Laura G Amar-Dolan1,2, Mary H Horn3, Brianna O'Connell4,5, Susan K Parsons6, Christopher J Roussin7, Peter H Weinstock1,4,2, Robert J Graham1,2. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine. 2. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 3. Retired from Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Boston Children's Hospital Simulator Program, and. 5. Child Life Services, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Department of Pediatrics, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Center for Medical Simulation, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Rationale: Expansion of chronic ventilation options and shared decision-making have contributed to an increasing population of technology-dependent children. One particularly vulnerable group is children with tracheostomy who depend on technology for basic respiratory functions. Chronic critical care is now provided in the homecare setting with implications for family caregivers. Objectives: This study explores the experience of family caregivers of children and young adults with a tracheostomy during the transition from hospital to home care. We sought to identify the specific unmet needs of families to direct future interventions. Methods: We recruited a convenience sample of families from an established home ventilation program to participate in semistructured interviews. Sessions were conducted in person or via teleconference. A grounded-theory qualitative analysis was performed. Results: Between March 2017 and October 2018, we interviewed 13 individuals representing 12 families of children and/or young adults with tracheostomy. Patients ranged in age from 9 months to 28 years, had a tracheostomy for 8 months to 18 years, and represented a variety of underlying diagnoses. Five key themes emerged: 1) navigating home nursing; 2) care coordination and durable medical equipment (DME) impediments; 3) learning as a process; 4) managing emergencies; and 5) setting expectations.Conclusions: Our findings support the need for family-centered discharge processes including coordination of care and teaching focused on emergency preparedness.
Rationale: Expansion of chronic ventilation options and shared decision-making have contributed to an increasing population of technology-dependent children. One particularly vulnerable group is children with tracheostomy who depend on technology for basic respiratory functions. Chronic critical care is now provided in the homecare setting with implications for family caregivers. Objectives: This study explores the experience of family caregivers of children and young adults with a tracheostomy during the transition from hospital to home care. We sought to identify the specific unmet needs of families to direct future interventions. Methods: We recruited a convenience sample of families from an established home ventilation program to participate in semistructured interviews. Sessions were conducted in person or via teleconference. A grounded-theory qualitative analysis was performed. Results: Between March 2017 and October 2018, we interviewed 13 individuals representing 12 families of children and/or young adults with tracheostomy. Patients ranged in age from 9 months to 28 years, had a tracheostomy for 8 months to 18 years, and represented a variety of underlying diagnoses. Five key themes emerged: 1) navigating home nursing; 2) care coordination and durable medical equipment (DME) impediments; 3) learning as a process; 4) managing emergencies; and 5) setting expectations.Conclusions: Our findings support the need for family-centered discharge processes including coordination of care and teaching focused on emergency preparedness.
Entities:
Keywords:
experience; family; home care; qualitative; tracheostomy
Authors: Michael E McCormick; Erin Ward; David W Roberson; Rahul K Shah; Robert J Stachler; Michael J Brenner Journal: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 3.497
Authors: Nancy M Tofil; Chrystal Rutledge; J Lynn Zinkan; Amber Q Youngblood; Julie Stone; Dawn Taylor Peterson; Donna Slayton; Chris Makris; Terri Magruder; Marjorie Lee White Journal: Clin Pediatr (Phila) Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 1.168
Authors: Christopher Hartnick; Gillian Diercks; Vanessa De Guzman; Elizabeth Hartnick; Jeanne Van Cleave; Kevin Callans Journal: Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 1.675
Authors: Robinder G Khemani; Jessica T Lee; David Wu; Edward J Schenck; Margaret M Hayes; Patricia A Kritek; Gökhan M Mutlu; Hayley B Gershengorn; Rémi Coudroy Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Erick Forno; Steven H Abman; Jagdev Singh; Mary E Robbins; Hiran Selvadurai; Paul T Schumacker; Paul D Robinson Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 30.528
Authors: Kimberley J Haines; Elizabeth Hibbert; Nina Leggett; Leanne M Boehm; Tarli Hall; Rita N Bakhru; Anthony J Bastin; Brad W Butcher; Tammy L Eaton; Wendy Harris; Aluko A Hope; James Jackson; Annie Johnson; Janet A Kloos; Karen A Korzick; Pamela Mactavish; Joel Meyer; Ashley Montgomery-Yates; Tara Quasim; Andrew Slack; Dorothy Wade; Mary Still; Giora Netzer; Ramona O Hopkins; Theodore J Iwashyna; Mark E Mikkelsen; Joanne McPeake; Carla M Sevin Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 9.296