Literature DB >> 32272848

Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: The PARTNER 3 Trial.

Philippe Pibarot1, Erwan Salaun1, Abdellaziz Dahou2, Eleonora Avenatti2, Ezequiel Guzzetti1, Mohamed-Salah Annabi1, Oumhani Toubal1, Mathieu Bernier1, Jonathan Beaudoin1, Géraldine Ong3, Julien Ternacle1, Laura Krapf1, Vinod H Thourani4, Raj Makkar5, Susheel K Kodali6, Mark Russo7, Samir R Kapadia8, S Chris Malaisrie9, David J Cohen10, Jonathon Leipsic11, Philipp Blanke11, Mathew R Williams12, James M McCabe13, David L Brown14, Vasilis Babaliaros15, Scott Goldman16, Wilson Y Szeto17, Philippe Généreux18, Ashish Pershad19, Maria C Alu2,6, Ke Xu20, Erin Rogers20, John G Webb11, Craig R Smith6, Michael J Mack14, Martin B Leon2,6, Rebecca T Hahn2,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare echocardiographic findings in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
METHODS: The PARTNER 3 trial (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) randomized 1000 patients with severe aortic stenosis and low surgical risk to undergo either transfemoral TAVR with the balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 valve or SAVR. Transthoracic echocardiograms obtained at baseline and at 30 days and 1 year after the procedure were analyzed by a consortium of 2 echocardiography core laboratories.
RESULTS: The percentage of moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (AR) was low and not statistically different between the TAVR and SAVR groups at 30 days (0.8% versus 0.2%; P=0.38). Mild AR was more frequent after TAVR than SAVR at 30 days (28.8% versus 4.2%; P<0.001). At 1 year, mean transvalvular gradient (13.7±5.6 versus 11.6±5.0 mm Hg; P=0.12) and aortic valve area (1.72±0.37 versus 1.76±0.42 cm2; P=0.12) were similar in TAVR and SAVR. The percentage of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch at 30 days was low and similar between TAVR and SAVR (4.6 versus 6.3%; P=0.30). Valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva), which reflects total left ventricular hemodynamic burden, was lower with TAVR than SAVR at 1 year (3.7±0.8 versus 3.9±0.9 mm Hg/mL/m2; P<0.001). Tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion decreased and the percentage of moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation increased from baseline to 1 year in SAVR but remained unchanged in TAVR. Irrespective of treatment arm, high Zva and low tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion, but not moderate to severe AR or severe prosthesis-patient mismatch, were associated with increased risk of the composite end point of mortality, stroke, and rehospitalization at 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe aortic stenosis and low surgical risk, TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 valve was associated with similar percentage of moderate or severe AR compared with SAVR but higher percentage of mild AR. Transprosthetic gradients, valve areas, percentage of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch, and left ventricular mass regression were similar in TAVR and SAVR. SAVR was associated with significant deterioration of right ventricular systolic function and greater tricuspid regurgitation, which persisted at 1 year. High Zva and low tricuspid annulus plane systolic excursion were associated with worse outcome at 1 year whereas AR and severe prosthesis-patient mismatch were not. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02675114.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve stenosis; echocardiography; hemodynamics; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Year:  2020        PMID: 32272848     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  13 in total

Review 1.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Masaki Miyasaka
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  A biological approach to aortic valve disease: durability and survival.

Authors:  Michael E Ibrahim; Joseph E Bavaria; Ismail El-Hamamsy
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  A Robotically Steerable Guidewire With Forward-Viewing Ultrasound: Development of Technology for Minimally-Invasive Imaging.

Authors:  Graham C Collins; Achraj Sarma; Zachary L Bercu; Jaydev P Desai; Brooks D Lindsey
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.756

4.  Author`s Reply.

Authors:  Bilge Duran Karaduman; Hüseyin Ayhan; Telat Keleş; Engin Bozkurt
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Long-Term Results (up to 20 Years) of 19 mm or Smaller Prostheses in the Aortic Position. Does Size Matter? A Propensity-Matched Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Horea Feier; Andrei Grigorescu; Lucian Falnita; Oana Rachita; Marian Gaspar; Constantin T Luca
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  Clinical and Technical Challenges of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Pier Pasquale Leone; Fabio Fazzari; Francesco Cannata; Jorge Sanz-Sanchez; Antonio Mangieri; Lorenzo Monti; Ottavia Cozzi; Giulio Giuseppe Stefanini; Renato Bragato; Antonio Colombo; Bernhard Reimers; Damiano Regazzoli
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-04

7.  The noninferiority of transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic disease: Evidence based on 16 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Peng-Ying Zhao; Yong-Hong Wang; Rui-Sheng Liu; Ji-Hai Zhu; Jian-Ying Wu; Bing Song
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Comparison of postprocedural new-onset atrial fibrillation between transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 16 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yongmin Ding; Minmin Wan; Hemei Zhang; Chunyu Wang; Zhuoyu Dai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Direct Flow Medical vs. Edwards Sapien 3 Prosthesis: A Propensity Matched Comparison on Intermediate Safety and Mortality.

Authors:  Christoph Edlinger; Marwin Bannehr; Bernhard Wernly; Tanja Kücken; Maki Okamoto; Michael Lichtenauer; Valentin Hähnel; David Reiners; Michael Neuss; Christian Butter
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-06-18

10.  Comparison of Transvalvular Aortic Mean Gradients Obtained by Intraprocedural Echocardiography and Invasive Measurement in Balloon and Self-Expanding Transcatheter Valves.

Authors:  Amr E Abbas; Ramy Mando; Amer Kadri; Houman Khalili; George Hanzel; Francis Shannon; Karim Al-Azizi; Thomas Waggoner; Safwan Kassas; Thomas Pilgrim; Taishi Okuno; Alexander Camacho; Alexandra Selberg; Sammy Elmariah; Anthony Bavry; Julien Ternacle; Jared Christensen; Neil Gheewala; Philippe Pibarot; Michael Mack
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.