11-19). In order to contribute to a better understanding of such topic, we performed a retrospective study on eight post pandemic influenza seasons (2010-2018). More specifically, in order to produce seasonal influenza VE estimates, we established a test-negative (TN) study design in a cohort of outpatient children within the context of integrated virological and epidemiological surveillance, coordinated by the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) and conducted in Emilia-Romagna (Northern Italy), at the Regional Reference Laboratory of Parma.

Methods

Subjects in study

From 2010/2011 to 2017/2018, a Pediatrician of Parma, from the InfluNet network of Emilia-Romagna Region, with an average number of 1,149 assisted (4% of all pediatric residents of the Province of Parma) performed nasal or throat swabs, on every child who went to his medical clinic with body temperature > 37.5 °C and at least one symptom among those included in the definition of pediatric ILI (Influenza-Like Illness) (20), (i.e. dry or productive cough, pharyngodynia, nasal/cold congestion, conjunctivitis, chills, asthenia, muscle and osteoarticular pain, irritability, crying, loss of appetite) within 4 days from the beginning of the symptoms and at least 14 days from the vaccination. Each biological sample, marked with a code, was accompanied by a data collection card that reported: the date of birth, sex, the date of the beginning of the symptoms, and the vaccination status. The study was approved by the Provincial Ethical Committee (CEP) as an observational study and a written informed consent document was collected for each subject both for the execution of the swab and for the collection of data.

Virological investigation

The “Virocult” diagnostic kit (MWE, England) was used to collect the clinicals samples. Each sample was delivered into refrigerated box to the Laboratory and was analyzed within 24 hours of arrival. Laboratory diagnosis was undertaken by using one-step Real Time retro-transcription PCR assay (rRT-PCR), able to detect circulating influenza A and B viruses and subtypes, according to CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) and WHO (World Health Organization) protocols (21-22). Viral nucleic acid was extracted from respiratory specimens using the QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). A rRT-PCR was performed with Quantifast Pathogen+IC Kit, (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). From 2013/2014 season, genetic lineage of type B (B Yamagata/Victoria lineage) was also determined. All assays were performed using the Rotor Gene 6000 (Corbett).

Statistical analysis

The results were summarized in tables of frequency and the differences in the proportions were compared by the use of Chi square test, with Yates’s correction of continuity when appropriate. The distribution of subjects’age was summarized by mean, standard deviation (SD) and median, and tested with Anova. In relation to the epidemiological trend and according to the viral circulation monitored by the Italian InfluNet network (23), every influenza season was divided into three phases: first one ascending from the 46th week, a peak phase corresponding to the week with the highest number of positive samples more or less 2 weeks, and a downward phase. Children were stratified into three age groups: 0-23 months, 2-4 year of age, and 5-16 year of age. Under the TN design, subjects who seek medical care for ILI and tested positive for influenza virus infection by RT-PCR are cases, subjects who seek medical care for ILI and tested negative by RT-PCR for influenza virus infection are controls (24-26). We estimated the VE as 1-OR*100 with the relative confidence intervals of 95%. A logistic regression model was used to calculate the adjusted VE (i.e. outcome variable) for sex, age group and epidemic period (i.e. covariates). In particular, were estimated: the overall influenza VE (8 years) (adjusted for epidemic period, age group and sex); the VE against every influenza season (adjusted for epidemic period, age group and sex); the VE against subtype A(H1N1)pdm09, subtype A(H3N2) and type B (adjusted for epidemic period, age group and sex); the VE against age group (adjusted for epidemic period, and sex). P-values equal to or less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 25.0 (IBM SPSS Inc., Chicago – IL).

Results

During the 8 influenza seasons, a total of 2,480 nasal or throat swabs were performed; the highest number of samples was analyzed in the 2012/2013 season (368, 14.8% of all samples), the lowest in the 2013/2014 season (145, 5.8 % of all samples) (Table 1). Study population had a mean age of 4.7 years (SD 3.5), a median age of 4 years (range: 3 months to 16 years), with a male/female ratio of 1.18. Overall, 19.9% of the children were vaccinated with inactivated trivalent vaccine (Table 2). The 57.6% of the analyzed swabs were positive for influenza viruses (range 27.6% to 71.2%; Table 2).
Table 1.

Subjects in study by influenza season.

