Literature DB >> 32265013

Variation in long-term oncologic outcomes by type of cancer center accreditation: An analysis of a SEER-Medicare population with pancreatic cancer.

Zhi Ven Fong1, David C Chang1, Chin Hur2, Ginger Jin1, Angela Tramontano2, Naomi M Sell1, Andrew L Warshaw1, Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo1, Cristina R Ferrone1, Keith D Lillemoe1, Motaz Qadan3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer center accreditation is designed to identify centers that provide high-quality cancer care. This also guides patients and referring physicians towards centers of excellence for specialized care. We sought to examine if cancer center accreditation was associated with improved long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: Using the SEER-Medicare database, we identified patients who underwent pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 1996 to 2013. Hospitals were categorized into three groups: National Cancer Institute-designated (NCI-designated) centers, Commission on Cancer (CoC)-accredited centers, and "non-accredited" (NA) centers. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to calculate adjusted examined lymph nodes, disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS).
RESULTS: We identified 5,118 patients who underwent pancreatectomy at 632 hospitals (41.0% NA, 49.6% CoC, 9.4% NCI). NCI-designated centers had a greater median number of lymph nodes examined compared with CoC-accredited or NA centers (14 vs. 10 vs. 11.0 nodes, respectively; p < 0.001). Patients treated at NCI centers had a higher 5-year DSS compared to those treated at CoC or NA centers (31.2% vs. 23.6% vs. 23.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). Finally, patients treated at NCI centers had a higher 5-year OS compared to those treated at CoC or NA centers (23.5% vs. 18.9% vs. 17.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). The associations held true when adjusted analyses were performed.
CONCLUSION: Patients with resected pancreatic cancer treated at NCI-designated centers were associated with improved long-term oncologic outcomes. There was no difference between CoC-accredited centers compared with NA centers. Meticulous validation of accreditation is warranted globally prior to implementation.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer center accreditation; Oncologic outcomes; Pancreatic cancer; Survival; Variation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32265013     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.03.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

1.  Utility of HNF-1B and a panel of lineage-specific biomarkers to optimize the diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shi Bai; James Lindberg; Giles Whalen; Venu Bathini; Jian Zou; Michelle X Yang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Between-hospital variations in 3-year survival among patients with newly diagnosed gastric, colorectal, and lung cancer.

Authors:  Toshitaka Morishima; Sumiyo Okawa; Shihoko Koyama; Kayo Nakata; Takahiro Tabuchi; Isao Miyashiro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Is there value in cancer center accreditation?

Authors:  Cary Jo Schlick; Anthony D Yang
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Patient and Caregiver Considerations and Priorities When Selecting Hospitals for Complex Cancer Care.

Authors:  Zhi Ven Fong; Pei-Wen Lim; Ryan Hendrix; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Ryan D Nipp; James M Lindberg; Giles F Whalen; William Kastrinakis; Motaz Qadan; Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; David C Chang; Lara N Traeger
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.339

5.  Changes in Racial Disparities in Mortality After Cancer Surgery in the US, 2007-2016.

Authors:  Miranda B Lam; Katherine Raphael; Winta T Mehtsun; Jessica Phelan; E John Orav; Ashish K Jha; Jose F Figueroa
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-12-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.