Corn stalk as starting material to prepare a novel adsorbent via SET-LRP and its adsorption performance for Pb(II) and Cu(II).

Corn stalk was used as the initial material to prepare a corn stalk matrix-g-polyacrylonitrile-based adsorbent. At first, the corn stalk was treated with potassium hydroxide and nitric acid to obtain the corn stalk-based cellulose (CS), and then the CS was modified by 2-bromoisobutyrylbromide (2-BiBBr) to prepare a macroinitiator. After that, polyacrylonitrile (PAN) was grafted onto the macroinitiator by single-electron transfer living radical polymerization (SET-LRP). A novel adsorbent AO CS-g-PAN was, therefore, obtained by introducing amidoxime groups onto the CS-g-PAN with hydroxylamine hydrochloride (NH2OH · HCl). FTIR, SEM and XPS were applied to characterize the structure of AO CS-g-PAN. The adsorbent was then employed to remove Pb(II) and Cu(II), and it exhibited a predominant adsorption performance on Pb(II) and Cu(II). The effect of parameters, such as temperature, adsorption time, pH and the initial concentration of metal ions on adsorption capacity, were examined in detail during its application. Results suggest that the maximum adsorption capacity of Pb(II) and Cu(II) was 231.84 mg g-1 and 94.72 mg g-1, and the corresponding removal efficiency was 72.03% and 63%, respectively. The pseudo-second order model was more suitable to depict the adsorption process. And the adsorption isotherm of Cu(II) accorded with the Langmuir model, while the Pb(II) conformed better to the Freundlich isotherm model.

Introduction

Recently, heavy class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">metal ions have received considerable concern as the main source of the aquatic environmental pollution due to their high an class="Disease">toxicity class="Chemical">and non-biodegradable [1,2]. Heavy an class="Chemical">metal ions can seriously damage the human central nervous system and organisms [3,4]. Overexposure to lead causes stomach ache, headache, trembling, nervous irritability, severe convulsions and even death. Excessive copper ions can cause serious damage to people's liver and gall-bladder [5]. A tremendous amount of effort has been made to develop technologies for removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater, such as reverse osmosis chemical precipitation, photocatalysis technology, adsorption and membrane filtration [6-9]. Among all these technologies, adsorption is predominant in the sewage disposal process because of its great performance in energy saving and high efficiency [10]. Although adsorption technology is a preferred method for heavy metal ions removal, its widespread use is restricted due to the large cost and high regeneration capital [11]. A large number of attempts have been made to develop comparatively cheap materials to prepare low-cost adsorbents [12-14]. Biological macromolecules such as chitosan and cellulose are considered to be the ideal raw material for adsorbent because of their low-cost and comprehensive sources [15-17]. Currently, a wide variety of crop residue including wheat straw [18,19], sweet potato starch [20,21], sunflower leaves [22] and water bamboo husk [23] have been used as raw materials for the adsorbent.

Controlled/living class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">radical an class="Chemical">polymerization includes an class="Chemical">nitroxide-mediated radical polymerization (NMRP), reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer polymerization (RAFT) and atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) [24-26], which are the most commonly used methods for surface chemical modification of biopolymers such as cellulose, chitosan and starch. In recent years, there has been a growing concern about the single-electron transfer living radical polymerization (SET-LRP) because of its numerous advantages such as mild reaction, low reaction temperature, facile removal of the catalyst and oxygen insensitivity [27-29].

Research on the class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">adsorbent which treated crop residue as a raw material has been conducted in the past; however, the report pertinent to the an class="Chemical">amidoxime-functionalized an class="Chemical">adsorbent prepared from corn stalk by SET-LRP and used for removal of Pb(II) and Cu(II) remains limited. As the main agricultural residue, corn stalk consists mainly of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin, of which the cellulose content is 39%. Corn stalk could be observed to have a condensed composition of fibre structure under a scanning electron microscope; it has a reported fibre length of 1.32 mm, fibre width of 24.3 mm, lumen width of 24.3 mm and cell wall thickness of 6.8 mm [30]. Cellulose contains a high amount of hydroxyl groups which can chelate with heavy metal ions. However, the interaction between hydroxyl groups and heavy metal ions is weak; in order to increase its adsorption ability, some specific functional groups have to be introduced to the surface of corn stalk using hydroxyl groups [31-38]. On such a basis, this study researched the preparation of a corn stalk-g-polyacrylonitrile-based adsorbent via SET-LRP and verified its application for adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II) from wastewater. This study intends to make contributions to solving the water pollution caused by heavy metal ions by means of transforming agricultural residues into adsorbent, avoiding the pollution due to stalk burning, and treating aqueous solution pollution effectively.

