Liquid extraction surface analysis (LESA) is an ambient surface sampling technique that allows the analysis of intact proteins directly from tissue samples via mass spectrometry. Integration of ion mobility separation to LESA mass spectrometry workflows has shown significant improvements in the signal-to-noise ratios of the resulting protein mass spectra and hence the number of proteins detected. Here, we report the use of a quadrupole-cyclic ion mobility-time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Q-cIM-ToF) for the analysis of proteins from mouse brain and rat kidney tissues sampled via LESA. Among other features, the instrument allows multiple pass cyclic ion mobility separation, with concomitant increase in resolving power. Single-pass experiments enabled the detection of 30 proteins from mouse brain tissue, rising to 44 when quadrupole isolation was employed. In the absence of ion mobility separation, 21 proteins were detected in rat kidney tissue including the abundant α- and β-globin chains from hemoglobin. Single-pass cyclic ion mobility mass spectrometry enabled the detection of 60 additional proteins. Multipass experiments of a narrow m/z range (m/z 870-920) resulted in the detection of 24 proteins (one pass), 37 proteins (two passes) and 54 proteins (three passes), thus demonstrating the benefits of improved mobility resolving power.
Liquid extraction surface analysis (LESA) is an ambient surface sampling technique that allows the analysis of intact proteins directly from tissue samples via mass spectrometry. Integration of ion mobility separation to LESA mass spectrometry workflows has shown significant improvements in the signal-to-noise ratios of the resulting protein mass spectra and hence the number of proteins detected. Here, we report the use of a quadrupole-cyclic ion mobility-time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Q-cIM-ToF) for the analysis of proteins from mouse brain and rat kidney tissues sampled via LESA. Among other features, the instrument allows multiple pass cyclic ion mobility separation, with concomitant increase in resolving power. Single-pass experiments enabled the detection of 30 proteins from mouse brain tissue, rising to 44 when quadrupole isolation was employed. In the absence of ion mobility separation, 21 proteins were detected in rat kidney tissue including the abundant α- and β-globin chains from hemoglobin. Single-pass cyclic ion mobility mass spectrometry enabled the detection of 60 additional proteins. Multipass experiments of a narrow m/z range (m/z 870-920) resulted in the detection of 24 proteins (one pass), 37 proteins (two passes) and 54 proteins (three passes), thus demonstrating the benefits of improved mobility resolving power.
Liquid extraction surface analysis
(LESA)[1] is an ambient surface sampling
technique that is capable of extracting analytes from solid substrates
prior to analysis by mass spectrometry (MS). LESA uses a robotic pipet
to dispense and hold a small volume of solvent on the substrate. Analytes
diffuse into the solvent which is reaspirated by the pipet and introduced
to the mass spectrometer by nanoelectrospray ionization. By tailoring
the LESA extraction solvent, it is possible to extract different classes
of molecules including lipids,[2] metabolites,[3−5] proteolytic peptides,[6−8] and proteins[9−11] from a range of different substrates
including thin tissue sections,[2,5,11] dried blood spots,[9] and bacteria.[10,12]For protein analysis, LESA may either be integrated with on-tissue
digestion and subsequent separation by liquid chromatography (the
“bottom-up” approach) or used directly for the analysis
of intact proteins (the “top-down” approach). The former
enables a greater depth of proteome coverage,[6,7] albeit
at significant time cost, whereas the latter has the capability to
provide comprehensive information on single nucleotide polymorphisms
and post-translational modifications,[11] and connectivity, on a time scale more compatible with mass spectrometry
imaging.[13] The analysis of intact proteins
directly from tissue is challenging due to the complex nature of the
substrate. To address this challenge, separation techniques are often
implemented such as liquid chromatography (LC) or ion mobility spectrometry
(IMS). LC methods for proteins are typically slow, with gradients
of minutes to hours, whereas IMS methods are much faster (millisecond
time scales) and therefore compatible with ambient MS methods such
as LESA and desorption electrospray ionization (DESI). IMS separates
ions based on their gas phase mobility[14] which is dependent on the gas pressure, temperature, masses of ion