Influenza SeasonSubjectsSexAgeAge group
(No.) (%)Male (No.) (%)Female (No.) (%)Missing (No.) (%)Ratio M/FMean (SD)Median0-23 mounth (No.) (%)2-4 years (No.) (%)5-16 years (No.) (%)Missing (No.) (%)
2010/2011276 (11.4)141 (51.1)134 (48.6)1 (0.3)1.055.0 (3.5)5.052 (18.9)84 (30.4)137 (49.6)3 (1.1)
2011/2012364 (14.7)183 (50.3)181 (49.7)0 (0)1.014.0 (3.1)3.084 (23.1)156 (42.8)124 (34.1)0 (0)
2012/2013368 (14.8)179 (48.7)183 (49.7)6 (1.6)0.984.4 (3.2)4.070 (19.0)148 (40.2)150 (40.8)0 (0)
2013/2014145 (5.8)79 (54.5)63 (43.4)3 (2.1)1.254.8 (3.8)3.032 (22.1)52 (35.9)61 (42.0)0 (0)
2014/2015339 (13.6)176 (51.9)163 (48.1)0 (0)1.084.7 (3.5)4.075 (22.2)115 (33.9)149 (43.9)0 (0)
2015/2016348 (14.0)183 (52.6)165 (47.4)0 (0)1.114.9 (3.5)4.073 (21.0)106 (30.4)169 (48.6)0 (0)
2016/2017305 (12.2)178 (58.4)127 (41.6)0 (0)1.405.4 (4.0)4.045 (14.8)122 (40.0)138 (45.2)0 (0)
2017/2018335 (13.5)217(64.8)118 (35.2)0 (0)1.844.3 (3.5)3.073 (21.8)144 (43.0)118 (35.2)0 (0)
Total2480 (100)1336 (53.9)1134 (45.7)10 (0.4)1.184.7 (3.5)4.0504 (20.3)927 (37.4)1046 (42.2)3 (0.1)
Table 2.

Influenza virus type/subtype and vaccination status by influenza season.

Influenza SeasonVaccination statusPositive samples/ total swabsInfluenza virus type or subtype
Vaccinated (No.) (%)Unvaccinated (No.) (%)(No.) (%)A unsubtyped (No.) (%)A(H3N2) (No.) (%)A(H1N1)pdm09 (No.) (%)Influenza B (No.) (%)Lineage B/Vic (%)Lineage B/Yam (%)
2010/2011101 (36.6)175 (63.4)175/276 (63.4)4 (2.3)3 (1.7)55 (31.4)113 (64.6)--
2011/2012117 (32.1)247 (67.9)257/364 (70.6)3 (1.2)253 (98.4)0 (0)1 (0.4)--
2012/201357 (15.5)311 (84.5)262/368 (71.2)0 (0)1 (0.4)53 (20.2)208 (79.4)--
2013/201441 (28.3)104 (71.7)40/145 (27.6)0 (0)33 (82.5)6 (15.0)1 (2.5)0100
2014/201566 (19.5)273 (80.5)180/339 (53.1)0 (0)95 (52.8)72 (40.0)13 (7.2)0100
2015/201653 (15.2)295 (84.8)180/348 (53.1)0 (0)11 (6.1)7 (3.9)162 (90.0)98.81.2
2016/201728 (9.2)277 (90.8)134/305 (43.9)0 (0)132 (98.6)1 (0.7)1 (0.7)0100
2017/201831 (9.2)304 (90.8)201/335 (60.0)0 (0)2 (1.0)83 (41.3)116 (57.7)0.999.1
Total494 (19.9)1986 (80.1)1429/2480 (57.6)7/1429 (0.5)530/1429 (37.1)277/1429 (19.4)615/1429 (43.0)
Subjects in study by influenza season. Influenza virus type/subtype and vaccination status by influenza season. During the 8 considered seasons, type A (57%) and type B viruses (43%) co-circulated. The 37.1% of type A viruses belonged to subtype A(H3N2), 19.4% to subtype A(H1N1)pdm09, and the remaining 0.5% was not subtyped. The highest number of samples was collected between the 4th and 6th week of each season in the first 5 epidemic seasons, during the 7th week in the 2015/2016 season, during the 51st week in the 2016/2017 season (3rd week of December 2016) and during the 3rd week of 2018 in the 2017/2018 season (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Number of negative and positive swabs by influenza season and surveillance week

