Literature DB >> 35140860

Does Preoperative Conservative Management Affect the Success of Arthroscopic Repair of Partial Rotator Cuff Tear?

Tacettin Ayanoglu1, Mustafa Ozer2, Mehmet Cetinkaya3, Ahmet Yigit Kaptan4, Coskun Ulucakoy4, Baybars Ataoglu4, Ulunay Kanatlı4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to examine the effect of preoperative conservative treatment on the success of high-grade bursal/articular-sided partial rotator cuff repair.
METHODS: Patients who had undergone shoulder arthroscopy in institution for Ellman Stage 3 bursal-side or articular-side partial tears between January 2008 and April 2018 were investigated retrospectively. This study assessed 201 patients diagnosed with isolated partial rotator cuff tears with a history of failed conservative management and persistent shoulder pain who underwent arthroscopic surgery. The demographic data of patients and pre- and postoperative The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Scores (ASES) that were recorded in the archive were evaluated.
RESULTS: While 55 of the patients with Ellman grade 3 bursal-sided partial tears received preoperative conservative management for at least 6 months (Group 1), 62 of them could not tolerate conservative management and early arthroscopic repair was performed (Group 2). On the other hand, 42 of the patients with Ellman grade 3 articular-sided tears received preoperative conservative management (Group 3), 42 of them could not tolerate preoperative conservative management (Group 4). The mean ASES score improvement was 52.33 ± 8.55 for Group 1, 54.68 ± 11.29 for Group 2, 48.4 ± 7.77 for Group 3 and 49.33 ± 10.05 for Group 4. A statistically significant difference was found between the groups with one-way ANOVA test (p = 0.05). With the Tukey test, this difference was seen to be caused by Group 2.
CONCLUSION: Although there are many factors affecting its success, conservative management should be the first option in the treatment of partial rotator cuff tears. However, we think that it should not be insisted especially in patients with bursal-sided tears (> 50% of the tendon thickness) that cannot tolerate conservative management due to severe pain since the results of early arthroscopic repair of bursal-sided tears were found to be better. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study, Level III. © Indian Orthopaedics Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopic repair; Arthroscopy; Articular-sided partial rotator cuff tears; Bursal-sided partial rotator cuff tears; Conservative treatment; Shoulder

Year:  2021        PMID: 35140860      PMCID: PMC8790001          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-021-00479-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.033


  19 in total

Review 1.  The management of partial-thickness tears of the rotator cuff.

Authors:  H Fukuda
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-01

2.  Optimizing the management of rotator cuff problems.

Authors:  Robert A Pedowitz; Ken Yamaguchi; Christopher S Ahmad; Robert T Burks; Evan L Flatow; Andrew Green; Joseph P Iannotti; Bruce S Miller; Robert Z Tashjian; William C Watters; Kristy Weber; Charles M Turkelson; Janet L Wies; Sara Anderson; Justin St Andre; Kevin Boyer; Laura Raymond; Patrick Sluka; Richard McGowan
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 3.  Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Ryan P Finnan; Lynn A Crosby
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 4.  Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  H Ellman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Deep partial rotator cuff tear: transtendon repair or tear completion and repair? A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Mario Borroni; Raffaele Garofalo; Giacomo Delle Rose; Eugenio Cesari; Roberto Padua; Marco Conti; Stefano Gumina
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  When Should We Repair Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears? Outcome Comparison Between Immediate Surgical Repair Versus Delayed Repair After 6-Month Period of Nonsurgical Treatment.

Authors:  Yang-Soo Kim; Hyo-Jin Lee; Jong-Ho Kim; Dong-Young Noh
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Clinical Outcomes of Modified Mason-Allen Single-Row Repair for Bursal-Sided Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: Comparison With the Double-Row Suture-Bridge Technique.

Authors:  Sang-Jin Shin; Seung-Hwan Kook; Nandan Rao; Myeong-Jae Seo
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Outcome of nonoperative treatment of symptomatic rotator cuff tears monitored by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Eran Maman; Craig Harris; Lawrence White; George Tomlinson; Misra Shashank; Erin Boynton
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Grade of coracoacromial ligament degeneration as a predictive factor for impingement syndrome and type of partial rotator cuff tear.

Authors:  Ulunay Kanatli; Tacettin Ayanoğlu; Erdem Aktaş; M Baybars Ataoğlu; Mustafa Özer; Mehmet Çetinkaya
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: clinical and imaging outcomes and prognostic factors of successful nonoperative treatment.

Authors:  Ian K Lo; Matthew R Denkers; Kristie D More; Atiba A Nelson; Gail M Thornton; Richard S Boorman
Journal:  Open Access J Sports Med       Date:  2018-09-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.