Literature DB >> 26050238

The Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale: An Anatomically Defined and Image-Based Tool.

Paul D Neubauer1, Alfred W Rademaker2, Steven B Leder3.   

Abstract

The Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale was developed, standardized, and validated to provide reliable, anatomically defined, and image-based assessment of post-swallow pharyngeal residue severity as observed during fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). It is a five-point ordinal rating scale based on residue location (vallecula and pyriform sinus) and amount (none, trace, mild, moderate, and severe). Two expert judges reviewed a total of 261 FEES evaluations and selected a no residue exemplar and three exemplars each of trace, mild, moderate, and severe vallecula and pyriform sinus residue. Hard-copy color images of the no residue, 12 vallecula, and 12 pyriform sinus exemplars were randomized by residue location for hierarchical categorization by 20 raters with a mean of 8.3 years of experience (range 2-27 years) performing and interpreting FEES. Severity ratings for all images were performed by the same 20 raters, 2 weeks apart, and with the order of image presentations randomized. Intra-rater test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, and construct validity were determined by pooled multi-category multi-rater kappa statistics. Residue ratings were excellent for intra-rater reliability for vallecula (kappa = 0.957 ± 0.014) and pyriform sinus (kappa = 0.854 ± 0.021); very good to excellent for inter-rater reliability for vallecula (kappa = 0.868 ± 0.011) and pyriform sinus (kappa = 0.751 ± 0.011); and excellent for validity for vallecula (kappa = 0.951 ± 0.014) and pyriform sinus (kappa = 0.908 ± 0.017). Clinical uses include accurate classification of vallecula and pyriform sinus residue severity patterns as none, trace, mild, moderate, or severe for diagnostic purposes, determination of functional therapeutic change, and precise dissemination of shared information. Scientific uses include tracking outcome measures, demonstrating efficacy of interventions to reduce pharyngeal residue, investigating morbidity and mortality in relation to pharyngeal residue severity, and improving training and accuracy of FEES interpretation by students and clinicians. The Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale is a reliable, validated, anatomically defined, and image-based tool to determine residue location and severity based on FEES.

Keywords:  Deglutition; Deglutition disorders; Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing; Pharyngeal residue; Pyriform sinus; Scaling; Vallecula

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26050238     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-015-9631-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  23 in total

1.  Effects of verbal cue on bolus flow during swallowing.

Authors:  Stephanie K Daniels; Mae Fern Schroeder; Pamela C DeGeorge; David M Corey; John C Rosenbek
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Pooling score: an endoscopic model for evaluating severity of dysphagia.

Authors:  D Farneti
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 3.  Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.

Authors:  Steven B Leder; Joseph T Murray
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.784

4.  The significance of accumulated oropharyngeal secretions and swallowing frequency in predicting aspiration.

Authors:  J Murray; S E Langmore; S Ginsberg; A Dostie
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Mechanisms involved in postdeglutition retention in the elderly.

Authors:  E Dejaeger; W Pelemans; E Ponette; E Joosten
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Evaluation of swallowing safety with fiberoptic endoscope: comparison with videofluoroscopic technique.

Authors:  C H Wu; T Y Hsiao; J C Chen; Y C Chang; S Y Lee
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and videofluoroscopy: does examination type influence perception of pharyngeal residue severity?

Authors:  A M Kelly; P Leslie; T Beale; C Payten; M J Drinnan
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.597

8.  A prospective, double-blind, randomized study on the use of a topical anesthetic, vasoconstrictor, and placebo during transnasal flexible fiberoptic endoscopy.

Authors:  S B Leder; D A Ross; K B Briskin; C T Sasaki
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare?

Authors:  Annette M Kelly; Michael J Drinnan; Paula Leslie
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 10.  Image-based measurement of post-swallow residue: the normalized residue ratio scale.

Authors:  William G Pearson; Sonja M Molfenter; Zachary M Smith; Catriona M Steele
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 3.438

View more
  50 in total

Review 1.  Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scales Based on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Paul D Neubauer; Denise P Hersey; Steven B Leder
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 2.  History of Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Evaluation and Management of Pharyngeal Dysphagia: Changes over the Years.

Authors:  Susan E Langmore
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Psychometric Properties of Visuoperceptual Measures of Videofluoroscopic and Fibre-Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Katina Swan; Reinie Cordier; Ted Brown; Renée Speyer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Validation of the German Version of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale.

Authors:  Marco Gerschke; Thomas Schöttker-Königer; Annette Förster; Jonka Friederike Netzebandt; Ulla Marie Beushausen
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 5.  Hypersalivation: update of the German S2k guideline (AWMF) in short form.

Authors:  Armin Steffen; Wolfgang Jost; Tobias Bäumer; Dirk Beutner; Sabine Degenkolb-Weyers; Martin Groß; Maria Grosheva; Samer Hakim; Kai G Kahl; Rainer Laskawi; Rebekka Lencer; Jan Löhler; Thekla Meyners; Saskia Rohrbach-Volland; Rainer Schönweiler; Sara-Christina Schröder; Sebastian Schröder; Heidrun Schröter-Morasch; Maria Schuster; Susanne Steinlechner; Roland Urban; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Assessment of Oral Function and Proper Diet Level for Frail Elderly Individuals in Nursing Homes Using Chewing Training Food.

Authors:  K Nakagawa; K Matsuo
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 4.075

7.  Reliability of Untrained and Experienced Raters on FEES: Rating Overall Residue is a Simple Task.

Authors:  Jessica M Pisegna; James C Borders; Asako Kaneoka; Wendy J Coster; Rebecca Leonard; Susan E Langmore
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Measuring Vallecular Volume on Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Proof of Concept Study.

Authors:  Kaylee Kim; Jessica M Pisegna; Samantha Kennedy; Susan Langmore
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 3.438

9.  European white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Laura W J Baijens; Margaret Walshe; Leena-Maija Aaltonen; Christoph Arens; Reinie Cordier; Patrick Cras; Lise Crevier-Buchman; Chris Curtis; Wojciech Golusinski; Roganie Govender; Jesper Grau Eriksen; Kevin Hansen; Kate Heathcote; Markus M Hess; Sefik Hosal; Jens Peter Klussmann; C René Leemans; Denise MacCarthy; Beatrice Manduchi; Jean-Paul Marie; Reza Nouraei; Claire Parkes; Christina Pflug; Walmari Pilz; Julie Regan; Nathalie Rommel; Antonio Schindler; Annemie M W J Schols; Renee Speyer; Giovanni Succo; Irene Wessel; Anna C H Willemsen; Taner Yilmaz; Pere Clavé
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Rethinking Residue: Determining the Perceptual Continuum of Residue on FEES to Enable Better Measurement.

Authors:  Jessica M Pisegna; Asako Kaneoka; Rebecca Leonard; Susan E Langmore
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.