and gas molecules, and their rotationally averaged collision cross-section
(CCS). To date, two types of IMS have been used in conjunction with in situ ambient sampling of intact proteins: high field
asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS)[13,15−19] and traveling wave ion mobility spectrometry (TWIMS).[20,21] TWIMS utilizes a stacked ring ion guide to confine and transmit
ions.[22,23] A series of voltage pulses is applied along
the electrodes, resulting in a “travelling wave” which
propels the ions through the cell. Ions undergo “roll over”
events on the waves with ions of lower mobility undergoing more roll
over events than those of higher mobility, effectively leading to
temporal separation. Ions are introduced into the TWIMS device in
the form of packets, and their transit times across the device are
recorded, resulting in arrival time distributions (ATDs).[24,25] The resolving power of a TWIMS (and classical drift tube ion mobility
spectrometry) device depends on the square root of its length. To
enable separations at substantially long path lengths, without significant
increase in instrument length, Giles et al. introduced a multipass
cyclic ion mobility (cIM) separator[26] with
a path length for a single pass of 98 cm. Subsequent refinements enabled
the authors to demonstrate an ion mobility resolving power R of 750 with 100 passes (i.e., a path length of 98 m) of
two isomeric pentapeptides with a corresponding separation time of
∼1.5 s (∼15 ms per pass).[27] In a recent study, Eldrid et al. investigated multipass cIM separations
of several common proteins, showing that minimal structural changes
were induced in the small monomeric protein cytochrome C, and no structural
changes were induced in tetrameric concanavalin A (102 kDa) after
subjecting ions to separations lasting for hundreds of milliseconds.[28]Here, we investigate the use of cIM-MS
for the analysis of complex
mixtures of intact proteins that have been extracted from thin tissue
sections of mouse brain and rat kidney by use of LESA. For the mouse
brain sample, 30 proteins were detected following single-pass cIM-MS
analysis, a 2-fold increase over the number detected when ion mobility
separation was not considered. The mass spectrum obtained for mouse
brain tissue was dominated by singly charged species in the m/z 300–600 region. By adjusting
the quadrupole transmission profile (described later) together with
single-pass cIM-MS analysis, a further 16 peptides or protein species
were detected (at the expense of two of the proteins detected without
the adjustment) for a total of 44 proteins. For the rat kidney sample,
19 proteins were detected when the ion mobility dimension was not
considered including α- and β-globins. Single-pass cIM-MS
analysis revealed a further 60 proteins. Higher resolution multipass
experiments were performed in which a narrow quadrupole isolation
window (to avoid wrap around in the cIM device[27]) was combined with one, two, and three passes of the cIM
device, enabling the detection of 24, 37, and 54 proteins, respectively.
Although we have used LESA for extraction of proteins from tissue,
the results are also relevant for more traditional experiments combining
tissue homogenization and protein extraction.
Experimental Section
Materials
Thin
Tissue Sections
Rat kidney tissue from control
(vehicle-dosed) adult male Hans Wister rats was the kind gift of Dr.
Richard Goodwin (AstraZeneca). Animals were euthanized by cardiac
puncture under isofluorane anesthetic. All tissue dissection was performed
by trained AstraZeneca staff (project license 40/3484, procedure number
10). Mouse brain tissue was obtained from wild-type mice (extraneous
tissue from culled animals) and was the kind gift of Prof. Steve Watson
(University of Birmingham). All organs were snap frozen and stored
at −80 °C until sectioning. Tissues were cryosectioned
at a thickness of 10 μm slices using a CM1850 cryostat (Leica
Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and thaw mounted onto glass slides.
Sampling Solvents
Formic acid and HPLC-grade ethanol,
acetonitrile, and water were purchased from Fisher (Loughborough,
U.K.). The lipid extraction solvent consisted of ethanol, water, and
formic acid (79.95:19.95:0.1), and the protein extraction solvent
consisted of acetonitrile, water, and formic acid (39.5:59.5:1).
LESA Extraction
The glass slides holding the tissue
samples were placed in the sample tray of a Triversa Nanomate (Advion,
Ithaca, NY), next to half of a 96 well microtiter plate which held
the two LESA extraction solvents in separate wells. The advanced user
interface (AUI) was used to control LESA sampling of the tissues.
