Taylor N Anderson1, Jun Hwang, Myrna Munar, Linda Papa, Holly E Hinson, Allison Vaughan, Susan E Rowell. 1. From the School of Medicine (T.N.A.), Department of Neurology (H.E.H.), Department of Surgery (S.E.R.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Department of Biostatistics (J.H.), University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; College of Pharmacy (M.M.), Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon; Department of Emergency Medicine (L.P.), Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, Florida; Department of Surgery (A.V.), Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, Georgia; and Department of Surgery (S.E.R.), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early identification of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) has implications for triage and intervention. Blood-based biomarkers were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for prediction of ICH in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). We sought to determine if biomarkers measured early after injury improve prediction of mortality and clinical/radiologic outcomes compared with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) alone in patients with moderate or severe TBI (MS-TBI). METHODS: We measured glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP-2) on arrival to the emergency department (ED) in patients with blunt TBI enrolled in the placebo arm of the Prehospital TXA for TBI Trial (prehospital GCS score, 3-12; SPB, > 90). Biomarkers were modeled individually and together with prehospital predictor variables [PH] (GCS score, age, sex). Data were divided into a training data set and test data set for model derivation and evaluation. Models were evaluated for prediction of ICH, mass lesion, 48-hour and 28-day mortality, and 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) and Disability Rating Scale (DRS). Area under the curve (AUC) was evaluated in test data for PH alone, PH + individual biomarkers, and PH + three biomarkers. RESULTS: Of 243 patients with baseline samples (obtained a median of 84 minutes after injury), prehospital GCS score was 8 (interquartile range, 5-10), 55% had ICH, and 48-hour and 28-day mortality were 7% and 13%, respectively. Poor neurologic outcome at 6 months was observed in 34% based on GOS-E of 4 or less, and 24% based on DRS greater than or equal to7. Addition of each biomarker to PH improved AUC in the majority of predictive models. GFAP+PH compared with PH alone significantly improved AUC in all models (ICH, 0.82 vs. 0.64; 48-hour mortality, 0.84 vs. 0.71; 28-day mortality, 0.84 vs. 0.66; GOS-E, 0.78 vs. 0.69; DRS, 0.84 vs. 0.81, all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Circulating blood-based biomarkers may improve prediction of neurological outcomes and mortality in patients with MS-TBI over prehospital characteristics alone. Glial fibrillary acidic protein appears to be the most promising. Future evaluation in the prehospital setting is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, Prognostic and Epidemiological, level II.
BACKGROUND: Early identification of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) has implications for triage and intervention. Blood-based biomarkers were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for prediction of ICH in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). We sought to determine if biomarkers measured early after injury improve prediction of mortality and clinical/radiologic outcomes compared with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) alone in patients with moderate or severe TBI (MS-TBI). METHODS: We measured glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP-2) on arrival to the emergency department (ED) in patients with blunt TBI enrolled in the placebo arm of the Prehospital TXA for TBI Trial (prehospital GCS score, 3-12; SPB, > 90). Biomarkers were modeled individually and together with prehospital predictor variables [PH] (GCS score, age, sex). Data were divided into a training data set and test data set for model derivation and evaluation. Models were evaluated for prediction of ICH, mass lesion, 48-hour and 28-day mortality, and 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) and Disability Rating Scale (DRS). Area under the curve (AUC) was evaluated in test data for PH alone, PH + individual biomarkers, and PH + three biomarkers. RESULTS: Of 243 patients with baseline samples (obtained a median of 84 minutes after injury), prehospital GCS score was 8 (interquartile range, 5-10), 55% had ICH, and 48-hour and 28-day mortality were 7% and 13%, respectively. Poor neurologic outcome at 6 months was observed in 34% based on GOS-E of 4 or less, and 24% based on DRS greater than or equal to7. Addition of each biomarker to PH improved AUC in the majority of predictive models. GFAP+PH compared with PH alone significantly improved AUC in all models (ICH, 0.82 vs. 0.64; 48-hour mortality, 0.84 vs. 0.71; 28-day mortality, 0.84 vs. 0.66; GOS-E, 0.78 vs. 0.69; DRS, 0.84 vs. 0.81, all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Circulating blood-based biomarkers may improve prediction of neurological outcomes and mortality in patients with MS-TBI over prehospital characteristics alone. Glial fibrillary acidic protein appears to be the most promising. Future evaluation in the prehospital setting is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective, Prognostic and Epidemiological, level II.