Materials and methods

Corn (class="Chemical">an class="Species">maize) stalk was collected from a farm in Qiqihar city, Hei Longjiang Province (China). n class="Chemical">Acrylonitrile (class="Chemical">AN) was purchased from Tianjin Fuchen Chemical Reagents (Tianjin, China). an class="Chemical">N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), methanol and trimethylamine (TEA) were supplied by Kermel Chemistry (Tianjin, China). Ethanol and nitric acid were obtained from Tianli Chemical Reagents (Tianjin, China). 4-Dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), N,N,N′,N″,N″-pentamethyldlethylenetrlamlne (PMDETA), 2-bromoisobutyrylbromide (2-BiBBr) and Cu(0) powder were bought from Aladdin Chemistry (Shanghai, China). Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was recorded on a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum One B type to determine the groups which were introduced onto the surface of the adsorbents. Surface morphologies of samples were observed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, S-3400). The elemental composition was analysed by a Vario EL cube elemental analyser. The definition of the total exchange capacity (TEC) was given on the basis of the content of bromine and nitrogen on the surface of samples. TEC values were calculated according to the following equations:and

Thermogravimetric class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">cun>rves of corn stalk powder, grafted an class="Chemical">polymer class="Chemical">and an class="Chemical">adsorbent were examined by an STA449F3 synchronous thermal analyser. The ICE-3500 atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) was used to measure the concentration of heavy metal ions. The point of the zero charge (pHpzc) of the adsorbent was measured using the solid addition method [39]. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area and pore structure parameters of the adsorbent were determined from the nitrogen adsorption/desorption measurement at 77 K with an Autosorb-iQ surface analyser (Quantachrome Instruments, USA); samples were degassed at 120°C to remove the gases.

Preparation of adsorbent AO CS-g-PAN

The absorbent class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">AO CS-g-PAn class="Chemical">N was prepared according to the synthetic routes showed in scheme 1, ann>d the corresponding procedures were demonstrated in detail as follows.

Scheme 1.

Synthetic routes for the preparation of AO CS-g-PAN.

Synthetic routes for the preparation of class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">AO CS-g-PAn class="Chemical">N.

Pretreatment of corn stalk

Corn stalks were washed with distilled class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">water after removing leaves, then dried at 50°C, after which the clean corn stalks were crushed into granules. Then, 4.5 g of the corn stalk powder was soaked at first in 150 ml of 15% n class="Chemical">KOH solution for 2 h at 50°C and later filtered. Then, the filtered product was stirred in 200 ml of 1 mol l−1 HNO3 at 70°C for 1 h. After a while, the mixture was washed and dried, eventually obtaining the corn stalk-based cellulose (class="Chemical">CS).

Preparation of corn stalk macroinitiator

A total of 2.0 g of class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">CSn> was added to 30 ml of an class="Chemical">DMF, ultrasonicated for 10 min. After that, the mixture was transferred to a triple neck bottle. Then, 2.2 g of an class="Chemical">DMAP and 2.0 g of TEA were added to the triple neck bottle, which was cooled with an ice bath. And then, 2.5 ml of 2-BiBBr dissolved in 10 ml of DMF was added dropwise into the mixture. The triple neck bottle should be charged with nitrogen and stirred for 40 min in the ice water bath. Even more, the mixture was continuously stirred at room temperature for 24 h. When reaching the required time, the product was precipitated with ethanol and further washed with methanol/distilled water three times. Finally, the product was dried at 60°C to form a constant mass and it was named macroinitiator CS-Br.

Preparation of CS-g-PAN by surface polymerization of acrylonitrile using CS-Br via SET-LRP

class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">Polymern>ization process was operated by the following procedure. an class="Chemical">Cu(0) (0.032 g) class="Chemical">and an class="Chemical">PMDETA (0.173 g) were mixed with 20 ml of DMF, the mixture was added into a two-necked flask, bubbled with N2 to eliminate oxygen. Continuously, the macroinitiator CS-Br (0.6 g) and AN (8 g) were added into the flask in succession. After undergoing N2–vacuum–N2 cycles three times, the sealed flask was charged with N2 and the mixture was stirred under the nitrogen atmosphere for 24 h at 60°C [40]. After a defined time, the mixture was filtered and dried until it reached a constant weight at 60°C, in which way CS-g-PAN was obtained.

