| Literature DB >> 32264874 |
Shadia Khan Sunny1, Hongmei Zhang2, Faisal I Rezwan3, Caroline L Relton4, A John Henderson5, Simon Kebede Merid6, Erik Melén6,7, Jenny Hallberg6,7, S Hasan Arshad8,9, Susan Ewart10, John W Holloway11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescence is a significant period for the gender-dependent development of lung function. Prior studies have shown that DNA methylation (DNA-M) is associated with lung function and DNA-M at some cytosine-phosphate-guanine dinucleotide sites (CpGs) changes over time. This study examined whether changes of DNA-M at lung-function-related CpGs are associated with changes in lung function during adolescence for each gender, and if so, the biological significance of the detected CpGs.Entities:
Keywords: ALSPAC; Adolescence; BAMSE; DNA methylation; Genome-wide; IOW cohort; Lung function
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32264874 PMCID: PMC7140357 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-020-01342-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Characteristics of subjects with available methylation data with their lung function of the IOW cohort
| IOW cohort | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sub cohort at age 10: | Study sample at age 10: | Sub cohort at age 18: | Study sample at age 18: | |||
| 2.03 | 2.04 | 0.456 | 4.01 ± 0.78 | 4.05 ± 0.76 | 0.226 | |
| 2.30 | 2.30 | 0.694 | 4.61 ± 0.93 | 4.66 ± 0.91 | 0.283 | |
| 0.89 | 0.89 | 0.162 | 0.87 ± 0.07 | 0.87 ± 0.07 | 0.269 | |
| 138.92 | 138.06 | 0.685 | 170.88 ± 9.17 | 170.92 ± 9.08 | 0.925 | |
| 18.16 | 18.08 | 0.649 | 23.21 ± 4.33 | 23.30 ± 4.26 | 0.639 | |
| 488 (49.8) | 183 (57.19) | 395 (47.14) | 212 (46.80) | 0.932 | ||
| 492 (50.2) | 137 (42.81) | 443 (52.86) | 241 (53.20) | |||
| – | – | – | 462 (55.13) | 248 (54.75) | 0.913 | |
| – | – | 204 (24.34) | 107 (23.62) | |||
| – | – | 159 (18.97) | 93 (20.53) | |||
| – | – | 13 (1.55) | 5 (1.10) | |||
Active smoking at age 10 years in the IOW Cohort was not identified
Characteristics of subjects with methylation data and lung function of IOW cohort, stratified by gender
| IOW cohort | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sub cohort at age 10: | Study sample at age 10: | Sub cohort at age 18: | Study sample at age 18: | |||
| 2.05 | 2.06 | 0.477 | 4.62 ± 0.62 | 4.64 ± 0.62 | 0.621 | |
| 2.35 | 2.36 | 0.813 | 5.35 ± 0.72 | 5.35 ± 0.73 | 0.930 | |
| 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.651 | 0.87 ± 0.07 | 0.87 ± 0.07 | 0.904 | |
| 139.00 | 138.94 | 0.893 | 177.83 ± 6.65 | 177.56 ± 6.87 | 0.568 | |
| 17.57 | 17.65 | 0.665 | 22.51 ± 3.72 | 22.64 ± 3.72 | 0.609 | |
| – | – | – | 222 (56.20) | 119 (56.13) | 0.813 | |
| – | – | 93 (23.54) | 46 (21.70) | |||
| – | – | 72 (18.23) | 44 (20.75) | |||
| – | – | 8 (2.03) | 3 (1.42) | |||
| 2.00 | 2.01 | 0.832 | 3.51 ± 0.45 | 3.53 ± 0.43 | 0.340 | |
| 2.23 | 2.24 | 0.657 | 4.03 ± 0.53 | 4.04 ± 0.51 | 0.737 | |
| 0.90 | 0.90 | 0.337 | 0.88 ± 0.07 | 0.87 ± 0.07 | 0.563 | |
| 139.02 | 139.22 | 0.719 | 164.68 ± 6.17 | 165.08 ± 6.37 | 0.331 | |
| 18.74 | 18.66 | 0.789 | 23.84 ± 4.72 | 23.89 ± 4.61 | 0.870 | |
| – | – | – | 240 (54.18) | 129 (53.53) | 0.979 | |
| – | – | 111 (25.06) | 61 (25.31) | |||
| – | – | 87 (19.64) | 49 (20.33) | |||
| – | – | 5 (1.13) | 2 (0.83) | |||
Active smoking at age 10 years in the IOW Cohort was not identified
Fig. 1Flow chart of statistical analyses and the number of CpGs after each analysis. Note: 1) *Number of significant CpGs were mentioned in an order for FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/ FVC changes respectively. 2) **At age 10 years, for males, between FVC and FEV1, and between FEV1 and FEV1/ FVC, 8 and 3 CpGs are overlapped, respectively; for females, between FVC and FEV1, 21 CpGs are overlapped in the screening. 3) At age 18 years, for males, between FVC and FEV1, and between FEV1 and FEV1 / FVC, 8 and 1 CpGs are overlapped, respectively; for females, between FVC and FEV1, between FEV1 and FEV1/ FVC, and between FVC and FEV1/ FVC, 9, 1, and 2 CpGs are overlapped, respectively, in the screening
