| Literature DB >> 32266257 |
Daniel Sobrido-Cameán1, Diego Robledo2, Daniel Romaus-Sanjurjo1, Vanessa Pérez-Cedrón3, Laura Sánchez3, María Celina Rodicio1, Antón Barreiro-Iglesias1.
Abstract
In a recent study, we showed that GABA and baclofen (a GABAB receptor agonist) inhibit caspase activation and promote axon regeneration in descending neurons of the sea lamprey brainstem after a complete spinal cord injury (Romaus-Sanjurjo et al., 2018a). Now, we repeated these treatments and performed 2 independent Illumina RNA-Sequencing studies in the brainstems of control and GABA or baclofen treated animals. GABA treated larval sea lampreys with their controls were analyzed 29 days after a complete spinal cord injury and baclofen treated larvae with their controls 9 days after the injury. One of the most significantly downregulated genes after both treatments was a HES gene (HESB). HES proteins are transcription factors that are key mediators of the Notch signaling pathway and gamma-secretase activity is crucial for the activation of this pathway. So, based on the RNA-Seq results we subsequently treated spinal cord injured larval sea lampreys with a novel gamma-secretase inhibitor (PF-3804014). This treatment also reduced the expression of HESB in the brainstem and significantly enhanced the regeneration of individually identifiable descending neurons after a complete spinal cord injury. Our results show that gamma-secretase could be a novel target to promote axon regeneration after nervous system injuries.Entities:
Keywords: GABA; RNA-Seq; axon regeneration; baclofen; gamma-secretase; lamprey; notch; spinal cord injury
Year: 2020 PMID: 32266257 PMCID: PMC7100381 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol ISSN: 2296-634X
FIGURE 1Experimental design for the RNA-Seq experiments.
FIGURE 2Changes in HESB expression in the brainstem of injured animals after drug treatments. (A) Changes in the expression of HESB in the brainstem of injured animals after GABA or baclofen treatments (RNA-Seq). HESB gene expression is represented as read counts normalized by DESeq’s median of ratios, and ** represents that the differences between the two groups are significant with false discovery rate corrected p-values between 0.01 and 0.001. Note that results are not comparable between the 2 RNA-Seq experiments. (B) Change in the expression of HESB in the brainstem of 1 wpl animals after the PF-3804014 treatment (qPCR). HESB expression is represented as log2 fold change in comparison to the mean of the controls, and * represents that the differences between the two groups are significant with p-value between 0.05 and 0.01. For both A and B, boxplots show the median, 25th and 75th percentiles, red dots represent the mean and whiskers extend to the most extreme data point which is no more than 1.5 times the length of the box away from the box.
FIGURE 3PF-3804014 promotes axon regeneration after a complete SCI. (A) Schematic drawing of a dorsal view of the sea lamprey brainstem showing the location of giant individually identifiable descending neurons (modified from Sobrido-Cameán and Barreiro-Iglesias, 2018). The box marked “E” indicates the spinal cord region shown in Panel E. The line used to count the number of regenerated axons in the spinal cord is also indicated. M, mesencephalon; R, rhombencephalon; SC, spinal cord. (B) Photomicrographs of dorsal views of whole-mounted brains showing regenerated identifiable descending neurons, as identified by retrograde tracer labeling, in control and PF-3804014 treated animals. Note the increased number of labeled (regenerated) identifiable neurons in PF-3804014 treated animals. (C) Graph showing significant changes (asterisk) in the percentage of regenerated identifiable descending neurons per animal (controls: n = 16 animals; PF-3804014 treated: n = 21 animals) after the PF-3804014 treatment (control: 57,22 ± 4.132%; PF-3804014: 68.95 ± 2.354%). (D) Graph showing significant changes (asterisks) in the total number of regenerated neurons after the PF-3804014 treatment (control: 292 neurons regenerated, 252 non-regenerated; PF-3804014: 444 neurons regenerated, 272 non-regenerated). (E) Photomicrographs of whole-mounted spinal cords showing regenerated axons, as identified by tracer labeling, in control and PF-3804014 treated animals. Note the increased number of regenerated axons in PF-3804014 treated animals. The line used to count the number of regenerated axons in the spinal cord is also indicated in white. (F) Graph showing significant changes (asterisk) in the number of regenerated axons per spinal cord after the PF-3804014 treatment (control: 18 ± 1.588 axons, n = 15 animals; PF-3804014: 24.57 ± 1.955 axons, n = 14 animals). Rostral is up and scale bars correspond to 100 μm.