For the mouse brain tissue, lipid extraction was first performed;
5 μL of the ethanol-based extraction solvent was aspirated from
the relevant solvent well. The pipet tip was then relocated to a position
on the tissue specified in the AUI and lowered to a height of approximately
2 mm. Then, 1.2 μL of solvent was dispensed onto the tissue
creating a microjunction ∼1.5 mm in diameter which was held
for 6 s before 1.3 μL of solvent was reaspirated. The dispense/reaspirate
cycle was repeated twice before the extracted sample was dispensed
into a clean well in the microtiter plate. A number of locations on
three separate tissue sections, for a total of 15 locations, were
sampled in this manner. The extracted samples were pooled to give
a final sample volume of ∼75 μL. This lipid-containing
sample was stored at −80 °C for future analysis but is
not further discussed in this Article. The tissue sections were allowed
to dry in air at room temperature for ∼10 min before protein
extraction was performed. The same locations were resampled using
the acetonitrile-based solvent: 5 μL of solvent was aspirated;
1.4 μL of solvent was dispensed onto the tissue with a pipet
height of 2.2 mm and held for 7 s, creating a microjunction of approximately
1.5 mm in diameter before 1.5 μL of solvent was reaspirated.
The dispense/reaspirate cycle was repeated five times before the sample
was dispensed into a clean well. Once again, the extracted samples
were pooled to give a final volume of ∼75 μL. The rat
kidney tissue was sampled as described above but without pre-extraction
of the lipids. The protein-containing samples were stored at −80
°C until analysis.
Cyclic Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry
All experiments
were performed on a prototype cIM-MS instrument (Waters, Wilmslow,
UK) (Figure S1, Supporting Information).
A detailed description of the instrument design has been published
by Giles et al.,[27] where it was shown that
the resolving power of the cIM device scales as ∼70(n·z)1/2, where n is the number of passes around the device, and z is the charge state of the ion.[27] Samples were introduced into the instrument by nanoelectrospray
ionization, in positive ion mode, using 4 μm tip glass tip emitters
(New Objective, Woburn, MA, USA) with an applied capillary voltage
of 1.5 kV. Ions were transferred from the source through the quadrupole
mass filter. Mass spectra were acquired over a m/z range of 50–4000
or 50–2000 for ∼7 min. For the broad m/z range work,
the quadrupole was operated in nonresolving mode with ramping RF voltage
appropriate to the m/z range. For
some experiments (see text), specific m/z ranges were selected by use of the quadrupole either in “resolving
mode” or “nonresolving mode” with a fixed “low
mass cutoff”. Ions were accumulated in the trap region before
injection into the orthogonal loop of the cIM for separation. In most
experiments, where a broad m/z range
of species was transmitted, only a single pass of the cIM was used
to avoid the phenomenon known as “wrap around” in which
more mobile ions “catch up” with the less mobile ions.[27] Multipass experiments were performed on samples
from rat kidney: a small (50 m/z) quadrupole isolation was employed to limit the mobility range of
the ions and therefore enable second and third passes of the cIM without
“wrap around”. Full experimental details are provided
in Tables S1, S2, and S3 of the Supporting Information.
Data Analysis
All data analysis was performed using
MassLynx V4.1 and Driftscope V2.4 or V2.9 (Waters, Wimslow, U.K.).
Protein mass assignments were performed manually using a combination
of isotope deconvolution and charge state deconvolution. All reported
masses correspond to average masses or the mass of the most abundant
isotope.
