| Literature DB >> 32266078 |
Reginald Adjetey Annan1, Solomon Adjetey Sowah1, Charles Apprey1, Nana Ama Frimpomaa Agyapong1, Satoru Okonogi2, Taro Yamauchi3, Takeshi Sakurai2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Good nutrition and physical activity of school-aged children are important for ensuring optimum growth and reducing obesity. This present study assessed associations between breakfast consumption, BMI-for-Age (BMI) and physical fitness in a cross-section of school-aged children attending government-owned primary schools in Kumasi, Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: Anthropometry; Breakfast consumption; Ghana; Physical activity; Physical fitness; School-aged children
Year: 2020 PMID: 32266078 PMCID: PMC7114787 DOI: 10.1186/s40795-020-00344-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nutr ISSN: 2055-0928
Anthropometric characteristics of the study population
| Measurement | Boys | Girls | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Age (years) | 11.1 | 1.1 | 11.1 | 1.1 | 11.1 | 1.1 | 0.942 |
| Weight (Kg) | 32.8 | 5.8 | 36.9 | 8.1 | 66.0 | 34.9 | < 0.001 |
| Height (cm) | 140.5 | 7.0 | 144.2 | 8.4 | 163.2 | 142.4 | < 0.001 |
| BMI-for –age z-score | −0.43 | 0.9 | −0.05 | 0.94 | − 0.24 | 0.99 | < 0.001 |
| Height-for-age z-score | −0.51 | 1.0 | −0.17 | 1.0 | −0.33 | 1.1 | 0.001 |
| MUAC (cm) | 20.7 | 7.3 | 22.0 | 3.2 | 21.4 | 5.7 | 0.021 |
Comparison of proportions of thinness, overweight and obese children by gender
| Total | Male | Female | Chi square | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMI categories | Thin | Count | 12 | 9 | 3 | 8.53 | 0.003 |
| % | 2.7% | 4.2% | 1.3% | ||||
| Normal BMI | Count | 380 | 191 | 189 | |||
| % | 86.8 | 89.7% | 84.0% | ||||
| Overweight | Count | 41 | 9 | 32 | |||
| % | 9.4% | 4.2% | 14.2% | ||||
| Obese | Count | 5 | 4 | 1 | |||
| % | 1.1% | 1.9% | 0.4% | ||||
Chi square could not be used for the 4 BMI categories since some cells were small. To do that, the thin and normal were combined while the overweight and obese combined
Physical fitness scores among school age children
| Fitness test | Total | Boys | Girls | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Hand grip (kg) | 4.4 | 2.2 | 4.1 | 2.4 | 4.5 | 1.9 | 0.069 |
| Forward jump (cm) | 4.6 | 2.1 | 4.1 | 2.2 | 5.0 | 1.8 | < 0.001 |
| Sit ups (s) | 3.7 | 2.0 | 3.9 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 1.7 | 0.028 |
| Flexibility (cm) | 1.1 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 0.120 |
| 50 m run (s) | 6.4 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 2.6 | 6.6 | 2.4 | 0.002 |
| Total physical fitness score | 20.1 | 7.3 | 19.2 | 8.3 | 21.0 | 6.2 | 0.012 |
Raw scores have been converted to standard scores ranging from one to ten for age and gender for physical fitness standards for Japanese children. N = 433
Physical fitness category based on total physical activity standard score stratified by gender
| Fitness category | Total | Boys | Girls | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excellent | 99 (22.6) | 54 (25.4) | 45 (20.0) | 0.019* |
| Very good | 100 (22.8) | 43 (20.2) | 57 (25.3) | |
| Average | 69 (15.8) | 24 (11.2) | 45 (20.0) | |
