Literature DB >> 33070266

Parents' Perspectives and Societal Acceptance of Implementation of Newborn Screening for SCID in the Netherlands.

Maartje Blom1,2, Robbert G M Bredius3, Marleen E Jansen2, Gert Weijman4, Evelien A Kemper5, Clementien L Vermont6, Iris H I M Hollink7, Willem A Dik8,9, Joris M van Montfrans10, Mariëlle E van Gijn11, Stefanie S Henriet12, Koen J van Aerde12, Wouter Koole13, Arjan C Lankester3, Eugènie H B M Dekkers14, Peter C J I Schielen2, Martine C de Vries15, Lidewij Henneman16, Mirjam van der Burg17.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: While neonatal bloodspot screening (NBS) for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) has been introduced more than a decade ago, implementation in NBS programs remains challenging in many countries. Even if high-quality test methods and follow-up care are available, public uptake and parental acceptance are not guaranteed. The aim of this study was to describe the parental perspective on NBS for SCID in the context of an implementation pilot. Psychosocial aspects have never been studied before for NBS for SCID and are important for societal acceptance, a major criterion when introducing new disorders in NBS programs.
METHODS: To evaluate the perspective of parents, interviews were conducted with parents of newborns with abnormal SCID screening results (N = 17). In addition, questionnaires about NBS for SCID were sent to 2000 parents of healthy newborns who either participated or declined participation in the SONNET-study that screened 140,593 newborns for SCID.
RESULTS: Support for NBS for SCID was expressed by the majority of parents in questionnaires from both a public health perspective and a personal perspective. Parents emphasized the emotional impact of an abnormal screening result in interviews. (Long-term) stress and anxiety can be experienced during and after referral indicating the importance of uniform follow-up protocols and adequate information provision.
CONCLUSION: The perspective of parents has led to several recommendations for NBS programs that are considering screening for SCID or other disorders. A close partnership of NBS programs' stakeholders, immunologists, geneticists, and pediatricians-immunologists in different countries is required for moving towards universal SCID screening for all infants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Severe combined immunodeficiency; interviews; newborn blood screening; parental perspective; questionnaire study

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33070266      PMCID: PMC7846522          DOI: 10.1007/s10875-020-00886-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0271-9142            Impact factor:   8.317


  43 in total

Review 1.  Expanded newborn screening: social and ethical issues.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Dhondt
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.982

2.  An evaluation of the TREC assay with regard to the integration of SCID screening into the Dutch newborn screening program.

Authors:  Maartje Blom; Ingrid Pico-Knijnenburg; Marja Sijne-van Veen; Anita Boelen; Robbert G M Bredius; Mirjam van der Burg; Peter C J I Schielen
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis - The parent perspective.

Authors:  Corina S Rueegg; Jürg Barben; Gaudenz M Hafen; Alexander Moeller; Maja Jurca; Ralph Fingerhut; Claudia E Kuehni
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Early diagnosis of severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in Turkey: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ceren Can; Şahin Hamilçıkan; Emrah Can
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-08-29

5.  Transplantation outcomes for severe combined immunodeficiency, 2000-2009.

Authors:  Sung-Yun Pai; Brent R Logan; Linda M Griffith; Rebecca H Buckley; Roberta E Parrott; Christopher C Dvorak; Neena Kapoor; Imelda C Hanson; Alexandra H Filipovich; Soma Jyonouchi; Kathleen E Sullivan; Trudy N Small; Lauri Burroughs; Suzanne Skoda-Smith; Ann E Haight; Audrey Grizzle; Michael A Pulsipher; Ka Wah Chan; Ramsay L Fuleihan; Elie Haddad; Brett Loechelt; Victor M Aquino; Alfred Gillio; Jeffrey Davis; Alan Knutsen; Angela R Smith; Theodore B Moore; Marlis L Schroeder; Frederick D Goldman; James A Connelly; Matthew H Porteus; Qun Xiang; William T Shearer; Thomas A Fleisher; Donald B Kohn; Jennifer M Puck; Luigi D Notarangelo; Morton J Cowan; Richard J O'Reilly
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Public support for neonatal screening for Pompe disease, a broad-phenotype condition.

Authors:  Stephanie Shifra Weinreich; Tessel Rigter; Carla Geertruida van El; Wybo Jan Dondorp; Pieter Johannes Kostense; Ans T van der Ploeg; Arnold J J Reuser; Martina Cornelia Cornel; Marloes Louise Catharina Hagemans
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 4.123

7.  Parental knowledge reduces long term anxiety induced by false-positive test results after newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  A M M Vernooij-van Langen; S M van der Pal; A J T Reijntjens; J G Loeber; E Dompeling; J E Dankert-Roelse
Journal:  Mol Genet Metab Rep       Date:  2014-08-13

8.  Newborn Screening for Severe Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases in Sweden-a 2-Year Pilot TREC and KREC Screening Study.

Authors:  Michela Barbaro; Annika Ohlsson; Stephan Borte; Susanne Jonsson; Rolf H Zetterström; Jovanka King; Jacek Winiarski; Ulrika von Döbeln; Lennart Hammarström
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 8.317

9.  Healthcare professionals' and parents' experiences of the confirmatory testing period: a qualitative study of the UK expanded newborn screening pilot.

Authors:  Louise Moody; Lou Atkinson; Isher Kehal; James R Bonham
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.125

10.  First Universal Newborn Screening Program for Severe Combined Immunodeficiency in Europe. Two-Years' Experience in Catalonia (Spain).

Authors:  Ana Argudo-Ramírez; Andrea Martín-Nalda; Jose L Marín-Soria; Rosa M López-Galera; Sonia Pajares-García; Jose M González de Aledo-Castillo; Mónica Martínez-Gallo; Marina García-Prat; Roger Colobran; Jacques G Riviere; Yania Quintero; Tatiana Collado; Judit García-Villoria; Antonia Ribes; Pere Soler-Palacín
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 7.561

View more
  5 in total

1.  Recommendations for uniform definitions used in newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Maartje Blom; Rolf H Zetterström; Asbjørg Stray-Pedersen; Kimberly Gilmour; Andrew R Gennery; Jennifer M Puck; Mirjam van der Burg
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2021-09-16       Impact factor: 14.290

2.  Evaluation of newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID).

Authors:  Rebecca Nightingale; Christine Cavanagh; Andrew R Gennery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 6.302

3.  Mothers' knowledge and attitudes about newborn screening in Jordan.

Authors:  Abedallah Kasem; Nadin M Abdel Razeq; Sawsan Abuhammad; Haneen Alkhazali
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-01-10

4.  Communication of an Abnormal Metabolic New-Born Screening Result in The Netherlands: The Parental Perspective.

Authors:  Sietske Haitjema; Charlotte M A Lubout; Justine H M Zijlstra; Bruce H R Wolffenbuttel; Francjan J van Spronsen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.706

5.  Towards Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS)-Based Newborn Screening: A Technical Study to Prepare for the Challenges Ahead.

Authors:  Abigail Veldman; Mensiena B G Kiewiet; Margaretha Rebecca Heiner-Fokkema; Marcel R Nelen; Richard J Sinke; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Els Voorhoeve; Dineke Westra; Martijn E T Dollé; Peter C J I Schielen; Francjan J van Spronsen
Journal:  Int J Neonatal Screen       Date:  2022-02-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.