Literature DB >> 32254036

Midterm outcomes after arthroscopic repair of partial rotator cuff tears: A retrospective study of correlation between partial tear types and surgical technique.

Ulunay Kanatlı1, Tacettin Ayanoğlu2, Muhammet Baybars Ataoğlu1, Mustafa Özer3, Mehmet Çetinkaya4, Toygun Kağan Eren5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for partial rotator cuff tears were evaluated retrospectively. This study purposed to assess the postoperative clinical results of arthroscopic treatment of intratendinous rotator cuff tears and to investigate the effect of the tear type on the postoperative clinical outcomes.
METHODS: Overall, 60 patients [36 women and 24 men; mean age: 48.6±12.2 years (range 33-67 years)] who underwent arthroscopic repair of Ellman stage 3 partial rotator cuff tear were evaluated retrospectively. These patients were grouped into the following three groups: articular-sided tears, bursal-sided tears, and intratendinous tears, with 20 patients included in each group. Subacromial decompression, acromioplasty, and tear repair without transforming to full-thickness tear were applied to the bursal-sided tears. The same technique was performed for intratendinous ruptures, with the only technical difference was that the capsular tissue was preserved during debridement of intratendinous tears. The articular-sided tears were transformed to complete tears and repaired arthroscopically. The preoperative and postoperative ASES scores and range of motion improvements were evaluated in all patients. The mean follow-up time was 44±6.5 months (range: 36-62 months).
RESULTS: No significant intergroup differences were observed concerning the age and the mean follow-up duration (p=0.524, p=0.665). A similar increase in ASES scores was observed for all three types of tears (bursal-sided tears: 31.09-82.65; articular-sided tears: 35.50--84.00; intratendinous tears: 34.01-83.49). Statistically, no significant intergroup difference was observed concerning ASES score improvement (p=0.585). An increase in mean forward flexion, abduction, and external rotation were observed, especially, a statistically significant increase in flexion (p=0.001) and abduction (p=0.001) in all three types of tears. No patient experienced any intraoperative or postoperative complications.
CONCLUSION: The results of arthroscopic treatment of intratendinous tears were similar to the other types of partial tears, and the results of arthroscopic treatment of grade 3 partial rotator cuff tears revealed satisfactory outcomes, regardless of the type of the tear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32254036      PMCID: PMC7286164          DOI: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.02.486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc        ISSN: 1017-995X            Impact factor:   1.511


  27 in total

Review 1.  The management of partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  H Fukuda
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-01

Review 2.  Arthroscopic management of partial, full-thickness, and complex rotator cuff tears: indications, techniques, and complications.

Authors:  Eric S Millstein; Stephen J Snyder
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Optimizing the management of rotator cuff problems.

Authors:  Robert A Pedowitz; Ken Yamaguchi; Christopher S Ahmad; Robert T Burks; Evan L Flatow; Andrew Green; Joseph P Iannotti; Bruce S Miller; Robert Z Tashjian; William C Watters; Kristy Weber; Charles M Turkelson; Janet L Wies; Sara Anderson; Justin St Andre; Kevin Boyer; Laura Raymond; Patrick Sluka; Richard McGowan
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Comparison of subacromial tenoxicam and steroid injections in the treatment of impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Hakan Çift; Feyza Ünlü Özkan; Sena Tolu; Ali Şeker; Mahir Mahiroğulları
Journal:  Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi       Date:  2015

5.  Use of magnetic resonance arthrography to compare clinical features and structural integrity after arthroscopic repair of bursal versus articular side partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Sung-Jae Kim; Sung-Hwan Kim; Su-Han Lim; Yong-Min Chun
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 6.  Multimedia article. The arthroscopic management of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Eric J Strauss; Michael J Salata; James Kercher; Joseph U Barker; Kevin McGill; Bernard R Bach; Anthony A Romeo; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Relationship between the lateral acromion angle and rotator cuff disease.

Authors:  M P Banas; R J Miller; S Totterman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Outcome of nonoperative treatment of symptomatic rotator cuff tears monitored by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Eran Maman; Craig Harris; Lawrence White; George Tomlinson; Misra Shashank; Erin Boynton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Grade of coracoacromial ligament degeneration as a predictive factor for impingement syndrome and type of partial rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  Ulunay Kanatli; Tacettin Ayanoğlu; Erdem Aktaş; M Baybars Ataoğlu; Mustafa Özer; Mehmet Çetinkaya
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results of Arthroscopic Repair of Intratendinous Partial-thickness Rotator Cuff Tears.

Authors:  Jian Xiao; Guo-Qing Cui
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

View more
  1 in total

1.  Does Preoperative Conservative Management Affect the Success of Arthroscopic Repair of Partial Rotator Cuff Tear?

Authors:  Tacettin Ayanoglu; Mustafa Ozer; Mehmet Cetinkaya; Ahmet Yigit Kaptan; Coskun Ulucakoy; Baybars Ataoglu; Ulunay Kanatlı
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 1.033

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.