Literature DB >> 32265012

Surgical telemedicine here to stay: More support from a randomized controlled trial on postoperative surgery visits.

Rachel C Forbes1, Carmen C Solorzano2, Beatrice P Concepcion3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32265012      PMCID: PMC7194890          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


× No keyword cloud information.
Telemedicine, the use of electronic information and communication technologies to provide health care when the participants are physically separated, has grown exponentially since its introduction in the 1950s. Today telemedicine has an estimated global market share of $38.3 billion dollars and a United States (US) market share of $12.5 billion with projected growth to $43.4 billion by 2025. There has been significant interest by the surgical community in utilizing telemedicine for perioperative care with multiple studies in various surgical specialties demonstrating excellent clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction with cost-savings to patients and health care systems.2, 3, 4 In this edition of the American Journal of Surgery, Cremades et al. report their findings from a trial including 200 patients randomized to outpatient clinic or telemedicine follow-up via video call for general surgery postoperative visits conducted in a tertiary care university hospital in Catalonia, Spain. The primary outcome was feasibility of follow-up which was defined as being able to complete the follow-up in the modality to which they were assigned. They were successfully able to complete 90% of the follow-up in the office visit group while only able to complete 74% in the telemedicine group; cited reasons for these issues included technical difficulties and requests to switch to the standard follow-up visit group. Feasibility is an important consideration for implementing telehealth visits. There are many studies which have highlighted the ability to use technology including videoconferencing telehealth (VCT) and smartphones successfully.2, 3, 4 The penetrance of technology continues to increase and a recent analysis of the US showed that over 80% of Americans used a smartphone. At our institution, the electronic medical record (EMR) has the capabilities for patients to download a hospital-EMR app to have VCT outpatient visits with providers. Improving portability and ease for patients will likely contribute to increasing feasibility for telemedicine visits. The secondary endpoints highlighted by Cremades et al. included clinical results and patient satisfaction. They found no difference in clinical results with a similar number requiring extra visits after the initial visit. Clinical results have consistently been similar for telemedicine versus traditional follow-up visits in numerous previous studies.2, 3, 4 Notably postoperative complication rates for general surgical procedures are quite low (0–4.8%) and some centers have even shown safe postoperative follow-up via telephone calls. Patient satisfaction in this study by Cremades et al. was also assessed systematically and found to be extremely high for both groups, which is also consistent with previous reports.2, 3, 4, 5 Patients using telemedicine do not need to travel to medical centers, take time off work, or spend time waiting for providers when using these modalities which likely contributes to the high satisfaction. Although this study did not have a cost-analysis, other studies have shown telemedicine allows for significant cost-savings to patients and healthcare systems. , In a 2017 Telehealth review article several factors were enumerated that need optimization prior to widespread adoption; these factors included: physician leadership, reimbursement, licensure, liability, human factors, device interoperability and data integration, privacy and security, performance measurement, and patient engagement and the evolving patient-physician relationship. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic many of these barriers are rapidly eroding in the US. Institutional and societal leadership, as well as healthcare providers and patients, are calling for increased utilization of telemedicine to evaluate and treat patients due to the acute need for social distancing and quarantining. Reimbursement is achieving parity to in-person visits due to the recent pandemic with specialized considerations for licensure due to a rapid response from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Mobile and internet-based devices with EMR-supported services are widely available and increasingly prevalent. Surgeons will need to adopt telemedicine with the understanding that high-quality studies including Cremedes et al. have investigated the feasibility, clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and even cost-effectiveness which have all been overwhelmingly positive.2, 3, 4, 5 , In addition to direct patient care, telesurgery has also been shown to be effective for remote education, consultation, and mentoring. Although the shift to telemedicine has been accelerated due to COVID-19, surgical telemedicine appears be an avenue for healthcare delivery that is here to stay.
  6 in total

1.  Telemedicine and telementoring in the surgical specialties: A narrative review.

Authors:  Eunice Y Huang; Samantha Knight; Camila Roginski Guetter; Catherine Hambleton Davis; Mecker Moller; Eliza Slama; Marie Crandall
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Telehealth.