Synthesis of adsorbent based on CS-g-PAN using NH2OH · HCl

In a typical procedure, a total of 2.0 g class="Chemical">NH2OH · n class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">HCl was dissolved in a 50 ml of class="Chemical">nn> class="Chemical">methanol. An exact 1.2 g of CS-g-PAN and hydroxylamine solution were transferred to a two-necked, round-bottomed flask, and then stirred for 2 h, after which the pH of mixture was adjusted to 9 with sodium hydroxide, and the reaction maintained at 65°C for 24 h for reflux condensation. At last, the production was extracted in ethanol for 12 h and dried at 60°C [41-43].

Adsorption experiments

In order to exclass="Chemical">an class="Chemical">amine the adsorption performance for n class="Gene">Pb(II) and Cu(II) of the absorbent, batch adsorption experiments were carried out on a model BETS-M1 shaker (Kylin-Bell Lab Instruments Co., Ltd, China) with a shaking speed of 120 r.p.m. In a general procedure, 10 mg of class="Chemical">adsorbent was added to 20 ml of 2.0 × 10−3 mol l−1 an class="Chemical">metal ions solution with constant shaking for 24 h at 303.15 K. The effect of pH value on adsorption was studied as pH ranged from 2 to 7. The effect of temperature on adsorption was researched at 293.15, 298.15, 303.15, 308.15, 313.15 and 318.15 K.

Considering the effect of class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">metal ion loss caused by an class="Chemical">glass bottles adsorption on the performance of an class="Chemical">AO CS-g-PAN, the control experiment without adsorbent was carried out in the same circumstances to determine the amount of metal ions adsorbed by the glass bottles. And all the data of adsorption experiments have eliminated the error caused by the adsorption of glass bottles.

The adsorption kineticlass="Chemical">an class="Chemical">csn> were carried out with the initial concentration of 414.4 mg l−1 for an class="Chemical">Pb(II) class="Chemical">and 128 mg l−1 for an class="Chemical">Cu(II) at 303.15 K. Adsorption isotherm was conducted with initial concentrations ranging from 20 to 200 mg l−1 for Pb(II) and from 15 to 130 mg l−1 for Cu(II). And then, the concentration of Pb(II) and Cu(II) was detected by AAS. The amount of the metal ion at equilibrium was estimated by using the following equation:where (mg g−1) is the equilibrium adsorption amount; (mg l−1) and C (mg l−1) are the initial concentration and final concentration of metal ions, respectively; W (g) is the weight of the adsorbent; and V (l) is the volume of solution. In the adsorption experiments, all samples were performed three times and averaged the adsorption capacity.

Results and discussion

FTIR analysis

As shown in figure 1, compared with the spectrum of class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">CS in figure 1a, the spectrum of partial acylation an class="Chemical">CS shows a new band at 1740 cm−1 in figure 1b, which corresponds to the vibration of the an class="Chemical">carbonyl in the ester group of CS-Br. It proved that the macroinitiator CS-Br has been prepared successfully. As shown in figure 1c, a new band emerged at 2242 cm−1 after grafting, which was attributed to the vibration of cyano groups confirmed the success of graft polymerization. Compared with figure 1c, the spectra of AO CS-g-PAN was shown in figure 1d where the success of CS-g-PAN modification was verified by both the disappearance of the bands at 2244 cm−1 attributed to cyano groups and the emergence of two characteristic vibrations at both 1652 and 928 cm−1, respectively, related to the stretching vibration of the C–N and N–O bonds of the amidoxime groups [44].

Figure 1.

FTIR spectra of samples (a) CS, (b) CS-Br, (c) CS-g-PAN, and (d) AO CS-g-PAN.

FTIR spectra of samples (a) class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">CSn>, (b) an class="Chemical">CS-Br, (c) an class="Chemical">CS-g-PAN, and (d) AO CS-g-PAN.

