| Literature DB >> 32273758 |
Xu Jing1, Yingjie Chen1, Ye Chen2, Guangyan Shi1, Shuanghao Lv1, Nana Cheng1, Chaolin Feng1, Zhen Xin1, Liping Zhang3, Jing Wu4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary hepatobiliary malignancy with high incidence and recurrence rate. Ubiquitin-specific protease 8 (USP8) is recently reported to be involved in tumor progression. Herein, we aimed to investigate the effects of USP8 on the growth and metastasis abilities of cholangiocarcinoma cells.Entities:
Keywords: Akt signaling pathway; cholangiocarcinoma; ubiquitin-specific protease 8
Year: 2020 PMID: 32273758 PMCID: PMC7113805 DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S234586
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Manag Res ISSN: 1179-1322 Impact factor: 3.989
Figure 1USP8 regulates the growth of cholangiocarcinoma cells. Cholangiocarcinoma cell lines QBC939 and RBE were transfected with siRNA-USP8 to down-regulate its expression, and siRNA negative control was used as negative control group (si-NC); Hucct-1 cells were transfected with pcDNA3.1-USP8 (USP8-OE) to up-regulate its expression, and pcDNA3.1 vector was used as negative control (NC-OE). (A) RT-PCR assay was used to examine the relative expression of USP8 mRNA in QBC939 and RBE cells transfected with siRNAs for 24h. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 by Student’s t-test vs negative control; n = 3. (B) Expression of USP8 mRNA in Hucct-1 cells after transfected withpcDNA3.1-USP8. **P<0.01by Student’s t-test vs negative control; n = 3. (C) The protein expression of USP8 was detected using Western blot analysis. *P<0.05, **P<0.01by Student’s t-test vs negative control; n = 3. (D–E) CCK8 assay was performed to assess QBC939 (D), RBE (E) and Hucct-1 (F) cells proliferation after indicated treatment. *P<0.05 by Student’s t-test vs negative control; n = 3. (G and H) Colony formation assay was used to examine the clonogenic ability of cholangiocarcinoma cells. **P<0.01by Student’s t-test vs negative control; n = 3.
Figure 2USP8 regulates the migration and invasion abilities of cholangiocarcinoma cells. (A and B) Following transfection of 24 h, Transwell assays were performed to assess the migration (A) and invasion (B) of QBC939 and RBE cells. *P<0.05by Student’s t-test vs negative control; n = 3. (C) Hucct-1 cells migration and invasion were assessed by Transwell assay. *P<0.05 by Student’s t-test vs negative control; n = 3. (D) The MMP9 activity was examined using gelatin zymogram assay when USP8 was knocked down. *P<0.05 by Student’s t-test vs negative control; n = 3.
Figure 3USP8 regulates apoptosis in cholangiocarcinoma cells. (A) Apoptosis in QBC939 and RBE cells transfected with siRNAs was examined using Flow cytometry assay. *P<0.05 by Student’s t-test vs negative control; n = 3. (B) After being transfected with siRNAs for 48 h, the expression of apoptosis-related proteins Bcl-2. Bax, cleaved Caspase 3 and cleaved Caspase 9 was examined using Western blot analysis. *P<0.05 by Student’s t-test vs negative control; n = 3. (C) Cell apoptosis of Hucct-1 cells was examined using Flow cytometry assay. *P<0.05 by Student’s t-test vs negative control; n = 3. (D) Expression of apoptosis-related proteins in Hucct-1 cells after indicated treatment.
Figure 4Knockdown of USP8 inhibits activation of the Akt signaling pathway in cholangiocarcinoma cells. (A) After transfection of 48 h, the expression of key components of the Akt signaling pathway in QBC939 and RBE cells was examined using Western blot analysis. (B and C) Quantitative analysis of the results of Western blot analysis in QBC939 (B) and RBE cells (C). *P<0.05 by Student’s t-test vs negative control; n = 3. (D) Expression of the Akt signaling pathway-related proteins in Hucct-1 cells after indicated treatment. (E) Expression of the Akt signaling pathway-related proteins in QBC939 and RBE cells after indicated treatment. (F) Expression of p53 in QBC939 and RBE cells after USP8 was silenced. (G and H) CCK8 assay was used to assess the proliferation of QBC939 and RBE cells after indicated treatment.*P< 0.05 by ANOVA vs negative control; ΔP< 0.05 by ANOVA vs USP8-silenced group; n = 3.
Figure 5The model of USP8 in the progression of cholangiocarcinoma cells.