Number of negative and positive swabs by influenza season and surveillance week The season with the highest percentage of the viral isolations was 2012/2013 (71.2%), characterized by the co-circulation of subtype A(H1N1)pdm09 (20.2%) and type B (79.4%), followed by the 2011/2012 season (70.6%) during which subtype A(H3N2) circulated almost exclusively (98.4%). The most evident co-circulation of the 2 subtypes A(H1N1)pdm09 (40.0%) and A(H3N2) (52.8%) was observed in 2014/2015 season (Table 2). The subtype A(H1N1)pdm09 frequently co-circulated with type B, while the circulation of the other strains was substantially residual in 3 out of the 4 seasons in which the subtype A(H3N2) was prevalent. The prevalence of sampled vaccinated children decreased during the study: 36.6% in the immediate post-pandemic season, 9.2% and 9.2% in the 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 influenza seasons (Table 2). The percentage of influenza-positive samples was significantly different in the three age groups: 43.0% among children up to 23 month of age, 55.3% in 2-4 year old children, and 66.6% in older children (p<0,001) (Table 3). The subtype A(H3N2) was prevalent among the youngest children up to 23 months (42.4% of viruses isolated in this age group), while the type B was prevalent in the 2-4 year-old age group (40.7%) and in the 5-16 year-old age group (49.4%). Overall, in the 8 seasons, the highest prevalence of vaccinated subjects was found in the group of children aged 5-16 (30.5%), without differences between males and females (Table 3).
Table 3.

Vaccination status and influenza virus type/subtype by age group.

Age groupVaccination statusPositive samples/total swabsInfluenza virus type or subtype
Vaccinated (No.) (%)Unvaccinated (No.) (%)(No.) (%)A unsubtyped (No.) (%)A(H3N2) (No.) (%)A(H1N1)pdm09 (No.) (%)Influenza B (No.) (%)
0-23 mounths13 (2.6)491 (97.4)217/504 (43.0)1 (0.5)92 (42.4)63 (29.0)61 (28.1)
2-4 years160 (17.3)767 (82.7)513/927 (55.3)4 (0.8)182 (35.5)118 (23.0)209 (40.7)
5-16 years319 (30.5)727 (69.5)697/1046 (66.6)2 (0.3)256 (36.7)95 (13.6)344 (49.4)
Missing2 (66.7)1 (33.3)2/3 (66.7)0 (0)0 (0)1 (50.0)1 (50.0)
Total49419861429/2480 (57.6)7/1429 (0.5)530/1429 (37.1)277/1429 (19.4)615/1429 (43.0)
Vaccination status and influenza virus type/subtype by age group.

VE analysis.

Table 4 shows the VE estimates by epidemic season, by viral type or subtype and by age group. Briegly, considering the 8 epidemic seasons, the overall VE was 37.1% (95% CI 22.2 - 49.2). In 5 of the 8 analyzed seasons, the VE exceeded 50%, ranging from 56% (95% CI 21.1 - 75.5) in 2011/2012 season to 68.9% (95% CI 21.9 - 87.6) in the 2016/2017 season. In 3 seasons, i.e. from 2013 to 2016, the VE was moderate. Specifically, in 2014/2015 season, characterized by the co-circulation of the subtypes A(H1N1)pdm09 and A(H3N2), the VE was 38.2% (95% CI -13.5 - 66.3), while in 2015/2016 season, characterized by the predominant circulation of the B virus (90%), specially B/Victoria lineage (98.8%), VE showed negative values. In the 2013/2014 season, the low number of positive samples made VE estimates unreliable. Overall, the VE against subtype A(H1N1)pdm09 was 63% (95% CI 42.6 - 76.0), against type B 27.5% (95% CI 7.9 - 42.9) and against subtype A(H3N2) -14.3% (95% CI - 46.0 - 10.7). Among the age groups, the VE estimates against younger children under 23 months, were comparable with those aged 5-16, although VE estimates were statistically significant only in this class: 43.1% (95% CI -90.2 – 83.4), and 42.9% (95% CI 23.4 – 56.7) respectively. The lowest value was found in the intermediate age class (2-4 year-old) in which the VE was 27.5% (95% CI -3.8 – 48.9).
Table 4.

Adjusted vaccine effectiveness estimates (VE) against influenza seasons, influenza type and subtype, and age group.