Morphology analysis

The surface morphologies of (a) corn stalk, (b) class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">CS, (c) an class="Chemical">CS-g-PAN class="Chemical">and (d) an class="Chemical">adsorbent AO CS-g-PAN are exhibited in figure 2. Some fibre bundles can be clearly seen in figure 2a. Compared with the original ones, the structure and morphology of the processed corn stalk have been obviously changed after being treated with potassium hydroxide and nitric acid; the fibre bundles were destroyed in the pretreatment reactions so that more hydroxyl groups became exposed, which is favourable to subsequent reactions, including the acylation, graft and adsorption processes. It also illustrated that the corn stalk-based cellulose was made accessible. As shown in figure 2c,d, after graft modifying, the smooth surface of corn stalk became coarse, which proved the successful preparation of CS-g-PAN. The morphology of AO CS-g-PAN observed by SEM was similar to that of CS-g-PAN, but it has a looser structure, which was advantageous to the adsorption of metal ions.

Figure 2.

SEM micrographs of (a) corn stalk, (b) CS, (c) CS-g-PAN, and (d) AO CS-g-PAN.

SEM micrographs of (a) corn stalk, (b) class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">CSn>, (c) an class="Chemical">CS-g-PAN, class="Chemical">and (d) an class="Chemical">AO CS-g-PAN.

Thermal degradation behaviours analysis

The thermal decomposition behaviour of corn class="Chemical">and an class="Chemical">adsorbent were dean class="Chemical">tected by a synchronous thermal analyser, and the diagram is shown in figure 3. As shown in figure 3a, the results revealed two platforms of the two samples in the decomposition process. The initial decomposition platform was between 50 and 200°C (56°C for stalk and 192°C for AO CS-g-PAN) caused by the loss of small molecules and monomers. By contrast, the second degradation showed a significant difference. Because of the degradation of cellulose and deacetylation, the second weight loss process emerged in the range of 200–370°C. In comparison with corn stalk, the second degradation of AO CS-g-PAN was conducted at a lower decomposition temperature, which can be ascribed to the cleavage of the C–O bond formed by the acylation reaction during the preparation of the macroinitiator. As we can see in figure 3b, Tmax of corn stalk and AO CS-g-PAN were 330°C and 350°C, respectively. It was important to highlight that the mass loss of corn stalk was approximately 95%, while the mass loss of AO CS-g-PAN was only 70%, the lower mass loss of AO CS-g-PAN demonstrated its higher thermal stability [45-47].

Figure 3.

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) diagram (a) and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) (b) of corn stalk and AO CS-g-PAN.

Thermogravimetric class="Chemical">analysis (TGA) diagram (a) n class="Chemical">and derivative thermogravimetry (DTG) (b) of corn stalk and an class="Chemical">AO CS-g-PAN.

Elemental analysis

In order to further demonstrate the success of the modification, the Vario EL class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">cube elemental class="Chemical">analyser was used to determine the amount of elements on the surface of the samples, and the result of the elemental analysis is given in table 1. After graft modification, the content of N element increased from 0 to 19.16%, demonstrating that the n class="Chemical">acrylonitrile monomer had been grafted onto the surface of the macroinitiator. After the introduction of the amide oxime group, the content of O element increased from 9.3 to 30.56%, which proved that the preparation of the adsorbent was successful. The content of the organic groups on the surface of the modified corn stalks was further calclass="Chemical">culated from an class="Chemical">TEC of bromine and nitrogen. As depicted, there were 0.074 mmol g−1 of bromine, 13.67 mmol g−1 of cyano groups and 3.34 mmol g−1 of amidoxime groups in CS-Br, CS-g-PAN and AO CS-g-PAN, respectively.

Table 1.

Elemental analysis results of functionalized corn stalk.

sample	O (%)	Br (%)	N (%)	TEC (mmol g−1)
CS-Br	40.28	0.59	—	0.074
CS-g-PAN	9.3	—	19.16	13.67
AO CS-g-PAN	30.56	—	9.35	6.68

Elemental class="Chemical">analysis results of functionalized corn stalk.

Surface area and pore size distribution

Surface area class="Chemical">and porosity of an class="Chemical">CS and an class="Chemical">AO CS-g-PAN were determined by an class="Chemical">nitrogen adsorption/desorption method and the related important parameters are summarized in table 2. Based on the BET surface area of the obtained material, it does have a small surface and low porosity. The result was consistent with previous research reported by Gedam & Dongre [48], who synthesized adsorbents using chitosan and used them to remove Pb(II) from aqueous solution; the adsorbent prepared by Gedam & Dongre had a BET surface area of 0.87 m2 g−1 and pore diameter of 9.77 nm. A small surface area and almost low porosity are characteristics of natural polymer materials, such as cellulose and chitosan, but they have been used as adsorbents in the literature because of their low cost and wide availability, and the results show that their performance in metal ions removal is satisfactory [40,44].

