Literature DB >> 11573044

Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

W R Jarnagin1, Y Fong, R P DeMatteo, M Gonen, E C Burke, J Bodniewicz BS, M Youssef BA, D Klimstra, L H Blumgart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze resectability and survival in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma according to a proposed preoperative staging scheme that fully integrates local, tumor-related factors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, long-term survival depends critically on complete tumor resection. The current staging systems ignore factors related to local tumor extent, preclude accurate preoperative disease assessment, and correlate poorly with resectability and survival.
METHODS: Demographics, results of imaging studies, surgical findings, pathology, and survival were analyzed prospectively in consecutive patients. Using data from imaging studies, all patients were placed into one of three stages based on the extent of ductal involvement by tumor, the presence or absence of portal vein compromise, and the presence or absence of hepatic lobar atrophy.
RESULTS: From March 1991 through December 2000, 225 patients were evaluated, 77% of whom were seen and treated within the last 6 years. Sixty-five patients had unresectable disease; 160 patients underwent exploration with curative intent. Eighty patients underwent resection: 62 (78%) had a concomitant hepatic resection and 62 (78%) had an R0 resection (negative histologic margins). Negative histologic margins, concomitant partial hepatectomy, and well-differentiated tumor histology were associated with improved outcome after all resections. However, in patients who underwent an R0 resection, concomitant partial hepatectomy was the only independent predictor of long-term survival. Of the 9 actual 5-year survivors (of 30 at risk), all had a concomitant hepatic resection and none had tumor-involved margins; 3 of these 9 patients remained free of disease at a median follow-up of 88 months. The rates of complications and death after resection were 64% and 10%, respectively. In the 219 patients whose disease could be staged, the proposed system predicted resectability and the likelihood of an R0 resection and correlated with metastatic disease and survival.
CONCLUSION: By taking full account of local tumor extent, the proposed staging system for hilar cholangiocarcinoma accurately predicts resectability, the likelihood of metastatic disease, and survival. Complete resection remains the only therapy that offers the possibility of long-term survival, and hepatic resection is a critical component of the surgical approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11573044      PMCID: PMC1422074          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  27 in total

1.  Management of proximal cholangiocarcinomas by surgical resection and radiotherapy.

Authors:  J L Cameron; H A Pitt; M J Zinner; S L Kaufman; J Coleman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Outcome of radical surgery in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  N S Hadjis; J I Blenkharn; N Alexander; I S Benjamin; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Resection or palliation: priority of surgery in the treatment of hilar cancer.

Authors:  H Bismuth; D Castaing; O Traynor
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Prognostic factors in bile duct carcinoma: analysis of 96 cases.

Authors:  R K Tompkins; D Thomas; A Wile; W P Longmire
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Liver resection for bile duct cancer.

Authors:  L H Blumgart; I S Benjamin
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Carcinoma of the hepatic hilus. Surgical management and the case for resection.

Authors:  B Launois; J P Campion; P Brissot; M Gosselin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Clinicopathological aspects of high bile duct cancer. Experience with resection and bypass surgical treatments.

Authors:  R M Beazley; N Hadjis; I S Benjamin; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver.

Authors:  H Bismuth; M B Corlette
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1975-02

9.  Liver atrophy complicating benign bile duct strictures. Surgical and interventional radiologic approaches.

Authors:  A Czerniak; O Soreide; R N Gibson; N S Hadjis; C J Kelley; I S Benjamin; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Proximal bile duct cancer. Quality of survival.

Authors:  E C Lai; R K Tompkins; L L Mann; J J Roslyn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  401 in total

Review 1.  Review article: surgical, neo-adjuvant and adjuvant management strategies in biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  J R A Skipworth; S W M Olde Damink; C Imber; J Bridgewater; S P Pereira; M Malagó
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  [Hilar cholangiocarcinoma -- results of en bloc resection of tumor and liver].

Authors:  G Otto; J Thies; M Hoppe-Lotichius; F Bittinger; M B Pitton; A Hadian
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  Diagnostic laparoscopy: indications and benefits.

Authors:  Beate Rau; Michael Hünerbein
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Metastatic lymph nodes in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: does size matter?

Authors:  Anthony T Ruys; Fiebo J W Ten Kate; Olivier R Busch; Marc R Engelbrecht; Dirk J Gouma; Thomas M van Gulik
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Hepatic artery reconstruction first for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma bismuth type IIIB with contralateral arterial invasion: a novel technical strategy.

Authors:  Eduardo de Santibañes; Victoria Ardiles; Fernando A Alvarez; Juan Pekolj; Claudio Brandi; Axel Beskow
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 6.  [Liver transplantation for hilar cholangiocarcinoma].

Authors:  F Rauchfuss; F Utess; S Schüle; Y Dittmar; H Scheuerlein; U Settmacher
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 7.  [Pathological anatomical characteristics of Klatskin tumors. Classification, current molecular biological aspects, prognosis factors].

Authors:  J Munding; A Tannapfel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 8.  [Resection of Klatskin tumors].

Authors:  D Seehofer; C Kamphues; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Establishment and identification of the human multi-drug-resistant cholangiocarcinoma cell line QBC939/ADM.

Authors:  Zhi-Hua Liu; Yan-Ping He; Yukun Zhou; Peng Zhang; Huanlong Qin
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.316

10.  Improved Survival in Surgically Resected Distal Cholangiocarcinoma Treated with Adjuvant Therapy: a Propensity Score Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Caitlin Hester; Ibrahim Nassour; Beverley Adams-Huet; Mathew Augustine; Michael A Choti; Rebecca M Minter; John C Mansour; Patricio M Polanco; Matthew R Porembka; Sam C Wang; Adam C Yopp
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.