Authors:  Reed V Tuckson; Margo Edmunds; Michael L Hodgkins
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Current Use of Telemedicine for Post-Discharge Surgical Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rebecca L Gunter; Skyler Chouinard; Sara Fernandes-Taylor; Jason T Wiseman; Sam Clarkson; Kyla Bennett; Caprice C Greenberg; K Craig Kent
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Telemedicine to follow patients in a general surgery department. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Manel Cremades; Georgina Ferret; David Parés; Jordi Navinés; Franc Espin; Fernando Pardo; Albert Caballero; Marta Viciano; Joan Francesc Julian
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  A Cost Comparison for Telehealth Utilization in the Kidney Transplant Waitlist Evaluation Process.

Authors:  Rachel C Forbes; Diane B Rybacki; Tommy B Johnson; Angela Hannah-Gillis; David Shaffer; Douglas A Hale
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 6.  The role of telemedicine in postoperative care.

Authors:  Aaron M Williams; Umar F Bhatti; Hasan B Alam; Vahagn C Nikolian
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2018-05-02
  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  Provider confidence in the telemedicine spine evaluation: results from a global study.

Authors:  Francis Lovecchio; Grant J Riew; Dino Samartzis; Philip K Louie; Niccole Germscheid; Howard S An; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Norman Chutkan; Gary Michael Mallow; Marko H Neva; Frank M Phillips; Daniel M Sciubba; Mohammad El-Sharkawi; Marcelo Valacco; Michael H McCarthy; Melvin C Makhni; Sravisht Iyer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Impact of COVID-19 Restrictions on Demographics and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Medically Necessary Non-Emergent Surgeries During the Pandemic.

Authors:  Adrienne B Shannon; Jeffrey L Roberson; Luke Keele; Tina Bharani; Yun Song; John T Miura; Rachel R Kelz; Daniel T Dempsey; Lee A Fleisher; Ronald P DeMatteo; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  What is the patient experience of surgical care during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic? A mixed-methods study at a single institution.

Authors:  Adrienne B Shannon; Jeffrey L Roberson; Justin T Clapp; Casey Vaughan; Melanie Kleid; Yun Song; John T Miura; Daniel T Dempsey; Ronald P DeMatteo; Lee A Fleisher; Giorgos C Karakousis
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  Impact of the internet on veterinary surgery.

Authors:  G V Souza; A C V Hespanha; B F Paz; M A R Sá; R K Carneiro; S A M Guaita; T V Magalhães; B W Minto; L G G G Dias
Journal:  Vet Anim Sci       Date:  2020-12-14

5.  Preparing for Telemedicine Visits: Guidelines and Setup.

Authors:  Aman Prasad; Ryan Brewster; Divya Rajasekaran; Karthik Rajasekaran
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-11-25

6.  Real-World Experience of mHealth Implementation in Clinical Practice (the Box): Design and Usability Study.

Authors:  Tom Biersteker; Alexander Hilt; Enno van der Velde; Martin Jan Schalij; Roderick Willem Treskes
Journal:  JMIR Cardio       Date:  2021-12-16

7.  The Spine Physical Examination Using Telemedicine: Strategies and Best Practices.

Authors:  Sravisht Iyer; Karim Shafi; Francis Lovecchio; Robert Turner; Todd J Albert; Han Jo Kim; Joel Press; Yoshihiro Katsuura; Harvinder Sandhu; Frank Schwab; Sheeraz Qureshi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-08-05

8.  Telemedicine for head and neck ambulatory visits during COVID-19: Evaluating usability and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Eleanor Layfield; Vasiliki Triantafillou; Aman Prasad; Jie Deng; Rabie M Shanti; Jason G Newman; Karthik Rajasekaran
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  The New Normal? Patient Satisfaction and Usability of Telemedicine in Breast Cancer Care.

Authors:  Bryan A Johnson; Bruce R Lindgren; Anne H Blaes; Helen M Parsons; Christopher J LaRocca; Ronda Farah; Jane Yuet Ching Hui
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Telephone consultation service in orthopedics during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  S M Miguela Álvarez; A Bartra Ylla; J Salvador Carreño; P Castillón; C García Cardona; F Anglès Crespo
Journal:  Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2021-04-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.