Table 2.

Pore structure parameters of CS and AO CS-g-PAN.

sample	SBET (m2 g−1)	Vtot (cm3 g−1)	pore width (nm)
CS	2.813	0.084	15.044
AO CS-g-PAN	0.72	0.013	30.767

Pore structure parameters of class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">CSn> class="Chemical">and n class="Chemical">AO CS-g-PAN.

It could be found that the graft modification actually decreased the specific surface area class="Chemical">and the pore volume due to the blockage of internal porosity by a grafted chain of an class="Chemical">polyacrylonitrile (Pan class="Chemical">AN). It was also observed that graft modification resulted in an increase in average pore diameter, indicating that the blocked pores would be micropores [49]. For the pure physical adsorption process, the adsorption capacity increases with the increasing surface area of the adsorbent [50]. Note that the untreated corn stalk was also investigated as an adsorbent for comparison in our initial adsorption performance test. Results suggest that the maximum adsorption capacity of AO CS-g-PAN on Pb(II) and Cu(II) were 231.84 and 94.72 mg g−1, respectively, which is much higher than CS with the maximum adsorption capacity 64.5 and 28.32 mg g−1. Therefore, it is speculated that the physisorption of AO CS-g-PAN for Pb(II) and Cu(II) is restricted, and the chemisorption is the predominant adsorption mechanism due to the existence of adsorption sites amidoxime groups which effective bind heavy metal ions.

XPS spectrum analysis

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to further exclass="Chemical">an class="Chemical">amine the adsorption mechanism. As shown in figure 4, there were main peaks C1s, O1s and N1s shown in the XPS wide-scan spectra of n class="Chemical">AO CS-g-PAN before and after loaded Cu(II) and Pb(II) [45]; furthermore, characteristic peaks emerged after the adsorption belonging to class="Chemical">Pb4f (4f7/2 138.54 eV, 4f5/2 143.42 eV) class="Chemical">and an class="Chemical">Cu2p (2p3/2 933.98 eV, 2p1/2 953.6 eV), respectively, which indicated that the Pb(II) and Cu(II) have been adsorbed successfully. Moreover, the O1s spectrum and N1s spectrum of the adsorbent before and after the loaded metal ions are depicted in figures 5 and 6 separately. The O1s peak of AO CS-g-PAN could be deconvoluted into four individual components: 533.3, 532.6, 531.9 and 531.2 eV assigned to O–C = O, C–O–C, C–O–H, and C = O and N–O (C = O peak and N–O peak coincided at 531.2 eV), respectively [37]. The N1s peak of AO CS-g-PAN could be deconvoluted into three individual components: 399.9, 399.5 and 398.9 eV assigned to –NH2, C–N and N–O (C–N peak and N–O peak coincided at 399.5 eV), and –C = N, respectively. After adsorption, the peak of C–O–H shifted from 531.9 to 532.1 eV, and the peak of –NH2 shifted from 399.9 to 400.0 eV, which revealed that C–O–H and –NH2 were related to the adsorption process. In addition, new peaks at 530.5 and 531.4 eV in figure 5b,c, and 400.8 and 401.1 eV in figure 6b,c corresponding to O–Cu, O–Pb, C–N–Cu and C–N–Pb were observed [51], suggesting that Cu(II) and Pb(II) were chemically adsorbed to the adsorbent surface which N and O were likely to play the most important role in the adsorption of metals on AO CS-g-PAN from the XPS analysis [52].

Figure 4.

XPS spectra of (a) AO CS-g-PAN before and after adsorption, high resolution peaks of (b) Cu2p and (c) Pb4f.

Figure 5.

XPS spectra of O1s of (a) adsorbent and after loaded (b) Cu(II) and (c) Pb(II).

Figure 6.

XPS spectra of N1s of (a) adsorbent and after loaded (b) Cu(II) and (c) Pb(II).

XPS spectra of (a) class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">AO CS-g-PAn class="Chemical">N before ann>d after adsorption, high resolution peaks of (b) an class="Chemical">Cu2p class="Chemical">and (c) an class="Chemical">Pb4f.

XPS spectra of O1s of (a) class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">adsorbentn> class="Chemical">and after loaded (b) n class="Chemical">Cu(II) and (c) class="Chemical">Pb(II).