PAdjusted VE %Adjusted 95% CI
LowerUpper
Overall< 0.00137.122.249.2
VE= (1- ORadj) x 100OR adjusted for epidemic period, age group and sex
Against Influenza season
2010/2011< 0.0562.030.779.2
2011/2012< 0.0556.021.175.5
2012/2013< 0.0560.524.879.2
2013/2014n.s.2.7- 137.260.1
2014/2015n.s.38.2- 13.566.3
2015/2016n.s.- 9.9- 112.743.1
2016/2017< 0.0568.921.987.6
2017/2018< 0.0560.513.681.9
VE= (1- ORadj) x 100OR adjusted for epidemic period, age group and sex
Against Influenza type and subtype
A(H1N1)pdm09< 0.00163.042.676.0
A(H3N2)n.s.- 14.3- 46.010.7
B< 0.0527.57.942.9
VE= (1- ORadj) x 100OR adjusted for epidemic period, age group and sex
Against age group
0 - 23 mounthsn.s.43.1- 90.283.4
2 – 4 yearsn.s.27.5- 3.848.2
5 – 16 years< 0.00142.923.456.7
VE= (1- ORadj) x 100OR adjusted for epidemic period and sex
Adjusted vaccine effectiveness estimates (VE) against influenza seasons, influenza type and subtype, and age group.

Conclusions

The eight epidemic seasons considered in our study were characterized by the frequent co-circulation of influenza A and B viruses. Although the percentage of vaccinated children decreased during the course of the study, the coverage rate of our children remained widely above the regional average coverage (1.85%) (27). This permitted to obtain robust VE estimates. Overall, the effectiveness of the vaccination was good but, as already observed in other studies and in different age groups (28), it was high against the subtype A(H1N1)pdm09 (63%) and substantially lower against the subtype A(H3N2) and towards the type B. In particular, in 2014/2015 season, characterized by the co-circulation of the two subtypes A, the low VE value (38.2%; 95% CI -13.5 - 66.3) was supported by an important mismatch of the circulating A(H3N2) strain, genetically and antigenically different from the vaccine strain; in the following season (2015/2016), locally characterized by the intense circulation of type B virus, the presence in the trivalent formulation vaccine of the lineage B/Yamagata, different from the circulating lineage B/Victoria, may have determined the low VE value (27.5% ; 95% CI 7.9 - 42.9). Interestingly in both seasons the relative prevalence of locally circulating strains was different from that observed at National level: in fact, in Italy in 2014/2015 the subtype A(H3N2) represented 41% of the viruses against 52.8% of our study, and in 2015/2016 the type B in Italy represented 57% of the viruses against 90% of our study (29-30). This could account the lower protection of the trivalent vaccine observed in our paediatric population compared to that observed in other studies (31) and underlines the relevance of local surveillance systems that can provide more appropriate data and information in specific population groups (32-35). Our study has some limitations: although the TN design controls for health care seeking behaviour bias, the VE estimates may not be generalizable to entire population (36). We adjusted the VE estimates for age, sex and epidemic season period. However, for accurate VE estimation, it will be necessary to consider, in the future, also a severity score, based on the clinical symptomatology of the disease for each patient; furthermore, the low number of vaccinated children under two year old, did not allow to calculate reliable VE estimates, exactly in this age group, where the greatest questions remain in terms of cost-effectiveness of vaccination, a common theme in many diseases (37), and one of the major drivers in public health decisions. However, the scenario could change quickly: the recent indication to propose vaccination in all pregnant women could determine, in addition to protecting themselves, an increase in protection in newborns as for other vaccine preventable diseases (11,38). Furthermore, in Emilia-Romagna Region, as well as in Italy, the trivalent vaccine has been recently replaced by the quadrivalent vaccine, which should show greater efficacy against B strains, in particular in children. On the other hand, influenza vaccination in Italy in children from 6 months of age, is still voluntary and provided only with payment. In conclusion, our findings represent a useful contribution to the ongoing debate about the appropriateness of including influenza vaccination for healthy children, 6 months and older, in the updating National Vaccine Prevention Plan (PNPV).
  30 in total

1.  Study designs for timely estimation of influenza vaccine effectiveness using European sentinel practitioner networks.

Authors:  Marta Valenciano; Esther Kissling; Bruno Christian Ciancio; Alain Moren
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  The impact of the current economic crisis on mental health in Italy: evidence from two representative national surveys.

Authors:  Anna Odone; Tania Landriscina; Andrea Amerio; Giuseppe Costa
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 3.367

3.  Effectiveness of influenza vaccine in children in preventing influenza associated hospitalisation, 2018/19, England.

Authors:  R G Pebody; H Zhao; H J Whitaker; J Ellis; M Donati; M Zambon; N Andrews
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Immunological insights on influenza infection and vaccination during immune checkpoint blockade in cancer patients.