Results and Discussion
Figure A shows
the total LESA mass spectrum (i.e., of the entire ATD) obtained from
mouse brain tissue following a single-pass cIM-MS analysis. As this
spectrum represents the entire ATD, the ion mobility dimension is
not considered. The mass spectrum is dominated by peaks corresponding
to singly charged ions in the m/z range 250–650, while in the higher m/z range (650–2000) peaks corresponding to multiply
charged protein ions are observed. Peaks at m/z 779, 857, 952, 1070, 1223, and 1427 are putatively assigned
as the 11+, 10+, 9+, 8+, 7+, and 6+ charge states of ubiquitin (MWave 8564 Da). Ubiquitin is abundant in the brain and is commonly
observed in LESA MS of brain tissue sections.[13] (Note that unambiguous assignment would require accurate mass measurement
and/or MS/MS fragmentation). In addition, a range of proteins of molecular
weight 4918 to 16788 Da were detected (Table S4, Supporting Information). In total, 16 individual protein species
were detected when IM separation was not considered. Figure B shows the corresponding 2D
heat-map plot of arrival time versus m/z obtained from the mouse brain sample. The mass spectra extracted
from the protein-containing regions of interest (ROI 1–3, indicated
in Figure B) are shown
in Figure C. In general,
it was observed that ROI 1 typically contained higher molecular weight
proteins, ROI 2 intermediate molecular weight proteins, and ROI 3
lower molecular weight proteins. By extracting the mass spectra for
the three ROIs from the 2D data, it was possible to detect 97 features
corresponding to 30 individual proteins, a 2-fold improvement on the
number detected in the absence of ROI extraction.
Figure 1
LESA single-pass cIM-MS
of mouse brain. (A) Total LESA mass spectrum
(summed across the entire ATD). (B) 2D heat-map (arrival time vs m/z). Regions of interest (ROI) containing
peaks corresponding to proteins are highlighted. (C) Mass spectra
extracted from ROI 1, ROI 2, and ROI 3. Abundant proteins are indicated.
LESA single-pass cIM-MS
of mouse brain. (A) Total LESA mass spectrum
(summed across the entire ATD). (B) 2D heat-map (arrival time vs m/z). Regions of interest (ROI) containing
peaks corresponding to proteins are highlighted. (C) Mass spectra
extracted from ROI 1, ROI 2, and ROI 3. Abundant proteins are indicated.The mass spectrum shown in Figure A is dominated by singly charged peaks in
the range m/z 250–650. To
remove these, the
quadrupole was set to reject species below m/z 600 (using the “low mass cutoff”). The remaining
ions were subjected to single-pass cIM separation. The resulting total
LESA mass spectrum is shown in Figure A. A total of 24 individual proteins were detected
without ROI extraction (Table S5, Supporting Information). The corresponding 2D heat-map of arrival time versus m/z is shown in Figure B, with protein-containing ROIs highlighted.
(Note that the trend lines observed below 500 m/z and 5–15 ms are artifacts resulting from carry
over of higher m/z ions in the ToF
analyzer from the previous MS acquisition). The associated extracted
mass spectra from the protein-containing ROIs are shown in Figure C. In total, 44 individual
peptides and proteins ranging from 1.8–17 kDa were detected
(Table S5, Supporting Information). Two
of the proteins detected without the use of low mass cutoff (Figure ) were not detected
here. The increased number of proteins detected when the fixed low
mass cutoff was employed is perhaps counterintuitive but can at least
in part be explained by the quadrupole transmission profile compared
to the nonresolving ramped RF mode: Thirteen of the 16 additional
species detected when the fixed low mass cutoff was employed were
observed within the m/z range 600–900,
i.e., close to the transmission maximum (at around m/z 800) for the set quadrupole RF. Additionally,
the duty cycle will have increased compared to the (standard) RF ramping
mode. The remaining species were observed at m/z 979, 1041, and 1132.
Figure 2
LESA single-pass cIM-MS of mouse brain
tissue, with the quadrupole
set to transmit m/z > 600. (A)
Total
LESA mass spectrum (summed across the entire ATD). (B) 2D heat-map
(arrival time vs m/z). Regions of
interest (ROI) containing peaks corresponding to proteins are highlighted.
(C) Mass spectra extracted from ROI 1, ROI 2, ROI 3, and ROI 4. Abundant
proteins are indicated.
LESA single-pass cIM-MS of mouse brain
tissue, with the quadrupole
set to transmit m/z > 600. (A)
Total
LESA mass spectrum (summed across the entire ATD). (B) 2D heat-map
(arrival time vs m/z). Regions of
interest (ROI) containing peaks corresponding to proteins are highlighted.