XPS spectra of class="Chemical">N1s of (a) n class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">adsorbent ann>d after loaded (b) an class="Chemical">Cu(II) class="Chemical">and (c) an class="Chemical">Pb(II).

EDS spectrum analysis

The energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) spectra of the class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">adsorbent before class="Chemical">and after the adsorption of n class="Chemical">Cu(II) and class="Chemical">Pb(II) are shown in figure 7. The an class="Chemical">adsorbent consisted of C, N and O, among which C and O were the main constituent elements. After the adsorption of Cu(II) and Pb(II), there were new peaks appearing in the energy spectra corresponding to Cu(II) and Pb(II), and the absorption intensity of Pb(II) was markedly higher than that of Cu(II). It has been confirmed that the metal ions were loaded onto the surface of the adsorbent successfully.

Figure 7.

EDS spectrum of (a) AO CS-g-PAN and (b) Cu(II) and (c) Pb(II) loaded the adsorbent.

EDS spectrum of (a) class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">AO CS-g-PAn class="Chemical">N ann>d (b) an class="Chemical">Cu(II) class="Chemical">and (c) an class="Chemical">Pb(II) loaded the adsorbent.

Comparison of adsorption capacity property with CS, CS-Br and CS-g-PAN

In order to reveal the adsorption performclass="Chemical">ance of modified corn straw, the adsorption capacities of an class="Chemical">CS, an class="Chemical">CS-Br and CS-g-PAN on Pb(II) and Cu(II) were detected to compare with AO CS-g-PAN. Figure 8 shows the adsorption capacity and metal ions removal efficiency of CS, CS-Br, CS-g-PAN and AO CS-g-PAN. As shown in figure 8, compared with CS, the adsorption capacity of macromolecular initiator has no significant change. After the grafting of polyacrylonitrile, the adsorption capacity was improved, indicating that the cyano group might have some effect on the adsorption process. After further modification, the adsorption capacity of AO CS-g-PAN was further improved, indicating that the amidoxime group played a major role in the adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II). The data suggest that AO CS-g-PAN has great potential to remove heavy metal ions from wastewater.

Figure 8.

Adsorption capacity (a) and metal ions removal efficiency (b) of CS, CS-Br, CS-g-PAN and AO CS-g-PAN.

Adsorption capacity (a) class="Chemical">and n class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">metal ions removal efficiency (b) of class="Chemical">nn> class="Chemical">CS, CS-Br, CS-g-PAN and AO CS-g-PAN.

Effect of pH on adsorption capacity and the characteristics of surface charge

The point of the zero charge (pHpzc) is a very significclass="Chemical">ant indicator which plays a vital role in adsorption phenomena [53]. In order to determine the pHpzc, the pH value in which the electrical charge density of the an class="Chemical">adsorbent surface is zero, 20 mg of an class="Chemical">adsorbent was stirred with 20 ml of 0.1 mol l–1 NaNO3 solution, HNO3 or NaOH were added to the mixture to adjust the pH (pHi) values ranging from 1 up to 9, and the suspensions were stirred for 48 h. The final pH (pHf) of suspensions was measured and the plot pHfinal and pHinitial was obtained.

The effect of initial pH on adsorption of class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">Cu(II) class="Chemical">and n class="Chemical">Pb(II) was explored in the pH range from 2 class="Species">to 7, class="Chemical">and the variation tendencies of the adsorption capacity of the an class="Chemical">AO CS-g-PAN at different pH are exhibited in figure 9a. It illustrates that the adsorption process was pH-dependent. The pHpzc was defined as the pH value in which the final pH value equals the initial pH value. As shown in figure 10, the pHpzc was obtained at the intersection of the fitting line and straight line. Therefore, the pHpzc is 4.13 for adsorbent AO CS-g-PAN. It means that when the pH is 4.13, the total contribution of surface charges is zero. For pH < pHpzc, the surface of material had a positive charge. On the other hand, when the initial pH was lower than 4.13, there was a competitive adsorption between heavy ions and H+; it would inhibit the formation of chelating ligands between metal ions and adsorbent. Whereas for pH > pHpzc, the surface of material carried a negative charge, the electrostatic repulsion became weakened with the increasing of pH, the adsorption sites became activated and the amounts of adsorbed metal ions increased obviously. It can be determined that the largest adsorption capacities were 231.24 and 94.72 mg g−1 at optimum pH 5.0 and 6.0, respectively. However, when the pH exceeds 7, the adsorption capacities declined significantly; it was suspicious to attribute this decrease to the formation of metal hydroxide species [54].