Authors:  Melissa Bersanelli; Stefania Scala; Paola Affanni; Licia Veronesi; Maria Eugenia Colucci; Giuseppe Luigi Banna; Alessio Cortellini; Francesco Liotta
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 4.196

5.  Influenza vaccine effectiveness in Italy: Age, subtype-specific and vaccine type estimates 2014/15 season.

Authors:  Caterina Rizzo; Antonino Bella; Valeria Alfonsi; Simona Puzelli; Anna Pina Palmieri; Maria Chironna; Elena Pariani; Alessandra Piatti; Donatella Tiberti; Valeria Ghisetti; Roberto Rangoni; Maria Eugenia Colucci; Paola Affanni; Cinzia Germinario; Maria Rita Castrucci
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  Recommendations for Prevention and Control of Influenza in Children, 2018-2019.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Genetic analysis of human and swine influenza A viruses isolated in Northern Italy during 2010-2015.

Authors:  C Chiapponi; E Ebranati; E Pariani; S Faccini; A Luppi; L Baioni; R Manfredi; V Carta; M Merenda; P Affanni; M E Colucci; L Veronesi; G Zehender; E Foni
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.702

8.  Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices - United States, 2019-20 Influenza Season.

Authors:  Lisa A Grohskopf; Elif Alyanak; Karen R Broder; Emmanuel B Walter; Alicia M Fry; Daniel B Jernigan
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2019-08-23

Review 9.  Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy children.

Authors:  Tom Jefferson; Alessandro Rivetti; Carlo Di Pietrantonj; Vittorio Demicheli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-01

Review 10.  Global Role and Burden of Influenza in Pediatric Respiratory Hospitalizations, 1982-2012: A Systematic Analysis.

Authors:  Kathryn E Lafond; Harish Nair; Mohammad Hafiz Rasooly; Fátima Valente; Robert Booy; Mahmudur Rahman; Paul Kitsutani; Hongjie Yu; Guiselle Guzman; Daouda Coulibaly; Julio Armero; Daddi Jima; Stephen R C Howie; William Ampofo; Ricardo Mena; Mandeep Chadha; Ondri Dwi Sampurno; Gideon O Emukule; Zuridin Nurmatov; Andrew Corwin; Jean Michel Heraud; Daniel E Noyola; Radu Cojocaru; Pagbajabyn Nymadawa; Amal Barakat; Adebayo Adedeji; Marta von Horoch; Remigio Olveda; Thierry Nyatanyi; Marietjie Venter; Vida Mmbaga; Malinee Chittaganpitch; Tran Hien Nguyen; Andros Theo; Melissa Whaley; Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner; Joseph Bresee; Harry Campbell; Marc-Alain Widdowson
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  6 in total

1.  Influenza vaccination coverage in pediatric population in Italy: an analysis of recent trends.

Authors:  Floriana D'Ambrosio; Teresa Eleonora Lanza; Rosaria Messina; Leonardo Villani; Angelo Maria Pezzullo; Walter Ricciardi; Aldo Rosano; Chiara Cadeddu
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.288

2.  Reorganization of Active Surveillance of Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP) in Emilia-Romagna, Italy: a two-step Public Health intervention.

Authors:  Lucia Palandri; Mariana Morgado; Maria Eugenia Colucci; Paola Affanni; Roberta Zoni; Sandra Mezzetta; Assunta Bizzarro; Licia Veronesi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-04-10

3.  [Influenza vaccination coverage in Lombardy Region: a twenty-year trend analysis (1999-2019)].

Authors:  Deanna Rossi; Roberto Croci; Paola Affanni; Anna Odone; Carlo Signorelli
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-04-10

4.  Immunity status against tetanus in young migrants: a seroprevalence study.

Authors:  Paola Affanni; Maria Eugenia Colucci; Emanuela Capobianco; Maria Teresa Bracchi; Roberta Zoni; Isabella Viani; Luca Caruso; Lucrezia Carlone; Carlo Arcuri; Licia Veronesi
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2020-04-10

Review 5.  Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in Mainland China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiaokun Yang; Hongting Zhao; Zhili Li; Aiqin Zhu; Minrui Ren; Mengjie Geng; Yu Li; Ying Qin; Luzhao Feng; Zhibin Peng; Zhijie An; Jiandong Zheng; Zhongjie Li; Zijian Feng
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-23

6.  Virological surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in an Italian Northern area: differences in gender, age and Real Time RT PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values in three epidemic periods.

Authors:  Mostafa Mohieldin Mahgoub Ibrahim; Maria Eugenia Colucci; Licia Veronesi; Isabella Viani; Anna Odone; Mattia Pia Arena; Monia Incerti; Elisa Tamburini; Roberta Zoni; Cesira Pasquarella; Paola Affanni
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2021-10-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.