Literature DB >> 32251265

Blood-based biomarkers for prediction of intracranial hemorrhage and outcome in patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury.

Taylor N Anderson1, Jun Hwang, Myrna Munar, Linda Papa, Holly E Hinson, Allison Vaughan, Susan E Rowell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early identification of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) has implications for triage and intervention. Blood-based biomarkers were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for prediction of ICH in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). We sought to determine if biomarkers measured early after injury improve prediction of mortality and clinical/radiologic outcomes compared with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) alone in patients with moderate or severe TBI (MS-TBI).
METHODS: We measured glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP-2) on arrival to the emergency department (ED) in patients with blunt TBI enrolled in the placebo arm of the Prehospital TXA for TBI Trial (prehospital GCS score, 3-12; SPB, > 90). Biomarkers were modeled individually and together with prehospital predictor variables [PH] (GCS score, age, sex). Data were divided into a training data set and test data set for model derivation and evaluation. Models were evaluated for prediction of ICH, mass lesion, 48-hour and 28-day mortality, and 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) and Disability Rating Scale (DRS). Area under the curve (AUC) was evaluated in test data for PH alone, PH + individual biomarkers, and PH + three biomarkers.
RESULTS: Of 243 patients with baseline samples (obtained a median of 84 minutes after injury), prehospital GCS score was 8 (interquartile range, 5-10), 55% had ICH, and 48-hour and 28-day mortality were 7% and 13%, respectively. Poor neurologic outcome at 6 months was observed in 34% based on GOS-E of 4 or less, and 24% based on DRS greater than or equal to7. Addition of each biomarker to PH improved AUC in the majority of predictive models. GFAP+PH compared with PH alone significantly improved AUC in all models (ICH, 0.82 vs. 0.64; 48-hour mortality, 0.84 vs. 0.71; 28-day mortality, 0.84 vs. 0.66; GOS-E, 0.78 vs. 0.69; DRS, 0.84 vs. 0.81, all p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Circulating blood-based biomarkers may improve prediction of neurological outcomes and mortality in patients with MS-TBI over prehospital characteristics alone. Glial fibrillary acidic protein appears to be the most promising. Future evaluation in the prehospital setting is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, Prognostic and Epidemiological, level II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32251265      PMCID: PMC7311234          DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg        ISSN: 2163-0755            Impact factor:   3.697


  32 in total

1.  Post hoc ergo propter hoc: the story of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium.

Authors:  David B Hoyt
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Increased levels of serum MAP-2 at 6-months correlate with improved outcome in survivors of severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Stefania Mondello; Andrea Gabrielli; Sheila Catani; Mariagrazia D'Ippolito; Andreas Jeromin; Antonio Ciaramella; Paola Bossù; Kara Schmid; Frank Tortella; Kevin K W Wang; Ronald L Hayes; Rita Formisano
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Microtubule-associated protein 2, an early blood marker of ischemic brain injury.

Authors:  Dongsun Park; Seong S Joo; Hong J Lee; Kyung-Chul Choi; Seung U Kim; Yun-Bae Kim
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Prognostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale and pupil reactivity in traumatic brain injury assessed pre-hospital and on enrollment: an IMPACT analysis.

Authors:  Anthony Marmarou; Juan Lu; Isabella Butcher; Gillian S McHugh; Gordon D Murray; Ewout W Steyerberg; Nino A Mushkudiani; Sung Choi; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Prognostic value of admission laboratory parameters in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study.

Authors:  Jackelien G M Van Beek; Nino A Mushkudiani; Ewout W Steyerberg; Isabella Butcher; Gillian S McHugh; Juan Lu; Anthony Marmarou; Gordon D Murray; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.269

6.  Prognostic value of secondary insults in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study.

Authors:  Gillian S McHugh; Doortje C Engel; Isabella Butcher; Ewout W Steyerberg; Juan Lu; Nino Mushkudiani; Adrián V Hernández; Anthony Marmarou; Andrew I R Maas; Gordon D Murray
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for prediction of absence of intracranial injuries on head CT (ALERT-TBI): a multicentre observational study.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Bazarian; Peter Biberthaler; Robert D Welch; Lawrence M Lewis; Pal Barzo; Viktoria Bogner-Flatz; P Gunnar Brolinson; Andras Büki; James Y Chen; Robert H Christenson; Dallas Hack; J Stephen Huff; Sandeep Johar; J Dedrick Jordan; Bernd A Leidel; Tobias Lindner; Elizabeth Ludington; David O Okonkwo; Joseph Ornato; W Frank Peacock; Kara Schmidt; Joseph A Tyndall; Arastoo Vossough; Andy S Jagoda
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 44.182

8.  Neuronal and glial markers are differently associated with computed tomography findings and outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a case control study.

