| Literature DB >> 32257098 |
Bendix Labeit1,2, Inga Claus1, Paul Muhle1,2, Sonja Suntrup-Krueger1,2, Rainer Dziewas1, Tobias Warnecke1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pharyngeal dysphagia is a common symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) leading to severe complications. PD-related pharyngeal dysphagia (PDrPD) may significantly improve in up to half of patients following acute oral levodopa challenge.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32257098 PMCID: PMC7086436 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4260501
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parkinsons Dis ISSN: 2042-0080
Figure 1Illustration of the FEES examination protocol and the rating of the FEES videos.
Descriptive statistics for the total cohort as well as for the subgroup with follow-up FEES examinations before and after beginning with levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG).
|
| |
| Total cohort | 32 (71.1) |
| Subgroup | 8 (72.7) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Total cohort | 73.3 ± 8.2 |
| Subgroup | 74.6 ± 4.4 |
|
| |
|
| |
| Total cohort | 16.0 ± 6.5 |
| Subgroup | 15.2 ± 6.6 |
|
| |
|
| |
| Total cohort | 27.0 ± 22.3 |
| Subgroup | 28.4 ± 18.8 |
|
| |
|
| |
| Total cohort | 28 (62.2) |
| Subgroup | 11 (100.0) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Total cohort | 9 (20.0) |
| Subgroup | 2 (18.2) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Total cohort | 11 (24.4) |
| Subgroup | 2 (18.2) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Total cohort | 5 (11.1) |
| Subgroup | 1 (9.1) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Total cohort | 3 (6.7) |
| Subgroup | 1 (9.1) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Total cohort | 18 (40.0) |
| Subgroup | 4 (36.4) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Total cohort | 16 (35.6) |
| Subgroup | 3 (27.3) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Total cohort | 3 (6.7) |
| Subgroup | 1 (9.1) |
|
| |
|
| |
| Total cohort | 22 (48.9) |
| Subgroup | 7 (63.6) |
Descriptive statistics of the FEES-L-dopa-score and its subdomains, white-out duration, levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD), Hoehn and Yahr scale, and functional oral intake scale (FOIS), as well as the p value of the comparison before and after beginning of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) in the total cohort and the subgroup of patients with follow-up FEES before and after beginning with LCIG.
| Before LCIG | After LCIG |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Subgroup | 14.9 ± 7.3 | 13.0 ± 6.9 | 0.312 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Subgroup | 5.4 ± 1.1 | 3.6 ± 1.0 |
|
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Subgroup | 0.3 ± 0.9 | 0.5 ± 1.0 | 0.690 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Subgroup | 9.3 ± 5.9 | 8.9 ± 6.0 | 0.795 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Subgroup | 984 ± 228 | 699 ± 131 |
|
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Total cohort | 3.8 ± 0.7 | 3.5 ± 0.7 | 0.078 |
| Subgroup | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 3.8 ± 0.6 | 0.317 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Total cohort | 1182.9 ± 339.3 | 1684.2 ± 468.2 |
|
| Subgroup | 1246.1 ± 371.9 | 2062.0 ± 379.2 |
|
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Total cohort | 6.6 ± 1.1 | 6.6 ± 1.1 | 0.832 |
| Subgroup | 6.4 ± 0.9 | 6.6 ± 0.5 | 0.414 |