Literature DB >> 3225230

Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. III. Tuning curves and thresholds at CF.

J J Guinan1, M L Gifford.   

Abstract

In order to study the effects of efferent activity, olivocochlear efferents were stimulated with an electrode in the fourth ventricle at the decussation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle (midline-OCB stimulation) or with an electrode at the brainstem origin of medial efferents (MOC stimulation). Tuning curves, or similar measures of threshold, were obtained from auditory-nerve fibers in the presence or absence of efferent stimulation. Efferent stimulation raised the thresholds of fibers for tones at the characteristic frequency (CF) by an amount which varied with the spontaneous rate (SR) of the auditory-nerve fiber. On the average, high-SR fibers had the smallest threshold shifts, and low-SR fibers had the largest threshold shifts. The distribution of threshold shifts as a function of CF peaked at CFs of 3-8 kHz for high-SR and medium-SR fibers but appeared to peak at higher CFs for low-SR fibers. Within the high-SR or medium-SR groups, the fibers with the lowest thresholds had the largest threshold shifts. Efferent stimulation decreased the Q20 of the tuning curves from most fibers (i.e. it made the tuning curves wider), but increased the Q20 from some fibers with CFs below 2 kHz. For fibers with CFs above 4 kHz, efferent stimulation shifted the tuning-curve tails to higher sound levels by about 1 dB on the average. The qualitative patterns of the effects due to midline-OCB stimulation or to MOC stimulation were similar. The distribution of high-SR threshold shifts vs. CF appears to be displaced apically in the cochlea compared to the distribution of MOC endings on outer hair cells. This can be understood in terms of efferent activity depressing basilar membrane motion and affecting regions at, and apical to, the activated efferent synapses. To explain the low-SR threshold shifts, an additional way in which efferent activity inhibits responses appears to be required. The data are consistent with one function of the medial efferents being to raise the thresholds of auditory-nerve fibers and thereby adjust the effective range of the auditory system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3225230     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90075-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  30 in total

Review 1.  Protection from acoustic trauma is not a primary function of the medial olivocochlear efferent system.

Authors:  E Christopher Kirk; David W Smith
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-06-06

2.  The time course of cochlear gain reduction measured using a more efficient psychophysical technique.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Medial-olivocochlear-efferent inhibition of the first peak of auditory-nerve responses: evidence for a new motion within the cochlea.

Authors:  John J Guinan; Tai Lin; Holden Cheng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Simultaneous measurement of noise-activated middle-ear muscle reflex and stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Shawn S Goodman; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-03-28

Review 5.  Efferent-mediated control of basilar membrane motion.

Authors:  N P Cooper; J J Guinan
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Precursor effects on behavioral estimates of frequency selectivity and gain in forward masking.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Ryan Deeter; Rebekah Abel; Lauren Calandruccio; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Contralateral efferent reflex effects on threshold and suprathreshold psychoacoustical tuning curves at low and high frequencies.

Authors:  Enzo Aguilar; Almudena Eustaquio-Martin; Enrique A Lopez-Poveda
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-20

9.  Acoustic stimulation of human medial olivocochlear efferents reduces stimulus-frequency and click-evoked otoacoustic emission delays: Implications for cochlear filter bandwidths.

Authors:  Nikolas A Francis; John J Guinan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Dynamic range adaptation to sound level statistics in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Bo Wen; Grace I Wang; Isabel Dean; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.