| Literature DB >> 32266150 |
Jian Zhou1,2,3, Liang Zhou2,3, Duo Zhang2,3, Wei-Jing Tang2,3, Di Tang2,3, Xiao-Ling Shi2,3, Yue Yang2,3, Lin Zhou1, Fei Liu1, Yong Yu4, Pentao Liu4, Lei Tao2,3, Li-Ming Lu1.
Abstract
Background: We report functional and clinical data uncovering the significance of B-cell lymphoma/leukemia 11A (BCL11A) in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC).Entities:
Keywords: BCL11A; LSCC; MDM2; prognosis; proto-oncogene
Year: 2020 PMID: 32266150 PMCID: PMC7098986 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00375
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Representative images of BCL11A-positive staining in LSCC cells (A) and BCL11A– negative staining in LSCC sections (B). (C) A Western blot revealed low expression in the AMC-HN-8 cells. HEC-1-B was used as the positive control for BCL11A expression. (D,E) BCL11A overexpression in the AMC-HN-8 cells confirmed by qRT-PCR and Western blot analyses. **P < 0.01.
Relationship between BCL11A expression and tissue types.
| Paracancer tissue | 40 | 25 | 15 (37.5%) | ||
| Carcinoma | 69 | 17 | 52 (75.4%) | 5.1 (2.20–11.84) | <0.01 |
Relationship between BCL11A expression and clinicopathological characteristics.
| <60 | 19 | 5 (26.3%) | 14 (73.7%) | 1.13 (0.34–3.79) | 0.842 |
| ≥60 | 50 | 12 (24%) | 38 (76%) | ||
| Never | 20 | 3 (15%) | 17 (85%) | 0.44 (0.11–1.75) | 0.235 |
| Former or current | 49 | 14 (28.6%) | 35 (71.4%) | ||
| Never | 34 | 5 (14.7%) | 29 (85.3%) | 0.33 (0.10–1.07) | 0.093 |
| Former or current | 35 | 12 (34.3%) | 23 (65.7%) | ||
| N0 | 31 | 12 (38.7%) | 19 (61.3%) | 4.2 (1.27–12.65) | 0.023 |
| N1–2 | 38 | 5 (13.2%) | 33 (86.8%) | ||
| Initial (I + II) | 14 | 6 (42.9%) | 8 (57.1%) | 3 (0.86–10.45) | 0.076 |
| Advanced (III+IV) | 55 | 11 (20%) | 44 (80%) | ||
| Survivors | 36 | 16 (44.4%) | 20 (55.6%) | 12 (1.43–100.8) | 0.009 |
| Deceased or recurrence | 16 | 1(6.3%) | 15 (93.7%) | ||
Figure 2(A) BCL11A overexpression increased AMC-HN-8 cell proliferation. (B) Overexpression of BCL11A in the AMC-HN-8 cells significantly increased their colony-forming abilities. (C) Quantitative comparison of the colonies formed from the parental AMC-HN-8 cells (NC) and the BCL11A overexpression (BCL11A) ones. *P < 0.05.
Figure 3The migration/ invasion ability of LSCC cells with overexpression in the transwell assay. (A) Increased migration capability of BCL11A-overexpression AMC-HN-8 cells detected by the transwell assay. Images showing the migrated AMC-HN-8 cells on the lower surface of the transwell membranes. Magnification ×200. (B) The numbers of migrated AMC-HN-8 cells in five random fields under the microscope (mean ± SD, n = 5). (C) Increased invasion capability of BCL11A-overexpression AMC-HN-8 cells. Images showing the invaded BCL11A-overexpresing AMC-HN-8 cells on lower surface of the transwell membranes in different groups. Magnification ×200. (D) The number of invaded BCL11A-overexpressing AMC-HN-8 in five random fields under the microscope (mean ± SD, n = 5). **P < 0.01.
Figure 4(A) Influence of different concentrations of cisplatin on the cytotoxicity of negative controls (NC) AMC-HN-8 and overexpression BCL11A AMC-HN-8 cell strains. (B) Cell cycle investigation, showing that overexpression did not affect cell cycle kinetics in the two cell lines. The data are the mean ± s.d. (n = 3).*P < 0.05.
Figure 5BCL11A regulated AMC-HN-8 cell growth in vivo. (A) Images of mice with xenograft tumors of BCL11A-overexpression AMC-HN-8 cells and the control cells (NC); (B) Image of tumors isolated from nude mice. (C) Growth curves of the xenografts in the BCL11A-overexpression AMC-HN-8 cell group and control cells (NC) (n = 5, mean ± SEM). (D) Comparison of the weight of the xenografts in the BCL11A-overexpression AMC-HN-8 cells and control cells (NC) harvested 18 d after injection of the cells (n = 5, mean ± SEM). *P < 0.05.
Figure 6(A–D) Co-expression of BCL11A and MDM2 in some LSCCs, as shown by immunohistochemistry. (E) Linear regression analysis of BCL11A vs. MDM2 expression levels (immunohistochemistry scores in the same TMA). (F) The Western blot showed that MDM2 was up-regulated in the BCL11A overexpression AMC-HN-8 cell line at the protein level. (G) PCR microarray investigation of human cancer pathway genes in the BCL11A-overexpression AMC-HN-8 cells. 3D profile graph displays the fold change in the expression of each gene in the BCL11A-overexpression AMC-HN-8 cells vs. that of the control cells. Columns pointing up (with z-axis values > 1) indicate up-regulation of gene expression, and the columns pointing down (with z-axis values < 1) denote down-regulation of gene expression. (H) The corresponding scatter plots display the validity of the test and expression level of every gene in the BCL11A-overexpression AMC-HN-8 cells vs. that of the control cells (n = 3). (I) Heat map of the 84 probe sets in BCL11A-overexpression AMC-HN-8 cells vs. that of the control cells. (J) Six selected genes in the BCL11A-overexpression AMC-HN-8 cells showed a significant change at the mRNA level vs. that of the control cells. (K) Western blot verification of the gene expression changes. *P < 0.05.