Authors:  Stefania Mondello; Linda Papa; Andras Buki; M Ross Bullock; Endre Czeiter; Frank C Tortella; Kevin K Wang; Ronald L Hayes
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  A Systematic Review of the Usefulness of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein for Predicting Acute Intracranial Lesions following Head Trauma.

Authors:  Teemu M Luoto; Rahul Raj; Jussi P Posti; Andrew J Gardner; William J Panenka; Grant L Iverson
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 10.  Biomarkers in traumatic brain injury (TBI): a review.

Authors:  Aaron Dadas; Jolewis Washington; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Damir Janigro
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.570

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers for traumatic brain injury: a short review.

Authors:  Marcela Usberti Gutierre; João Paulo Mota Telles; Leonardo Christiaan Welling; Nícollas Nunes Rabelo; Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira; Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Prognostic value of day-of-injury plasma GFAP and UCH-L1 concentrations for predicting functional recovery after traumatic brain injury in patients from the US TRACK-TBI cohort: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Frederick K Korley; Sonia Jain; Xiaoying Sun; Ava M Puccio; John K Yue; Raquel C Gardner; Kevin K W Wang; David O Okonkwo; Esther L Yuh; Pratik Mukherjee; Lindsay D Nelson; Sabrina R Taylor; Amy J Markowitz; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Geoffrey T Manley
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 59.935

Review 3.  Brain Injury Biomarkers for Predicting Outcome After Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Jaana Humaloja; Nicholas J Ashton; Markus B Skrifvars
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Vibrational Spectroscopy for the Triage of Traumatic Brain Injury Computed Tomography Priority and Hospital Admissions.

Authors:  Ashton G Theakstone; Paul M Brennan; Katherine Ashton; Endre Czeiter; Michael D Jenkinson; Khaja Syed; Matthew J Reed; Matthew J Baker
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.869

Review 5.  Blood GFAP as an emerging biomarker in brain and spinal cord disorders.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelhak; Matteo Foschi; Samir Abu-Rumeileh; John K Yue; Lucio D'Anna; Andre Huss; Patrick Oeckl; Albert C Ludolph; Jens Kuhle; Axel Petzold; Geoffrey T Manley; Ari J Green; Markus Otto; Hayrettin Tumani
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 44.711

6.  Development of a novel, sensitive translational immunoassay to detect plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) after murine traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Emily B Button; Wai Hang Cheng; Carlos Barron; Honor Cheung; Asma Bashir; Jennifer Cooper; Jasmine Gill; Sophie Stukas; David C Baron; Jerome Robert; Elyn M Rowe; Peter A Cripton; Cheryl L Wellington
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 6.982

7.  A predictive model for postoperative progressive haemorrhagic injury in traumatic brain injuries.

Authors:  Tiange Chen; Siming Chen; Yun Wu; Yilei Chen; Lei Wang; Jinfang Liu
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.474

8.  Serum markers of brain injury can predict good neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Marion Moseby-Knappe; Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren; Pascal Stammet; Sofia Backman; Kaj Blennow; Josef Dankiewicz; Hans Friberg; Christian Hassager; Janneke Horn; Jesper Kjaergaard; Gisela Lilja; Christian Rylander; Susann Ullén; Johan Undén; Erik Westhall; Matt P Wise; Henrik Zetterberg; Niklas Nielsen; Tobias Cronberg
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Blood Biomarkers for Detection of Brain Injury in COVID-19 Patients.

Authors:  Steven T DeKosky; Patrick M Kochanek; Alex B Valadka; Robert S B Clark; Sherry H-Y Chou; Alicia K Au; Christopher Horvat; Ruchira M Jha; Rebekah Mannix; Stephen R Wisniewski; Max Wintermark; Susan E Rowell; Robert D Welch; Lawrence Lewis; Stacey House; Rudolph E Tanzi; Darci R Smith; Amy Y Vittor; Nancy D Denslow; Michael D Davis; Olena Y Glushakova; Ronald L Hayes
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 5.269

10.  A dynamic model to predict long-term outcomes in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness.

Authors:  Junwei Kang; Lianghua Huang; Yunliang Tang; Gengfa Chen; Wen Ye; Jun Wang; Zhen Feng
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.682

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.