| Literature DB >> 32269655 |
Guillaume Ravé1, Hassane Zouhal2, Daniel Boullosa3,4, Patricia K Doyle-Baker5, Ayoub Saeidi6, Abderraouf Ben Abderrahman7, Jacques-Olivier Fortrat1.
Abstract
Heart Rate Variability (HRV) has been typically used to monitor athletes' physical fitness readiness. The supine position maximizes parasympathetic tone, which is important for monitoring in continuous aerobic sports, however, this is not the case of team sports that rely on anaerobic intermittent bouts, thus increasing sympathetic activation and vagal withdrawal. We hypothesized that HRV during sympathetic activation and vagal withdrawal would be a useful marker to evaluate perceived physical fitness in team sports. HRV was measured in both supine and standing positions during the mornings of 4 match days in 14 professional players. The supine Root Mean Square of the Successive Differences (RMSSD), as well as spectral analysis indices were recorded. Perceived physical fitness was assessed after each match by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS). Supine RMSSD was moderately correlated with perceived physical fitness (rho = 0.416), however, larger correlations were observed for supine and standing spectral indices (rho > 0.5). Correlation between RMSSD and Total Power was very large, thus questioning the usual interpretation of RMSSD (rho > 0.7). Standing Spectral HRV analyses may be a useful method for evaluating perceived physical fitness in the context of team sports. RMSSD may reflect the overall variability of HR and not only the parasympathetic influence, as observed in the current study.Entities:
Keywords: autonomic nervous system; orthostatic test; soccer; training, intermittent sports
Year: 2020 PMID: 32269655 PMCID: PMC7126242 DOI: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0103
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Hum Kinet ISSN: 1640-5544 Impact factor: 2.193
Figure 1Experimental design
Correlation between Physical fitness and Heart Rate Variability.
| Indices | mean ± sd | Spearman r | magnitude | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Fitness (a.u) | 7.8 ± 0.2 | ||||
| Supine | HR (bpm) | 57.1 ± 1.1 | -0.074 | - | ns |
| RMSSD (ms) | 53.2 ± 4.4 | 0.416 | moderate | ** | |
| T (ms2) | 3668.8 ± 521.3 | 0.455 | moderate | ** | |
| VLF (ms2) | 1213.6 ± 182.7 | 0.302 | - | ns | |
| LF (ms2) | 1440.6 ± 194.7 | 0.524 | large | *** | |
| LFnu (n.u) | 58.7 ± 2.2 | 0.390 | moderate | ** | |
| HF (ms2) | 1014.5 ± 200.7 | 0.309 | - | ns | |
| HFnu (n.u) | 41.3 ± 2.2 | -0.396 | moderate | ** | |
| LF/HF | 1.8 ± 0.2 | 0.391 | moderate | ** | |
| Standing | |||||
| HR (bpm) | 71.2 ± 1.5 | -0.090 | - | ns | |
| RMSSD (ms) | 35.1 ± 17.8 | 0,478 | moderate | ** | |
| T (ms2) | 5792.3 ± 608.0 | 0.558 | large | *** | |
| VLF (ms2) | 2776.5 ± 371.5 | 0.477 | moderate | ** | |
| LF (ms2) | 2542.7 ± 259.0 | 0.552 | large | *** | |
| LFnu (n.u) | 85.7 ± 1.2 | -0.064 | - | ns | |
| HF (ms2) | 473.0 ± 76.8 | 0.442 | moderate | ** | |
| HFnu (n.u) | 14.3 ± 1.2 | 0.064 | - | ns | |
| LF/HF | 9.2 ± 1.1 | -0.065 | - | ns | |
Heart rate (HR) and Heart Rate Variability (HRV) indices (mean ± SEM) in the supine and standing positions before a soccer match. The correlation between perceived physical fitness and the HRV index is mentioned as well as the magnitude of the correlation. RMSSD: Root Mean Square of the Successive Differences; TP: Total power; VLF: Very Low Frequency; LF: Low Frequency; HF: High Frequency; nu: normalized units. ns: non-significant, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001
Figure 2Heart rate recording. Heart rate recording of a player during a stand test before a competition match. The stand test included a 10 min supine period followed by a 7 min standing period.
Correlation between RMSSD and spectral parasympathetic indicators.
| Indicators | Spearman | magnitude | slope | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supine | |||||
| TP (ms2) | 0.861 | Very large | *** | + 110.53 | |
| HF (ms2) | 0.938 | Very large | *** | + 40.71 | |
| HFnu (n.u) | 0.024 | - | ns | + 0.06 |
Correlation between several Heart Rate Variability indices derived from time and frequency analyses that are influenced by the parasympathetic nervous system as well as the magnitude of the correlation. Mean and SEM are mentioned in the Table 1. T: Total power; RMSSD: Root Mean Square of the Successive Differences; HF: High Frequency power; HFnu: normalized power of High Frequency domain (n.u.). ns: non-significant, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001