Literature DB >> 32264974

Practice of novel method of bedside postpyloric tube placement in patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

Shou-Tao Yuan1,2, Wen-Hao Zhang1,2, Lei Zou1,2, Jia-Kui Sun3,4, Ying Liu1,2, Qian-Kun Shi1,2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32264974      PMCID: PMC7137403          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-02863-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
During our clinical work against the epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan [1], we observed a high incidence of malnutrition in critically ill patients (data unpublished). Therefore, nutritional therapy was very important. In patients with dysphagia and a very high aspiration risk, postpyloric enteral nutrition (EN) was required [2]. However, how to place the postpyloric tube was a challenge in COVID-19 patients. Patients with masks removed (to expose the nasal cavity) were seriously infectious to doctors. Besides, it was difficult to perform the tube placement bedside for doctors with heavy medical protective clothes, goggles, and face shield. Here, we shared our practice of novel placing method in Wuhan. A 130-cm-long non-spiral transpyloric tube with a guide wire (CH10-130, inner diameter 2.0–2.1 mm, Flocare, Nutricia Ltd., Wuxi, China) (Fig. 1a) was used in our isolation unit. The procedure of placement was similar to the method reported by our previous study [3, 4]. Patients were placed in right decubitus position about 30–45° with bed head raised at about 30°. After esophageal placement and gastric placement, the postpyloric placement was performed by advancing the tube at 5–10 cm intervals gradually and checking its tip position each time. Subsequently, the tip position would be confirmed by abdominal plain radiographs or gastrointestinal ultrasound bedside. The tube that we used has several advantages compared with spiral tube. First, the price of Flocare tube (approximately $22) is 1/3 less compared with spiral tube (approximately $71) in China. Second, the Flocare tube has two side holes near its tip (Fig. 1b); it is less likely to be blocked. Third, the guide wire is shorter in length compared with the tube; therefore, the rigid tip could not damage the digestive tract during our placing procedure
Fig. 1

The 130-cm-long transpyloric tube with a guide wire (CH10-130, inner diameter 2.0–2.1 mm, Flocare, Nutricia Ltd., Wuxi, China) used in our unit (a). This Flocare tube has two side holes near its tip (b). Abdominal plain radiograph showed the tip of Flocare tube was positioned near the Treitz ligament (c)

The 130-cm-long transpyloric tube with a guide wire (CH10-130, inner diameter 2.0–2.1 mm, Flocare, Nutricia Ltd., Wuxi, China) used in our unit (a). This Flocare tube has two side holes near its tip (b). Abdominal plain radiograph showed the tip of Flocare tube was positioned near the Treitz ligament (c) There have been three patients who received our novel method of postpyloric tube placement. The 3 cases were all successful at the first attempt (Fig. 1c). The median time of procedure was 19 (14–25) minutes, and the median insertion length was 105 (95–110) cm. No operation- and tube-related complications were found. Considering the less expensive tube and high success rate, our novel blind bedside postpyloric placement may be easier to perform in patients with COVID-19 worldwide.
  3 in total

1.  ESPEN guideline on clinical nutrition in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Pierre Singer; Annika Reintam Blaser; Mette M Berger; Waleed Alhazzani; Philip C Calder; Michael P Casaer; Michael Hiesmayr; Konstantin Mayer; Juan Carlos Montejo; Claude Pichard; Jean-Charles Preiser; Arthur R H van Zanten; Simon Oczkowski; Wojciech Szczeklik; Stephan C Bischoff
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 7.324

2.  A novel method of blind bedside placement of postpyloric tubes.

Authors:  Jia-Kui Sun; Xiang Wang; Shou-Tao Yuan
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.

Authors:  Na Zhu; Dingyu Zhang; Wenling Wang; Xingwang Li; Bo Yang; Jingdong Song; Xiang Zhao; Baoying Huang; Weifeng Shi; Roujian Lu; Peihua Niu; Faxian Zhan; Xuejun Ma; Dayan Wang; Wenbo Xu; Guizhen Wu; George F Gao; Wenjie Tan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 91.245

  3 in total
  3 in total

1.  Bedside rapid placement of nasointestinal feeding tube via ultrasound-guided stylet positioning in critical COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Chuan-Xi Chen; Zheng-Deng Wei; Yong-Jun Liu; Shou-Zhen Cheng; Xiang-Dong Guan
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Fluoroscopic placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes in COVID-19 patients in the prone position.

Authors:  Hordur Mar Kolbeinsson; James Veldkamp; James D Paauw
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  A solution scan of societal options to reduce transmission and spread of respiratory viruses: SARS-CoV-2 as a case study.

Authors:  William J Sutherland; Nigel G Taylor; David C Aldridge; Philip Martin; Catherine Rhodes; Gorm Shackelford; Simon Beard; Haydn Belfield; Andrew J Bladon; Cameron Brick; Alec P Christie; Andrew P Dobson; Harriet Downey; Amelia S C Hood; Fangyuan Hua; Alice C Hughes; Rebecca M Jarvis; Douglas MacFarlane; William H Morgan; Anne-Christine Mupepele; Stefan J Marciniak; Cassidy Nelson; Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh; Clarissa Rios Rojas; Katherine A Sainsbury; Rebecca K Smith; Lalitha S Sundaram; Ann Thornton; John Watkins; Thomas B White; Kate Willott; Silviu O Petrovan
Journal:  J Biosaf Biosecur       Date:  2021-09-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.