Purpose: Neurons carry electrical signals and communicate via electrical activities. The therapeutic potential of electrical stimulation (ES) for the nervous system, including the retina, through improvement of cell survival and function has been noted. Here we investigated the neuroprotective and regenerative potential of ES in a mouse model of inherited retinal degeneration. Methods: Rhodopsin-deficient (Rho-/-) mice received one or two sessions of transpalpebral ES or sham treatments for 7 consecutive days. Intraperitoneal injection of 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine was used to label proliferating cells. Weekly electroretinograms were performed to monitor retinal function. Retinal morphology, photoreceptor survival, and regeneration were evaluated in vivo using immunohistochemistry and genetic fate-mapping techniques. Müller cell (MC) cultures were employed to further define the optimal conditions of ES application. Results: Noninvasive transpalpebral ES in Rho-/- mice improved photoreceptor survival and electroretinography function in vivo. ES also triggered residential retinal progenitor-like cells such as MCs to reenter the cell cycle, possibly producing new photoreceptors, as shown by immunohistochemistry and genetic fate-mapping techniques. ES directly stimulated cell proliferation and the expression of progenitor cell markers in MC cultures, at least partially through bFGF signaling. Conclusions: Our study showed that transpalpebral ES improved photoreceptor survival and retinal function and induced the proliferation, probably photoreceptor regeneration, of MCs; this occurs via stimulation of the bFGF pathways. These results suggest the exciting possibility of applying noninvasive ES as a versatile tool for preventing photoreceptor loss and mobilizing endogenous progenitors for reversing vision loss in patients with photoreceptor degeneration.
Purpose: Neurons carry electrical signals and communicate via electrical activities. The therapeutic potential of electrical stimulation (ES) for the nervous system, including the retina, through improvement of cell survival and function has been noted. Here we investigated the neuroprotective and regenerative potential of ES in a mouse model of inherited retinal degeneration. Methods:Rhodopsin-deficient (Rho-/-) mice received one or two sessions of transpalpebral ES or sham treatments for 7 consecutive days. Intraperitoneal injection of 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine was used to label proliferating cells. Weekly electroretinograms were performed to monitor retinal function. Retinal morphology, photoreceptor survival, and regeneration were evaluated in vivo using immunohistochemistry and genetic fate-mapping techniques. Müller cell (MC) cultures were employed to further define the optimal conditions of ES application. Results: Noninvasive transpalpebral ES in Rho-/- mice improved photoreceptor survival and electroretinography function in vivo. ES also triggered residential retinal progenitor-like cells such as MCs to reenter the cell cycle, possibly producing new photoreceptors, as shown by immunohistochemistry and genetic fate-mapping techniques. ES directly stimulated cell proliferation and the expression of progenitor cell markers in MC cultures, at least partially through bFGF signaling. Conclusions: Our study showed that transpalpebral ES improved photoreceptor survival and retinal function and induced the proliferation, probably photoreceptor regeneration, of MCs; this occurs via stimulation of the bFGF pathways. These results suggest the exciting possibility of applying noninvasive ES as a versatile tool for preventing photoreceptor loss and mobilizing endogenous progenitors for reversing vision loss in patients with photoreceptor degeneration.