| Poor | 170 (38.8) | 92 (43.2) | 78 (34.7) | |
| Total | 438 | 213 | 225 |
*denotes statistical significance. Standard scores refer to physical fitness standard cut-offs for Japanese children
Comparing individual physical fitness scores by BMI status and their correlations
| Thinness | Normal | Overweight/obese | BMI z-score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | Correlation | |||
| Hand grip (kg) | 3.0 ± 1.9a | 4.3 ± 2.1b | 5.0 ± 2.1c | 0.006* | 0.21 | < 0.001 |
| Forward jump (cm) | 3.6 ± 2.4 | 4.6 ± 2.3 | 4.5 ± 1.7 | 0.235 | 0.06 | 0.199 |
| Sit ups (s) | 4.1 ± 2.0 | 3.7 ± 2.0 | 3.2 ± 1.9 | 0.105 | −0.11 | 0.027 |
| Flexibility (cm) | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.7 | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 0.235 | −0.02 | 0.575 |
| 50 m run (s) | 4.9 ± 2.7 | 6.5 ± 2.5 | 5.6 ± 2.3 | 0.088 | −0.05 | 0.292 |
| Total physical activity score | 16.1 ± 8.5 | 20.3 ± 7.4 | 19.6 ± 5.9 | 0.445 | 0.03 | 0.565 |
Partial correlations are controlled for age. Correlations between fitness scores and MUAC were all not significant and not presented
Breakfast consumption by BMI-for age status, gender and age
| Thin | Normal | Overweight/obesity | Chi square | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breakfast consumption | Yes | Count | 7 | 236 | 33 | 276 | 0.359 | 0.549 |
| % | 77.80% | 78.40% | 82.50% | 78.90% | ||||
| No | Count | 2 | 65 | 7 | 74 | |||
| % | 22.20% | 21.60% | 17.50% | 21.10% | ||||
| Male | Female | 0.366 | 0.601 | |||||
| Yes | Count | 134 | 142 | |||||
| % | 80.20% | 77.60% | ||||||
| No | Count | 33 | 41 | |||||
| % | 19.80% | 22.40% | ||||||
N = 350. Breakfast consumption did not vary between different ages, not presented. Thin and normal children were combined for chi-square analysis between BMI status and breakfast consumption, since some cells were fewer than 5
Differences in average BMI z scores and physical fitness scores between breakfast consumers and non-consumers
| Did you have breakfast before school | Yes | No | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Mean ± SD | ||
| BMI z scores | −0.34C1.0 | − 0.35 ± 1.1 | 0.800 |
| HFA z-score | −0.28 ± 1.1 | −0.24 ± 1.0 | 0.808 |
| Hand grip (kg) | 4.4 ± 2.2 | 4.6 ± 1.8 | 0.277 |
| Forward jump (cm) | 4.6 ± 2.1 | 5.0 ± 1.8 | 0.275 |
| Sit-ups (s) | 3.7 ± 2.0 | 4.0 ± 1.9 | 0.134 |
| Flexibility (cm) | 1.1 ± 0.8 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.087 |
| 50 m run (s) | 6.3 ± 2.5 | 7.0 ± 2.3 | 0.022* |
| Total physical activity score | 20.0 ± 7.5 | 21.6 ± 6.4 | 0.423 |
N = 349
Average BMI z scores and physical fitness scores between those who exercise and those who do not
| Do you exercise? | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No n = 35 | ||
| BMI z-scores | −0.357 ± 0.97 | − 0.171 ± 1.15 | 0.364 |
| Hand grip (kg) | 4.5 ± 2.1 | 3.9 ± 2.3 | 0.148 |
| Forward jump (cm) | 4.7 ± 2.0 | 4.0 ± 2.0 | 0.070 |
| Sit-ups (s) | 3.9 ± 1.9 | 2.9 ± 1.8 | 0.003* |
| Flexibility (cm) | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 2.1 | 0.169 |
| 50 m run (s) | 6.6 ± 2.4 | 5.1 ± 2 | 0.004* |
| Total physical fitness score | 20.6 ± 7.2 | 17.5 ± 7.5 | 0.021* |
n = 346