Literature DB >> 29519252

A novel method of blind bedside placement of postpyloric tubes.

Jia-Kui Sun1, Xiang Wang2, Shou-Tao Yuan3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29519252      PMCID: PMC5844087          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-018-1986-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.

We read with great interest the recent report on blind bedside postpyloric placement by Lv et al. [1]. Their methods were proven to be safe and effective in intensive care units. Although our placing procedure is similar to that reported by the authors, the choice of a postpyloric tube and the patient’s position requires further improvement. In our center, we use a 130-cm long transpyloric tube with a guide wire (CH10–130, inner diameter 2.0–2.1 mm, Flocare, Nutricia Ltd, Wuxi, China; Fig. 1a) rather than the spiral feeding tube used by Lv et al. The Flocare tube that we used has several advantages compared with the spiral tube. First, the Flocare tube is inexpensive, approximately $22, in China, whereas the spiral tube costs approximately $71. Expense is extremely important in developing countries and at one-third less compared with the latter, our technique is easier to implement in hospitals and areas with limited resources. Second, the Flocare tube that we used has two side holes near its tip (Fig. 1b); therefore, it is less likely to be blocked compared with the spiral tube. Third, the guide wire is shorter in length compared with the Flocare tube; thus, the rigid tip would not damage the digestive tract during the placing procedure.
Fig. 1

The 130-cm long transpyloric tube with a guidewire (CH10–130, inner diameter 2.0–2.1 mm, Flocare, Nutricia Ltd, Wuxi, China) used in our center (a). This Flocare tube has two side holes near its tip (b)

The 130-cm long transpyloric tube with a guidewire (CH10–130, inner diameter 2.0–2.1 mm, Flocare, Nutricia Ltd, Wuxi, China) used in our center (a). This Flocare tube has two side holes near its tip (b) The patient’s position before placing the postpyloric tube also requires further improvement. In our procedure, the patient is placed in a right decubitus position at 30–45° after gastric placement is accomplished, followed by a postpyloric placement. According to our experience, in this position the tip of the Flocare tube falls to the pylorus ostium by gravity, which may increase the placement success rate. The results of our data (unpublished) analysis confirmed our improved methods (Fig. 2). From December 2016 to December 2017, 44 patients underwent postpyloric tube placement using our novel techniques. In total, 38 cases (86.4%) were successful, and 33 cases (75.0%) were successful at the first attempt. The success rate and first-time success rate of our placement techniques were better than those described in the study by Lv et al. The median time of our procedure was 13 (8.5–16) minutes, and the median insertion length was 100 (93.5–110) cm. These values are similar to the results of Lv et al. and other previous reports [1-3].
Fig. 2

Abdominal plain radiographs showing the tip of the Flocare tube positioned at the horizontal part (a) and descending part (b) of the duodenum. The former demonstrates the classic C-shaped duodenal configuration diagnostic of postpyloric placement

Abdominal plain radiographs showing the tip of the Flocare tube positioned at the horizontal part (a) and descending part (b) of the duodenum. The former demonstrates the classic C-shaped duodenal configuration diagnostic of postpyloric placement Considering the less expensive tube and better first-time success rate, our novel blind bedside postpyloric placement may be easier to implement worldwide, and we look forward to collaborating with the authors and other colleagues.
  3 in total

1.  A novel method of post-pyloric feeding tube placement at bedside.

Authors:  Hisakazu Kohata; Nao Okuda; Emiko Nakataki; Taiga Itagaki; Mutsuo Onodera; Hideaki Imanaka; Masaji Nishimura
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 3.425

2.  Blind bedside placement of postpyloric feeding tubes by registered dietitians: success rates, outcomes, and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  Christina M Rollins
Journal:  Nutr Clin Pract       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.080

3.  Blind bedside postpyloric placement of spiral tube as rescue therapy in critically ill patients: a prospective, tricentric, observational study.

Authors:  Bo Lv; Linhui Hu; Lifang Chen; Bei Hu; Yanlin Zhang; Heng Ye; Cheng Sun; Xiunong Zhang; Huilan Lan; Chunbo Chen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 9.097

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Fluoroscopic placement of nasojejunal feeding tubes in COVID-19 patients in the prone position.

Authors:  Hordur Mar Kolbeinsson; James Veldkamp; James D Paauw
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  The choice of a postpyloric tube and the patient's position in our procedure: A response.

Authors:  Bei Hu; Bo Lv; Chunbo Chen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 9.097

3.  Practice of novel method of bedside postpyloric tube placement in patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

Authors:  Shou-Tao Yuan; Wen-Hao Zhang; Lei Zou; Jia-Kui Sun; Ying Liu; Qian-Kun Shi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Efficacy and safety of a modified method for blind bedside placement of post-pyloric feeding tube: a prospective preliminary clinical trial.

Authors:  Xiong Bing; Tang Yinshan; Jin Ying; Shen Yingchuan
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.671

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.