Authors: Stefania Mondello; Andrea Gabrielli; Sheila Catani; Mariagrazia D'Ippolito; Andreas Jeromin; Antonio Ciaramella; Paola Bossù; Kara Schmid; Frank Tortella; Kevin K W Wang; Ronald L Hayes; Rita Formisano Journal: Brain Inj Date: 2012-07-13 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Dongsun Park; Seong S Joo; Hong J Lee; Kyung-Chul Choi; Seung U Kim; Yun-Bae Kim Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Anthony Marmarou; Juan Lu; Isabella Butcher; Gillian S McHugh; Gordon D Murray; Ewout W Steyerberg; Nino A Mushkudiani; Sung Choi; Andrew I R Maas Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Jackelien G M Van Beek; Nino A Mushkudiani; Ewout W Steyerberg; Isabella Butcher; Gillian S McHugh; Juan Lu; Anthony Marmarou; Gordon D Murray; Andrew I R Maas Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Gillian S McHugh; Doortje C Engel; Isabella Butcher; Ewout W Steyerberg; Juan Lu; Nino Mushkudiani; Adrián V Hernández; Anthony Marmarou; Andrew I R Maas; Gordon D Murray Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Jeffrey J Bazarian; Peter Biberthaler; Robert D Welch; Lawrence M Lewis; Pal Barzo; Viktoria Bogner-Flatz; P Gunnar Brolinson; Andras Büki; James Y Chen; Robert H Christenson; Dallas Hack; J Stephen Huff; Sandeep Johar; J Dedrick Jordan; Bernd A Leidel; Tobias Lindner; Elizabeth Ludington; David O Okonkwo; Joseph Ornato; W Frank Peacock; Kara Schmidt; Joseph A Tyndall; Arastoo Vossough; Andy S Jagoda Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Stefania Mondello; Linda Papa; Andras Buki; M Ross Bullock; Endre Czeiter; Frank C Tortella; Kevin K Wang; Ronald L Hayes Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-06-24 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Teemu M Luoto; Rahul Raj; Jussi P Posti; Andrew J Gardner; William J Panenka; Grant L Iverson Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Frederick K Korley; Sonia Jain; Xiaoying Sun; Ava M Puccio; John K Yue; Raquel C Gardner; Kevin K W Wang; David O Okonkwo; Esther L Yuh; Pratik Mukherjee; Lindsay D Nelson; Sabrina R Taylor; Amy J Markowitz; Ramon Diaz-Arrastia; Geoffrey T Manley Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2022-09 Impact factor: 59.935
Authors: Ashton G Theakstone; Paul M Brennan; Katherine Ashton; Endre Czeiter; Michael D Jenkinson; Khaja Syed; Matthew J Reed; Matthew J Baker Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2022-04-07 Impact factor: 4.869
Authors: Ahmed Abdelhak; Matteo Foschi; Samir Abu-Rumeileh; John K Yue; Lucio D'Anna; Andre Huss; Patrick Oeckl; Albert C Ludolph; Jens Kuhle; Axel Petzold; Geoffrey T Manley; Ari J Green; Markus Otto; Hayrettin Tumani Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 44.711
Authors: Emily B Button; Wai Hang Cheng; Carlos Barron; Honor Cheung; Asma Bashir; Jennifer Cooper; Jasmine Gill; Sophie Stukas; David C Baron; Jerome Robert; Elyn M Rowe; Peter A Cripton; Cheryl L Wellington Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Date: 2021-03-07 Impact factor: 6.982
Authors: Marion Moseby-Knappe; Niklas Mattsson-Carlgren; Pascal Stammet; Sofia Backman; Kaj Blennow; Josef Dankiewicz; Hans Friberg; Christian Hassager; Janneke Horn; Jesper Kjaergaard; Gisela Lilja; Christian Rylander; Susann Ullén; Johan Undén; Erik Westhall; Matt P Wise; Henrik Zetterberg; Niklas Nielsen; Tobias Cronberg Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-08-21 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Steven T DeKosky; Patrick M Kochanek; Alex B Valadka; Robert S B Clark; Sherry H-Y Chou; Alicia K Au; Christopher Horvat; Ruchira M Jha; Rebekah Mannix; Stephen R Wisniewski; Max Wintermark; Susan E Rowell; Robert D Welch; Lawrence Lewis; Stacey House; Rudolph E Tanzi; Darci R Smith; Amy Y Vittor; Nancy D Denslow; Michael D Davis; Olena Y Glushakova; Ronald L Hayes Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 5.269