Figure 9.

Effect of (a) pH, (b) temperature on the adsorption capacity of Pb(II) and Cu(II).

Figure 10.

Relationship between pHinitial and pHfinal for pHpzc determination.

Effect of (a) pH, (b) temperature on the adsorption capacity of class="Chemical">an class="Gene">n class="Chemical">Pb(II) and Cu(II).

Relationship between pHinitial class="Chemical">and pHfinal for pHpzc determination.

Effect of temperature

The effect of the temperature on the adsorption of class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">Cu(II) class="Chemical">and n class="Chemical">Pb(II) is displayed in figure 9b. Initially, the adsorption increased with increasing temperature. When the temperature reached 303.15 K, it performed the maximum adsorption capacities of class="Chemical">Cu(II) class="Chemical">and an class="Chemical">Pb(II), but thereafter, the subsequent increase would lead to a decrease in their adsorption capacity. This probably was caused by the thermal energy of metal ion changes with temperature. Initially, thermal energy increased with the rising temperature, giving rise to more probability of binding the metal ions with the vacancies on the adsorbent. But when the thermal vibration of the metal ion was faster than the metal-adsorbent interaction, the metal ion was released back into the solution, resulting in reduced adsorption [55].

Adsorption kinetics

As illustrated in figure 11a, the adsorption capacity increased rapidly with the time in the initial period, class="Chemical">and then presented a much lower adsorption rate until its attaining the adsorption equilibrium. In order to research the rate-controlling steps and the adsorption procedure of an class="Chemical">Cu(II) and n class="Chemical">Pb(II) on the adsorbent, the pseudo-first order model and the pseudo-second order model were used to analyse data of the adsorption kinetics, and the models were defined in the lineal form by using the following equations [56,57]:andwhere is adsorption capacity at the equilibrium, is adsorption capacity at time t, and being first order and second order rates, respectively. Relevant parameters calculated according to above kinetic models are summarized in table 3. After comparing the R2 values of the plots obtained, as shown in figure 11b,c, and based on the correlation coefficient (Pb) and (Cu), it was found out that the adsorption process conformed better to the pseudo-second order model [58], proving the coexistence of adsorption and chemical reaction during the removal process of Cu(II) and Pb(II) [59].

Figure 11.

(a) The adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II) onto adsorbent as a function of time, plots of (b) pseudo-first order kinetics and (c) pseudo-second order kinetics.

Table 3.

Kinetic parameters of pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order models.

	pseudo-first order			pseudo-second order
	k_1 (mg g−1 min−1)	q_m (mg g−1)	R12	k_2 (mg g−1 min−1)	q_m (mg g−1)	R22
Pb(II)	0.0171	235.51	0.9970	0.0005	235.85	0.9991
Cu(II)	0.0173	96.47	0.9963	0.00013	94.43	0.9994

(a) The adsorption of class="Chemical">an class="Gene">n class="Chemical">Pb(II) and Cu(II) onto class="Chemical">nn> class="Chemical">adsorbent as a function of time, plots of (b) pseudo-first order kinetics and (c) pseudo-second order kinetics.

Kinetic parameters of pseudo-first order class="Chemical">and pseudo-second order models.

Adsorption isotherms

In order to illustrate the adsorption relation between the amount of the adsorbed class="Chemical">and the solute concentration, the adsorption experimental data were analysed by the Langmuir model (equation (3.3)) and the Freundlich model (equation (3.4)), respectively [60].andwhere is the equilibrium adsorption capacity, is the maximum adsorption capacity, is the equilibrium concentration of the an class="Chemical">metal ions, b is the Langmuir constant related to the binding energy. is the Freundlich constant, and n is the empirical constant which indicates heterogeneity factor. The linear Langmuir isotherm and the Freundlich model are shown in figure 12, class="Chemical">and the parameters are given in table 4. Determined with the correlation coefficient R2, for n class="Chemical">Cu(II), the Freundlich model with R2 value 0.99105 is less suitable for explaining the adsorption process as compared with the Langmuir plot with R2 0.99567. But for class="Chemical">Pb(II), the Freundlich model fitted better as the value of R2 = 0.99328. Both Langmuir class="Chemical">and Freundlich isotherms may adequately describe the same set of data for liquid–solid adsorption over a range of concentrations, especially if the solution concentration is small class="Chemical">and the adsorption capacity of the solid is large enough to make both isotherm equations approach a linear form [50].

