| Literature DB >> 32265687 |
Dayana Hayek1,2, Friederike Thams2, Agnes Flöel1,2,3, Daria Antonenko1,2.
Abstract
Age-related deterioration in white and gray matter is linked to cognitive deficits. Reduced microstructure of the fornix, the major efferent pathway of the hippocampus, and volume of the dentate gyrus (DG), may cause age-associated memory decline. However, the linkage between these anatomical determinants and memory retrieval in healthy aging are poorly understood. In 30 older adults, we acquired diffusion tensor and T1-weighted images for individual deterministic tractography and volume estimation. A memory task, administered outside of the scanner to assess retrieval of learned associations, required discrimination of previously acquired picture-word pairs. The results showed that fornix fractional anisotropy (FA) and left DG volumes were related to successful retrieval. These brain-behavior associations were observed for correct rejections, but not hits, indicating specificity of memory network functioning for detecting false associations. Mediation analyses showed that left DG volume mediated the effect of fornix FA on memory (48%), but not vice versa. These findings suggest that reduced microstructure induces volume loss and thus negatively affects retrieval of learned associations, complementing evidence of a pivotal role of the fornix in healthy aging. Our study offers a neurobehavioral model to explain variability in memory retrieval in older adults, an important prerequisite for the development of interventions to counteract cognitive decline.Entities:
Keywords: aging; brain plasticity; hippocampal subfields; tractography; white matter integrity
Year: 2020 PMID: 32265687 PMCID: PMC7098987 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00079
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
Characteristics of participants.
| Age, years | 62 | 6 |
| Education, years | 15 | 2 |
| LQa | 94.3 | 9.3 |
| GDSb | 1.3 | 1.4 |
| Digit Span (max. 14) | ||
| Forward | 7.6 | 2.4 |
| Backward | 6.1 | 1.9 |
| Vocabulary test (max. 37)c | 33.2 | 2.1 |
| Semantic fluency, | 25.3 | 5.6 |
| Boston Naming Test, | 14.7 | 0.5 |
| Mini-Mental State (max. 30) | 29.4 | 0.9 |
| Word list learning, | ||
| Total (max. 30) | 23.3 | 3.0 |
| Trial 1 (max. 10) | 6.2 | 1.5 |
| Trial 2 (max. 10) | 8.1 | 1.3 |
| Trial 3 (max. 10) | 9.1 | 0.9 |
| Word list retrieval, | 8.3 | 1.2 |
| Word list intrusions, | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Figure copying, | 11 | 0.0 |
| Figure retrieval, | 10.7 | 0.8 |
| Phonemic fluency, | 16.1 | 4.1 |
| Trail making test, | ||
| Part A | 38.9 | 10.7 |
| Part B | 79.0 | 20.2 |
FIGURE 1Tractography analysis, hippocampal subfields representation, and their correlation with memory performance. The left panel shows a sagittal and a coronal section of the fornix, and the tactography using ROI waypoints (Leemans et al., 2009) (“SEED” ROI is shown in blue, “AND” ROI is shown in green, and “NOT” ROIs are shown in red) for the fornix in the native space of one participant. The scatter plot shows a positive correlation of fornix FA and percentage of correct rejections, corrected for age (partial r = 0.403, p = 0.030). The right panel shows hippocampal subfields segmentation performed using FreeSurfer v6.0 algorithm. This segmentation resulted in 12 subfields; DG is shown in red and all remaining subfields are shown in colored outline. The scatter plot shows a positive correlation of left DG volume (in mm3) and% correct rejections, adjusted for age (partial r = 0.501, p = 0.006). Note that for both correlations, sensitivity analysis without the low performing participant was conducted and results showed similar partial correlation coefficients (correlation of fornix FA and% correct rejections: r = 0.416, p = 0.028; correlation of left DG volume and % correct rejections: r = 0.449, p = 0.017).
FIGURE 2Mediation analysis investigating the three-way association between left DG volume, Fornix FA and percentage of correct rejections. (A) Mediation analysis (model A) where “a” indicates the effect of fornix FA on left DG volume, “b” indicates the effect of left DG volume on % correct rejections, adjusted for fornix FA, i.e., direct effect of left DG volume on % correct rejections, “c” indicates the direct effect of fornix FA on % correct rejections, and “c” indicates the total effect (direct and indirect) of fornix FA on % correct rejections. (B) Reverse mediation analysis (model B) where “a” indicates the effect of left DG volume on fornix FA, “b” indicates the effect of fornix FA on % correct rejections, adjusted for left DG volume, i.e., direct effect of fornix FA on % correct rejections, “c” indicates the direct effect of left DG volume on % correct rejections, and “c” indicates the total effect (direct and indirect) of left DG volume on % correct rejections. Dashed lines indicate significant paths and bold font indicates significant terms. Bias-corrected 95% CI is displayed for the indirect effects (a∗b).
Mediation analysis models of the three-way association between left DG volume, Fornix FA, and percentage of correct rejections (n = 30).
| Total effect c (fornix FA on % correct rejections) | 3.13 ± 1.37 | 2.28 | 0.030* | |
| a (fornix FA on left DG volume) | 545.31 ± 189.80 | 2.87 | 0.008** | |
| b (left DG volume on % correct rejections) | 0.0028 ± 0.0013 | 2.10 | 0.045* | |
| Mediation effect ab (fornix FA on % correct rejections via left DG volume) | 1.50 ± 1.03 (48) | – | – | |
| Direct effect c′ (fornix FA on % correct rejections) | 1.63 ± 1.47 | 1.10 | 0.279 | |
| Total effect c (left DG volume on % correct rejections) | 0.0035 ± 0.0012 | 3.0 | 0.006** | |
| a (left DG volume on fornix FA) | 0.0004 ± 0.0001 | 2.87 | 0.008** | |
| b (Fornix FA on % correct rejections) | 1.63 ± 1.47 | 1.10 | 0.279 | |
| Mediation effect ab (left DG volume on % correct rejections via Fornix FA) | 0.0007 ± 0.0006 | – | – | −0.0005, 0.0019 |
| Direct effect c′ (left DG volume on % correct rejections) | 0.0028 ± 0.0013 | 2.10 | 0.045* |