Literature DB >> 23507377

Variability in diffusion kurtosis imaging: impact on study design, statistical power and interpretation.

Filip Szczepankiewicz1, Jimmy Lätt, Ronnie Wirestam, Alexander Leemans, Pia Sundgren, Danielle van Westen, Freddy Ståhlberg, Markus Nilsson.   

Abstract

Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) is an emerging technique with the potential to quantify properties of tissue microstructure that may not be observable using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). In order to help design DKI studies and improve interpretation of DKI results, we employed statistical power analysis to characterize three aspects of variability in four DKI parameters; the mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy, mean kurtosis, and radial kurtosis. First, we quantified the variability in terms of the group size required to obtain a statistical power of 0.9. Second, we investigated the relative contribution of imaging and post-processing noise to the total variance, in order to estimate the benefits of longer scan times versus the inclusion of more subjects. Third, we evaluated the potential benefit of including additional covariates such as the size of the structure when testing for differences in group means. The analysis was performed in three major white matter structures of the brain: the superior cingulum, the corticospinal tract, and the mid-sagittal corpus callosum, extracted using diffusion tensor tractography and DKI data acquired in a healthy cohort. The results showed heterogeneous variability across and within the white matter structures. Thus, the statistical power varies depending on parameter and location, which is important to consider if a pathogenesis pattern is inferred from DKI data. In the data presented, inter-subject differences contributed more than imaging noise to the total variability, making it more efficient to include more subjects rather than extending the scan-time per subject. Finally, strong correlations between DKI parameters and the structure size were found for the cingulum and corpus callosum. Structure size should thus be considered when quantifying DKI parameters, either to control for its potentially confounding effect, or as a means of reducing unexplained variance.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23507377     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  28 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of diffusional kurtosis anisotropy.

Authors:  G Russell Glenn; Joseph A Helpern; Ali Tabesh; Jens H Jensen
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.044

2.  Preserved white matter microstructure in young patients with anorexia nervosa?

Authors:  Gerit Pfuhl; Joseph A King; Daniel Geisler; Benjamin Roschinski; Franziska Ritschel; Maria Seidel; Fabio Bernardoni; Dirk K Müller; Tonya White; Veit Roessner; Stefan Ehrlich
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Q-space trajectory imaging for multidimensional diffusion MRI of the human brain.

Authors:  Carl-Fredrik Westin; Hans Knutsson; Ofer Pasternak; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Evren Özarslan; Danielle van Westen; Cecilia Mattisson; Mats Bogren; Lauren J O'Donnell; Marek Kubicki; Daniel Topgaard; Markus Nilsson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Characteristics of Diffusional Kurtosis in Chronic Ischemia of Adult Moyamoya Disease: Comparing Diffusional Kurtosis and Diffusion Tensor Imaging.

Authors:  K Kazumata; K K Tha; H Narita; Y M Ito; H Shichinohe; M Ito; H Uchino; T Abumiya
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Indirect frontocingulate structural connectivity predicts clinical response to accelerated rTMS in major depressive disorder

Authors:  Deborah C.W. Klooster; Iris N. Vos; Karen Caeyenberghs; Alexander Leemans; Szabolcs David; René M.H. Besseling; Albert P. Aldenkamp; Chris Baeken
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.186

6.  Separating blood and water: Perfusion and free water elimination from diffusion MRI in the human brain.

Authors:  Anna S Rydhög; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Ronnie Wirestam; André Ahlgren; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Linda Knutsson; Ofer Pasternak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  The link between diffusion MRI and tumor heterogeneity: Mapping cell eccentricity and density by diffusional variance decomposition (DIVIDE).

Authors:  Filip Szczepankiewicz; Danielle van Westen; Elisabet Englund; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Freddy Ståhlberg; Jimmy Lätt; Pia C Sundgren; Markus Nilsson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Quantification of microscopic diffusion anisotropy disentangles effects of orientation dispersion from microstructure: applications in healthy volunteers and in brain tumors.

Authors:  Filip Szczepankiewicz; Samo Lasič; Danielle van Westen; Pia C Sundgren; Elisabet Englund; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Freddy Ståhlberg; Jimmy Lätt; Daniel Topgaard; Markus Nilsson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Multimodal MRI reveals structural connectivity differences in 22q11 deletion syndrome related to impaired spatial working memory.

Authors:  Erik O'Hanlon; Sarah Howley; Sarah Prasad; Jane McGrath; Alexander Leemans; Colm McDonald; Hugh Garavan; Kieran C Murphy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Biomarkers for Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Koji Kamagata; Christina Andica; Ayumi Kato; Yuya Saito; Wataru Uchida; Taku Hatano; Matthew Lukies; Takashi Ogawa; Haruka Takeshige-Amano; Toshiaki Akashi; Akifumi Hagiwara; Shohei Fujita; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.