(C) Mass spectra extracted from ROI 1, ROI 2, ROI 3, and ROI 4. Abundant
proteins are indicated.The use of single-pass
cIM separation offered similar advantages
for the rat kidney sample. Figure A shows the total LESA mass spectrum obtained from
rat kidney tissue. The mass spectrum is dominated by peaks putatively
assigned as the α- and β-globin chains of hemoglobin in
charge states from 15+ to 23+ and 16+ to 21+, respectively, based
on average molecular weight and prior knowledge of this tissue from
previous LESA experiments.[16] The singly
charged heme group is also observed at m/z 616. Nineteen other protein species were detected in this
mass spectrum (Table S6, Supporting Information). Figure B shows
the corresponding 2D heat-map of arrival time versus m/z with protein-containing ROIs highlighted. The
associated mass spectra are shown in Figure C. The mass spectrum obtained from ROI 1
contains peaks corresponding to the dominant α- and β-globin
chains, while those from ROI 2–5 contain peaks corresponding
to intact proteins ranging in molecular weight from 4–18 kDa
(Table S6, Supporting Information). The
use of the cIM device enabled the detection of an additional 60 proteins.
Figure 3
LESA single-pass
cIM-MS of rat kidney. (A) Total LESA mass spectrum
(summed across the entire ATD). (B) 2D heat-map (arrival time vs m/z). Regions of interest (ROI) containing
peaks corresponding to proteins are highlighted. (C) Mass spectra
extracted from ROI 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.. Abundant proteins are indicated.
LESA single-pass
cIM-MS of rat kidney. (A) Total LESA mass spectrum
(summed across the entire ATD). (B) 2D heat-map (arrival time vs m/z). Regions of interest (ROI) containing
peaks corresponding to proteins are highlighted. (C) Mass spectra
extracted from ROI 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.. Abundant proteins are indicated.Thus far, the data presented have been acquired
using a single
pass of the cIM device with R ∼ 70·z1/2.[27] Further improvements
in R may be achieved by multiple passes; however,
LESA extraction of thin tissue sections results in highly complex
samples containing a range of molecular classes with a large range
of associated mobilities. To minimize the possibility of “wrap
around”, the quadrupole was set to transmit a narrow m/z range (m/z 870–920), thereby reducing the range of mobilities of ions
entering the cIM device. To understand the contribution of quadrupole
isolation to the results, initial experiments compared the number
of proteins detected in m/z range
870–920 with and without quadrupole isolation following a single
pass of the cIM (Table S7, Supporting Information). Thirteen proteins were detected both with and without quadrupole
isolation, with 11 uniquely observed with quadrupole isolation and
four uniquely observed without. We subsequently compared the results
obtained following one, two, and three passes around the cIM of the m/z selected range of ions Figure A shows a comparison of the
2D heat-maps obtained from the one-, two-, and three-pass experiments.
Three protein-containing ROIs can be observed below the hemoglobin
trend line in the single-pass heat-map, with four observed for the
multipass heat-maps. For the multipass (n = 3) experiment,
some of the more mobile protein ions were detected “above”
the hemoglobin trendline (highlighted by ROI 5 in Figure A). This observation is rationalized
by the fact that in this acquisition some ions in ROI 5 completed
four passes around the cIM. Figure B shows a Venn diagram summarizing the numbers of proteins
detected. (Note that the five proteins detected in the n = 1 and n = 2 experiments but “missing”
in the n = 3 experiment are all of low molecular
weight (<6.3 kDa) and may have completed four passes, but their
signals are obscured by larger proteins. The two proteins detected
solely in the n = 2 experiment are of very low abundance).
In total, 54 proteins were detected after three passes, 37 after two
passes, and 24 after one pass (Tables S8–S10, Supporting Information). The mass spectra extracted from the
ROIs are shown in Figures S2–S4 of the Supporting Information.
