Yu Kuei Lin1, Danielle Groat2, Owen Chan1, Man Hung3, Anu Sharma1, Michael W Varner4, Ramkiran Gouripeddi2, Julio C Facelli2, Simon J Fisher1. 1. Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 2. Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 3. Study Design and Biostatistics Center, Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Abstract
Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems help reduce hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). It remains unclear whether T1D patients with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) continue to develop more hypoglycemia than those with normal hypoglycemia awareness (NA) despite CGM use. Materials and Methods: For this cross-sectional observational study, 99 T1D patients using real-time CGMs for ≥86% of time were recruited. Fifty and 49 patients were found to have NA and IAH (based on the Clarke questionnaire), respectively. Two-week CGM hypoglycemia data were collected. Results: IAH was associated with greater percentages of CGM values <70 and <54 mg/dL (P = 0.012, P = 0.004) compared to NA. Clarke scores correlated positively with the percentage of CGM values <70 and <54 mg/dL (P = 0.013, P = 0.004). IAH was also related to more events with glucose <70 and <54 mg/dL determined either with at ≥1 time point (P = 0.048, P = 0.003) or lasting ≥20 min (P = 0.016, P = 0.004). IAH patients presented with more day-time events with glucose <54 mg/dL (P = 0.015), nocturnal events with glucose levels <70 and <54 mg/dL (P = 0.009, P = 0.007) and longer day-time event duration with glucose levels <70 and <54 mg/dL (P < 0.001, P = 0.006), respectively. Conclusions: T1D patients with IAH continue to experience more hypoglycemia despite dedicated CGM use.
Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems help reduce hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). It remains unclear whether T1D patients with impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) continue to develop more hypoglycemia than those with normal hypoglycemia awareness (NA) despite CGM use. Materials and Methods: For this cross-sectional observational study, 99 T1D patients using real-time CGMs for ≥86% of time were recruited. Fifty and 49 patients were found to have NA and IAH (based on the Clarke questionnaire), respectively. Two-week CGM hypoglycemia data were collected. Results: IAH was associated with greater percentages of CGM values <70 and <54 mg/dL (P = 0.012, P = 0.004) compared to NA. Clarke scores correlated positively with the percentage of CGM values <70 and <54 mg/dL (P = 0.013, P = 0.004). IAH was also related to more events with glucose <70 and <54 mg/dL determined either with at ≥1 time point (P = 0.048, P = 0.003) or lasting ≥20 min (P = 0.016, P = 0.004). IAH patients presented with more day-time events with glucose <54 mg/dL (P = 0.015), nocturnal events with glucose levels <70 and <54 mg/dL (P = 0.009, P = 0.007) and longer day-time event duration with glucose levels <70 and <54 mg/dL (P < 0.001, P = 0.006), respectively. Conclusions: T1D patients with IAH continue to experience more hypoglycemia despite dedicated CGM use.
Entities:
Keywords:
Continuous glucose monitoring; Hypoglycemia; Impaired awareness of hypoglycemia; Type 1 diabetes
Authors: Amelia J Cook; Stephanie N DuBose; Nicole Foster; Emma L Smith; Mengdi Wu; Georgina Margiotta; Michael R Rickels; Jane Speight; Nicole de Zoysa; Stephanie A Amiel Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Louis Monnier; Claude Colette; Anne Wojtusciszyn; Sylvie Dejager; Eric Renard; Nicolas Molinari; David R Owens Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2016-12-30 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Marcus Lind; William Polonsky; Irl B Hirsch; Tim Heise; Jan Bolinder; Sofia Dahlqvist; Erik Schwarz; Arndís Finna Ólafsdóttir; Anders Frid; Hans Wedel; Elsa Ahlén; Thomas Nyström; Jarl Hellman Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-01-24 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Yu Kuei Lin; Danielle Groat; Owen Chan; Man Hung; Anu Sharma; Michael W Varner; Ramkiran Gouripeddi; Julio C Facelli; Simon J Fisher Journal: J Endocr Soc Date: 2019-11-19
Authors: John B Welsh; Peggy Gao; Mark Derdzinski; Sarah Puhr; Terri Kang Johnson; Tomas C Walker; Claudia Graham Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2019-01-25 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Thomas Danne; Revital Nimri; Tadej Battelino; Richard M Bergenstal; Kelly L Close; J Hans DeVries; Satish Garg; Lutz Heinemann; Irl Hirsch; Stephanie A Amiel; Roy Beck; Emanuele Bosi; Bruce Buckingham; Claudio Cobelli; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle; Simon Heller; Roman Hovorka; Weiping Jia; Tim Jones; Olga Kordonouri; Boris Kovatchev; Aaron Kowalski; Lori Laffel; David Maahs; Helen R Murphy; Kirsten Nørgaard; Christopher G Parkin; Eric Renard; Banshi Saboo; Mauro Scharf; William V Tamborlane; Stuart A Weinzimer; Moshe Phillip Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 19.112