Literature DB >> 32271314

Real-world outcomes associated with standard half-life and extended half-life factor replacement products for treatment of haemophilia A and B.

Amit Chhabra1, Dean Spurden2, Patrick F Fogarty3, Bartholomew J Tortella3, Emily Rubinstein1, Simon Harris2, Andreas M Pleil4, Jennifer Mellor5, Jonathan de Courcy5, José Alvir1.   

Abstract

: Standard-of-care treatment for haemophilia A or B is to maintain adequate coagulation factor levels through clotting factor administration. The current study aimed to evaluate annualised bleeding rates (ABR) and treatment adherence for haemophilia A or B patients receiving standard half-life (SHL) vs. extended half-life (EHL) factor replacement products. We analysed data from the Adelphi Disease-Specific Programmes, a health record-based survey of United States and European haematologists. Analysis included 651 males with moderate-to-severe haemophilia A or B (the United States, n = 132; Europe, n = 519). The haemophilia A analysis included 501 patients (SHL, n = 435; EHL, n = 66). In the combined United States/European population, mean (SD) ABR was 1.7 (1.69) for the SHL group and 1.8 (2.00) for the EHL group. A total of 72% of patients receiving SHL factor VIII and 75% of patients receiving EHL factor VIII in the combined population were fully adherent (no doses missed of the last 10 doses), as reported by physicians. The haemophilia B analysis included 150 patients (SHL, n = 114; EHL, n = 36). The mean (SD) ABR in the combined population was 2.1 (2.16) for patients receiving SHL factor IX (FIX) and 1.4 (1.48) for patients receiving EHL FIX. The percentage of fully adherent patients (physician-reported) was similar in both treatment groups (SHL FIX, 68%; EHL FIX, 73%). In this preliminary real-world survey in a relatively small sample of patients, measures of ABR and adherence between SHL and EHL products were evaluated. Additional real-world research on prescribing patterns, SHL vs. EHL effectiveness, and adherence is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32271314      PMCID: PMC7195855          DOI: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis        ISSN: 0957-5235            Impact factor:   1.061


  25 in total

1.  Clinical use of recombinant factor VIII Fc and recombinant factor IX Fc in patients with haemophilia A and B.

Authors:  C Wang; G Young
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.287

2.  VERITAS-PRN: a new measure of adherence to episodic treatment regimens in haemophilia.

Authors:  N A Duncan; W G Kronenberger; C P Roberson; A D Shapiro
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.287

3.  Extended half-life clotting factor concentrates: results from published clinical trials.

Authors:  G Young; J N Mahlangu
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.287

Review 4.  The past and future of haemophilia: diagnosis, treatments, and its complications.

Authors:  Flora Peyvandi; Isabella Garagiola; Guy Young
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A commentary on the differences in pharmacokinetics between recombinant and plasma-derived factor IX and their implications for dosing.

Authors:  S Björkman
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.287

6.  Real-world physician and patient behaviour across countries: Disease-Specific Programmes - a means to understand.

Authors:  P Anderson; M Benford; N Harris; M Karavali; J Piercy
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 2.580

7.  Recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein: extended-interval dosing maintains low bleeding rates and correlates with von Willebrand factor levels.

Authors:  A D Shapiro; M V Ragni; R Kulkarni; J Oldenberg; A Srivastava; D V Quon; K J Pasi; H Hanabusa; I Pabinger; J Mahlangu; P Fogarty; D Lillicrap; S Kulke; J Potts; S Neelakantan; I Nestorov; S Li; J A Dumont; H Jiang; A Brennan; G F Pierce
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 5.824

8.  Phase 3 study of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein in hemophilia B.

Authors:  Jerry S Powell; K John Pasi; Margaret V Ragni; Margareth C Ozelo; Leonard A Valentino; Johnny N Mahlangu; Neil C Josephson; David Perry; Marilyn J Manco-Johnson; Shashikant Apte; Ross I Baker; Godfrey C Chan; Nicolas Novitzky; Raymond S Wong; Snejana Krassova; Geoffrey Allen; Haiyan Jiang; Alison Innes; Shuanglian Li; Lynda M Cristiano; Jaya Goyal; Jurg M Sommer; Jennifer A Dumont; Karen Nugent; Gloria Vigliani; Aoife Brennan; Alvin Luk; Glenn F Pierce
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Outcome of Clinical Trials with New Extended Half-Life FVIII/IX Concentrates.

Authors:  Maria Elisa Mancuso; Elena Santagostino
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 10.  Treatment adherence in hemophilia.

Authors:  Courtney D Thornburg; Natalie A Duncan
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.711

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Real-World Dose and Consumption for Two Extended Half-Life Recombinant Factor VIII Products for the Treatment of Hemophilia A in the United States.

Authors:  Yanyu Wu; Shawn X Sun; Tao Fan
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2022-09-24

2.  Clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of severe hemophilia B in the United States: Results from the CHESS US and CHESS US+ population surveys.

Authors:  Tom Burke; Sohaib Asghar; Jamie O'Hara; Eileen K Sawyer; Nanxin Li
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 4.123

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.