CpGs showing consistent associations in females between the IOW and replication cohorts, ALSPAC and BAMSE
| CpG Name | Chr. | Gene name | Location | IOW cohort | ALSPAC-cohort | BAMSE cohort | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coeff. | Coeff. | Coeff. | ||||||||
| cg08095278 | 1 | TSS1500 | −0.008 | 0.0031 | 0.0218 | – | – | −0.031 | 0.339 | |
| cg13342625 | 1 | TSS200 | −0.009 | 0.0016 | 0.0187 | – | – | −0.021 | 0.663 | |
| cg02288301 | 2 | TSS1500 | −0.011 | 0.0021 | 0.0201 | – | – | −0.020 | 0.549 | |
| cg00930455 | 7 | TSS1500 | −0.010 | 0.0055 | 0.0299 | – | −0.0003 | 0.990 | ||
| cg14552568 | 7 | Intergenic | −0.011 | 0.0012 | 0.0187 | – | – | −0.091 | ||
| cg09573852 | 8 | Body | −0.006 | 0.0054 | 0.0299 | −0.005 | 0.399 | – | – | |
| cg23188819 | 8 | Body | −0.007 | 0.0030 | 0.0218 | −0.009 | 0.422 | – | – | |
| cg09033333 | 10 | Intergenic | −0.007 | 0.0035 | 0.0223 | −0.0002 | 0.977 | – | – | |
| cg07427606 | 12 | Body | −0.007 | 0.0031 | 0.0218 | – | – | −0.022 | 0.412 | |
| cg05312779 | 15 | 3’UTR | −0.010 | 0.0062 | 0.0315 | – | – | −0.037 | 0.220 | |
| cg04575609* | 16 | Body | −0.007 | 0.0021 | 0.0201 | −0.001 | 0.884 | – | – | |
| cg04933438 | 16 | Body | −0.012 | 0.0002 | 0.0092 | – | – | −0.006 | 0.849 | |
| cg11316510 | 17 | Body | −0.006 | 0.0100 | 0.0403 | −0.012 | 0.290 | – | – | |
| cg00850039 | 19 | TSS200 | −0.007 | 0.0056 | 0.0299 | – | – | −0.013 | 0.710 | |
| cg10027934 | 22 | Body | −0.014 | 0.0012 | 0.0187 | – | – | −0.051 | 0.081 | |
| cg27652464 | 22 | Body | −0.008 | 0.0022 | 0.0201 | – | – | −0.028 | 0.219 | |
Note: 1) Regression coefficients were for the associations of changes in DNA-M with FEV1/FVC changes in females
2) CpGs with the genes’ names in bold font were overlapped across all the three cohorts (IOW-ALSPAC-BAMSE consistent CpGs)
3) In BAMSE cohort, DNA-M of *cg04575609 was excluded at the time of quality control and was not available for the replication analysis
4) Chr. chromosome number, Coeff. coefficients
Fig. 2Barplots of coefficients of IOW-ALSPAC and IOW-BAMSE consistent CpGs with their mapped genes in females. Note: The coefficients were shown for the association of DNA-M changes with changes in lung function (FEV1/FVC) in females adolescence. Mapped genes of the CpGs showing consistent associations between the IOW and ALSPAC cohorts (left panels) and between the IOW and BAMSE cohorts (right panels) were included. Gene names overlapped among the three cohorts were given in red font
Biological processes were identified from the mapped genes based on the IOW-ALSPAC consistent CpGs
| Name of the Biological process | Hit in Query List | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive regulation of RNA metabolic process | 3.39E-05 | 2.93E-02 | |
| Positive regulation of nucleobase-containing compound metabolic process | 9.30E-05 | 2.93E-02 | |
| Positive regulation of gene expression | 1.16E-04 | 2.93E-02 | |
| Interleukin-1-mediated signaling pathway | 1.33E-04 | 2.93E-02 | |
| Positive regulation of nitrogen compound metabolic process | 1.42E-04 | 2.93E-02 | |
| Positive regulation of nucleic acid-templated transcription | 2.30E-04 | 3.19E-02 | |
| Positive regulation of transcription, DNA-templated | 2.30E-04 | 3.19E-02 | |
| Positive regulation of RNA biosynthetic process | 2.47E-04 | 3.19E-02 |
Note: The same biological processes were involved in the BAMSE cohort based on the CpGs identified BAMSE, although they did not survive multiple testing after controlling for FDR of 0.05
Genes which were formatted in bold, involved in the biological processes in both ALSPAC and BMASE cohorts