Figure 12.

Isotherm plots of (a) Langmuir and (b) Freundlich isotherm.

Table 4.

Constants of Langmuir and Freundlich model for Pb(II) and Cu(II) adsorption on AO CS-g-PAN.

	Langmuir			Freundlich
	q_m (mg g−1)	b (mg l−1)	R2	k_F (mg g−1)	n	R2
Pb(II)	249.19	0.0167	0.98127	10.623	1.655	0.99328
Cu(II)	160	0.0101	0.99567	2.382	1.241	0.99105

Isotherm plots of (a) Lclass="Chemical">angmuir n class="Chemical">and (b) Freundlich isotherm.

Constclass="Chemical">ants of Ln class="Chemical">angmuir and Freundlich model for an class="Gene">Pb(II) and Cu(II) adsorption on n class="Chemical">AO CS-g-PAN.

Recycling studies and comparison of adsorption capacity with other literature

The reusability of class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">adsorbents is class="Chemical">an important factor for the cost reductions in practical application [22,61]. Several adsorption/desorption cycles were performed to evaluate the stability and reusability of the n class="Chemical">adsorbent. For regeneration of the adsorbent, the adsorbent loaded with the class="Chemical">metal ions was treated with 1 mol l−1 an class="Chemical">HCl solutions and then washed with deionized water, and the process was repeated five times. As shown in figure 13, the adsorbent maintained a satisfying adsorption performance even after five cycles, suggesting that the adsorbent exhibited a predominant reusability. Furthermore, it could be observed that the adsorption capacity was reduced gradually, attributed to the loosing of some of the functional groups of the adsorbent due to the acid cleavage [62]. As shown in table 5, the adsorbent AO CS-g-PAN shows excellent adsorption performance compared with other adsorbents which using natural polymers as raw materials and modified by different methods. Based on the satisfactory adsorption capacity and recyclability, the adsorbent AO CS-g-PAN has great potential to treat aqueous solution pollution effectively.

Figure 13.

Different cycles on the adsorption capacity of Pb(II) and Cu(II) by AO CS-g-PAN.

Table 5.

Comparison of the adsorption capacities of various adsorbents for adsorption of Pb(II) and Cu(II) ions from wastewater.

metal ion	adsorbent	qm (mg g−1)	reference
Pb(II)	carboxymethylated cellulose	24.59	[63]
	chitosan beads	34.98	[64]
	epichlorohydrin cross-linked chitosan	34.13	[65]
	chitosan–glutaraldehyde (GLA) beads	14.24	[64]
	chitosan–GLA–citric acid (C-Gch) flake	103.6	[66]
Cu(II)	CS-g-PAN	28.8	[30]
	CS-g-PAM	19.2	[30]

Different cycles on the adsorption capacity of class="Chemical">an class="Gene">Pb(II) and Cu(II) by an class="Chemical">AO CS-g-PAN.

Comparison of the adsorption capacities of various class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">adsorbentn>s for adsorption of an class="Gene">Pb(II) and Cu(II) ions from wastean class="Chemical">water.

Conclusion

In summary, a novel efficient class="Chemical">an class="Chemical">adsorbent an class="Chemical">AO CS-g-PAN with the coarse surface, loose structure class="Chemical">and high adsorption efficiency via SET-an class="Gene">LRP and modification process were successfully prepared. FTIR, SEM and XPS confirmed the successful modification of the adsorbent AO CS-g-PAN. The research on the adsorption properties of AO CS-g-PAN has demonstrated that the adsorption was highly pH-dependent. The maximum adsorption was acquired at the amount of adsorbent is 10 mg, when the reaction temperature was set at 30°C. The kinetics studies uncovered that the adsorption process well abided by the pseudo-second order model. The essential adsorption properties were inspected by the Langmuir model and the Freundlich model, and the results showed that the adsorption of Cu(II) could be explained by the Langmuir isotherm model, while the adsorption of Pb(II) suited the Freundlich isotherm model better. The regeneration experiments suggested the adsorbent was of certain reusability. Based on the above findings, the adsorbent with corn stalk as the raw material can be used extensively as a promising adsorbent in the removal of heavy metal ions from the industrial effluents.