Figure 4
LESA multipass (n = 1,
2, and 3) cIM-MS, with
quadrupole isolation of m/z 870–920
of rat kidney tissue. (A) 2D heat-map (arrival time vs m/z) obtained from one pass (left), two passes (middle),
and three passes (right). Hb indicates region of interest containing
hemoglobin ions. Regions of interest (ROIs) containing peaks corresponding
to proteins are highlighted. (B) Venn diagram comparing the proteins
detected following different number of passes of the cIM.
LESA multipass (n = 1,
2, and 3) cIM-MS, with
quadrupole isolation of m/z 870–920
of rat kidney tissue. (A) 2D heat-map (arrival time vs m/z) obtained from one pass (left), two passes (middle),
and three passes (right). Hb indicates region of interest containing
hemoglobin ions. Regions of interest (ROIs) containing peaks corresponding
to proteins are highlighted. (B) Venn diagram comparing the proteins
detected following different number of passes of the cIM.The improvements in resolution resulting from multipass separation
can be illustrated by comparing the ATDs extracted for several narrow m/z ranges (Figure S5, Supporting Information). In each case, the separation between
different ion mobility peaks increases with an increasing number of
passes, revealing new features.
Conclusion
The
results show that the inclusion of high resolution cIM separations
in the LESA MS workflow increases the number of proteins detected
from mouse brain and rat kidney tissues. Single-pass cIM-MS resulted
in detection of 30 proteins from mouse brain tissue and 81 proteins
from rat kidney tissue (compared with 16 and 19, respectively, when
the ion mobility dimension was not considered). The cIM-MS mass spectrum
obtained from mouse brain tissue was dominated by signals corresponding
to singly charged ions; to address this issue, the quadrupole was
set to remove ions with m/z below
600. While this improved the numbers of features detected, further
analysis revealed that the majority of these peaks corresponded to
lower molecular weight peptides or additional charge states of previously
detected proteins. A novel feature of the cIM device is the facility
for multipass separations and therefore improved ion mobility resolving
power. Multipass (n = 1, 2, 3) cIM-MS, coupled with
a narrow quadrupole isolation (50 m/z), of the rat kidney sample improved S/N and resulted in the detection
of 24, 37, and 54 proteins, respectively. In the present experiments,
the LESA samples were pooled, and future work is needed to determine
sensitivity and potential for spatial specificity. The results presented
are also of relevance to more traditional experiments in which protein
extraction follows tissue homogenization.
Authors: Kevin Giles; Steven D Pringle; Kenneth R Worthington; David Little; Jason L Wildgoose; Robert H Bateman Journal: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom Date: 2004 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Joscelyn Sarsby; Rian L Griffiths; Alan M Race; Josephine Bunch; Elizabeth C Randall; Andrew J Creese; Helen J Cooper Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2015-06-22 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Kevin Giles; Jakub Ujma; Jason Wildgoose; Steven Pringle; Keith Richardson; David Langridge; Martin Green Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Daniel J Ryan; Nathan Heath Patterson; Nicole E Putnam; Aimee D Wilde; Andy Weiss; William J Perry; James E Cassat; Eric P Skaar; Richard M Caprioli; Jeffrey M Spraggins Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Rebecca L Edwards; Andrew J Creese; Mark Baumert; Paul Griffiths; Josephine Bunch; Helen J Cooper Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 6.986
Authors: Joscelyn Sarsby; Nicholas J Martin; Patricia F Lalor; Josephine Bunch; Helen J Cooper Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: John G Swales; Nicole Strittmatter; James W Tucker; Malcolm R Clench; Peter J H Webborn; Richard J A Goodwin Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-11-24 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Klaudia I Kocurek; Leanne Stones; Josephine Bunch; Robin C May; Helen J Cooper Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 3.109
Authors: Emilio S Rivera; Katerina V Djambazova; Elizabeth K Neumann; Richard M Caprioli; Jeffrey M Spraggins Journal: J Mass Spectrom Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 1.982
Authors: Elizabeth K Neumann; Katerina V Djambazova; Richard M Caprioli; Jeffrey M Spraggins Journal: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 3.262
Authors: Jared B Shaw; Dale A Cooper-Shepherd; Darren Hewitt; Jason L Wildgoose; Joseph S Beckman; James I Langridge; Valery G Voinov Journal: Anal Chem Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 6.986