Tanya Mailhot1, Chad Darling2, Jillian Ela3, Yelena Malyuta4, Sharon K Inouye5,6,7, Jane Saczynski1. 1. Department of Pharmacy and Health System Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, UMass Memorial Health Care, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Neurological Associates of Albany, Albany, New York, USA. 4. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 6. Aging Brain Center, Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew Senior Life, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 7. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the ability of the family-rated Family Confusion Assessment Method (FAM-CAM) to identify delirium in the emergency department (ED) among patients with and without dementia, as compared to the reference-standard Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). DESIGN: Validation study. SETTING: Urban academic ED. PARTICIPANTS: Dyads of ED patients, aged 70 years and older, and their family caregivers (N = 108 dyads). MEASUREMENTS: A trained reference standard interviewer performed a cognitive screen, delirium symptom assessment, and scored the CAM. The caregiver self-administered the FAM-CAM. Dementia was assessed using the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly and the medical record. For concurrent validity, performance of the FAM-CAM was compared to the CAM. For predictive validity, clinical outcomes (ED visits, hospitalization, and mortality) over 6 months were compared in FAM-CAM positive and negative patients, controlling for age, sex, comorbidity, and cognitive status. RESULTS: Among the 108 patients, 30 (28%) were CAM positive for delirium and 58 (54%) presented with dementia. The FAM-CAM had a specificity of 83% and a negative predictive value of 83%. Most false negatives (n = 9 of 13, 69%) were due to caregivers not identifying the inattention criteria for delirium on the FAM-CAM. In patients with dementia, sensitivity was higher than in patients without (61% vs 43%). In adjusted models, a hospitalization in the following 6 months was more than three times as likely in FAM-CAM positive compared to negative patients (odds ratio = 3.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.2-9.3). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with and without dementia, the FAM-CAM shows qualities that are important in the ED setting for identification of delirium. Using the FAM-CAM as part of a systematic screening strategy for the ED, in which families' assessments could supplement healthcare professionals' assessments, is promising. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:983-990, 2020.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the ability of the family-rated Family Confusion Assessment Method (FAM-CAM) to identify delirium in the emergency department (ED) among patients with and without dementia, as compared to the reference-standard Confusion Assessment Method (CAM). DESIGN: Validation study. SETTING: Urban academic ED. PARTICIPANTS: Dyads of ED patients, aged 70 years and older, and their family caregivers (N = 108 dyads). MEASUREMENTS: A trained reference standard interviewer performed a cognitive screen, delirium symptom assessment, and scored the CAM. The caregiver self-administered the FAM-CAM. Dementia was assessed using the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly and the medical record. For concurrent validity, performance of the FAM-CAM was compared to the CAM. For predictive validity, clinical outcomes (ED visits, hospitalization, and mortality) over 6 months were compared in FAM-CAM positive and negative patients, controlling for age, sex, comorbidity, and cognitive status. RESULTS: Among the 108 patients, 30 (28%) were CAM positive for delirium and 58 (54%) presented with dementia. The FAM-CAM had a specificity of 83% and a negative predictive value of 83%. Most false negatives (n = 9 of 13, 69%) were due to caregivers not identifying the inattention criteria for delirium on the FAM-CAM. In patients with dementia, sensitivity was higher than in patients without (61% vs 43%). In adjusted models, a hospitalization in the following 6 months was more than three times as likely in FAM-CAM positive compared to negative patients (odds ratio = 3.4; 95% confidence interval = 1.2-9.3). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with and without dementia, the FAM-CAM shows qualities that are important in the ED setting for identification of delirium. Using the FAM-CAM as part of a systematic screening strategy for the ED, in which families' assessments could supplement healthcare professionals' assessments, is promising. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:983-990, 2020.
Authors: Jin H Han; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Xulei Liu; John F Schnelle; Robert S Dittus; E Wesley Ely Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Leonard C Gray; Nancye M Peel; Andrew P Costa; Ellen Burkett; Aparajit B Dey; Palmi V Jonsson; Prabha Lakhan; Gunnar Ljunggren; Fredrik Sjostrand; Walter Swoboda; Nathalie I H Wellens; John Hirdes Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2013-06-25 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Christopher R Carpenter; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Melody S Goodman; Margaret J Lin; Andrew T Melson; Richard T Griffey Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Linda M Schnitker; Melinda Martin-Khan; Ellen Burkett; Elizabeth R A Beattie; Richard N Jones; Len C Gray Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Margaret J Bull; Lesley Boaz; Mehdi Maadooliat; Mary E Hagle; Lynn Gettrust; Maureen T Greene; Sue Baird Holmes; Jane S Saczynski Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Melinda R Steis; Lois Evans; Karen B Hirschman; Alexandra Hanlon; Donna M Fick; Nina Flanagan; Sharon K Inouye Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kevin M Terrell; Fredric M Hustey; Ula Hwang; Lowell W Gerson; Neil S Wenger; Douglas K Miller Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2009-03-30 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Alexander X Lo; Logan K Wedel; Shan W Liu; Thiti Wongtangman; Phraewa Thatphet; Ilianna Santangelo; Anita N Chary; Paul D Biddinger; Corita R Grudzen; Maura Kennedy Journal: J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open Date: 2022-01-20