Literature DB >> 21299739

A commentary on the differences in pharmacokinetics between recombinant and plasma-derived factor IX and their implications for dosing.

S Björkman1.   

Abstract

This commentary aims to summarize all aspects of the difference in pharmacokinetics (PK) between recombinant factor IX (rFIX) and plasma-derived factor IX (pdFIX) and their implications for dosing. PK data were compiled from 17 published studies. The average clearance (CL) of rFIX normally ranged between 7.5 and 9.1 mL h(-1) kg(-1), whereas that of pdFIX was 3.8-5.4 mL h(-1) kg(-1). The average terminal half-life was 18-24 h among all 72-h studies on rFIX, in contrast to (normally) 29-43 h for pdFIX. In vivo recovery was more variable. Judging from the pooled data, the typical recovery of rFIX is around two-third that of pdFIX. The difference in PK between rFIX and pdFIX is thus clear-cut and has implications for dosing. As estimated from the compiled data, the dose required to reach any peak level of FIX immediately after administration would be 1.5 times higher for rFIX than for pdFIX, most probably with considerable individual variation. Calculated doses for a patient on a twice weekly prophylactic treatment to achieve a predetermined trough FIX level depended markedly on CL and were about twice as high with rFIX as with pdFIX. In summary, conversion factors between rFIX and pdFIX of 1.5 for single doses and 2 for prophylactic dosing can tentatively be applied; however, the interindividual variance both in recovery and CL of rFIX and pdFIX and the unknown variance in ratios between these PK parameters call for careful monitoring if a switch of treatment is made.
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21299739     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02431.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  7 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetics of plasma-derived factor IX in adult patients with haemophilia B: implications for dosing in prophylaxis.

Authors:  Sven Björkman; Victor Ahlén
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Evidence of clinically significant extravascular stores of factor IX.

Authors:  D Feng; K A Stafford; G J Broze; D W Stafford
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.824

3.  Coronary artery bypass grafting in a patient with hemophilia B: continuous recombinant factor IX infusion as per the Japanese guidelines for replacement therapy.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Suzuki; Shunsuke Kawamoto; Kiichiro Kumagai; Osamu Adachi; Keisuke Kanda; Masaaki Ishikawa; Yoko Okitsu; Hideo Harigae; Shin Kurosawa; Yoshikatsu Saiki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-12-19

4.  Use of pharmacokinetic modelling to individualize FFP dosing in factor V deficiency.

Authors:  V Shakhnovich; J Daniel; B Wicklund; G Kearns; K Neville
Journal:  Haemophilia       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 4.287

5.  Coagulation Factor IX for Hemophilia B Therapy.

Authors:  N A Orlova; S V Kovnir; I I Vorobiev; A G Gabibov
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.845

6.  Treatment of hemophilia B: focus on recombinant factor IX.

Authors:  Massimo Franchini; Francesco Frattini; Silvia Crestani; Cinzia Sissa; Carlo Bonfanti
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2013-02-12

7.  Real-world outcomes associated with standard half-life and extended half-life factor replacement products for treatment of haemophilia A and B.

Authors:  Amit Chhabra; Dean Spurden; Patrick F Fogarty; Bartholomew J Tortella; Emily Rubinstein; Simon Harris; Andreas M Pleil; Jennifer Mellor; Jonathan de Courcy; José Alvir
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.061

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.