| Literature DB >> 32249809 |
Chao Zhang1,2, Daoji Wu3,4, Huixue Ren1,2.
Abstract
Industrial waste, such as crude glycerol, was used for vitamin K2 by B. subtilis Z-15. Crude glycerol could be used instead of pure glycerin for vitamin K2 production. The combination of soybean peptone and yeast extract was more conducive to the synthesis of vitamin K2. The optimal composition of medium was obtained by response surface methodology. The results indicated that the optimal medium was as follows: 6.3% crude glycerol, 3.0% soybean peptone concentration and 5.1 g/L yeast extract. Under the optimal culture medium, vitamin K2 production was increased to 45.11 ± 0.62 mg/L. The fermentor test further proved that the use of crude glycerol affected neither the synthesis of vitamin K2 nor the growth of B. subtilis. These investigations could lay a foundation for reducing the pollution of crude glycerol, exploring a late model for vitamin K2 cleaner production.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32249809 PMCID: PMC7136243 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62737-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Effect of various carbon source on vitamin K2 production.
| Carbon source | Concentration (%) | K2 yield(mg/L) | Biomass (g/L) | Prize(kg/dollar) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glycerol | 5 | 35.25 ± 0.76 | 2.84 ± 0.12 | 1.1–1.3 |
| Sucrose | 5 | 21.13 ± 0.52 | 3.44 ± 0.16 | 0.9–1.0 |
| Glucose | 5 | 22.20 ± 0.57 | 3.24 ± 0.10 | 0.60–0.65 |
| Fructose | 5 | 23.01 ± 0.46 | 3.06 ± 0.14 | 1.5–1.6 |
| Lactose | 5 | 19.16 ± 0.43 | 2.30 ± 0.16 | 2.0–2.1 |
| Galactose | 5 | 19.21 ± 0.52 | 2.34 ± 0.16 | 5.0–5.2 |
| Mannose | 5 | 16.14 ± 0.21 | 2.42 ± 0.14 | 65–70 |
| Sorbitol | 5 | 13.42 ± 0.31 | 2.50 ± 0.16 | 1.2–1.4 |
| Crude glycerol | 6.25※ | 24.78 ± 0.42 | 2.72 ± 0.10 | 0.25–0.3 |
※The concentration of crude glycerol was converted equally by the control group (glycerol, 5%).
Figure 1Effect of crude glycerol concentration on vitamin K2 production.
Effect of various nitrogen source on vitamin K2 production.
| Carbon source | Concentration (%) | K2 yield(mg/L) | Biomass (g/L) | Prize(kg/dollar) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soybean peptone | 3 | 35.20 ± 0.61 | 2.80 ± 0.10 | 2.4–2.6 |
| Yeast extract | 3 | 32.53 ± 0.50 | 3.58 ± 0.11 | 3.0–3.5 |
| Soybean peptone+ yeast extract | 1.5 + 1.5 | 39.69 ± 0.52 | 3.80 ± 0.14 | 2.7–3.0 |
| Beef extract | 3 | 27.21 ± 0.42 | 2.62 ± 0.10 | 4.0–4.2 |
| (NH4)2SO4 | 3 | 19.09 ± 0.21 | 2.22 ± 0.10 | 0.2–0.3 |
| NH4Cl | 3 | 24.21 ± 0.35 | 2.08 ± 0.11 | 0.12–0.14 |
| NaNO3 | 3 | 22.11 ± 0.20 | 2.06 ± 0.10 | 0.5–0.6 |
| NH4NO3 | 3 | 19.40 ± 0.26 | 2.42 ± 0.10 | 0.3–0.4 |
| Soybean meal | 3 | 18.32 ± 0.41 | 2.12 ± 0.11 | 0.5–0.6 |
Figure 2Effect of soybean peptone concentration and yeast extract concentration on vitamin K2 production. (a) soybean peptone; (b) yeast extract.
BBD experiments design matrix.
| Code | A (%) | B (%) | C (g//L) | K2 (mg//L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 41.76 ± 0.23 |
| 2 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 44.15 ± 0.94 |
| 3 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 43.17 ± 0.43 |
| 4 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 41.48 ± 0.50 |
| 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 43.73 ± 0.60 |
| 6 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 42.65 ± 0.41 |
| 7 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 42.47 ± 0.67 |
| 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 41.77 ± 0.46 |
| 9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 44.76 ± 0.47 |
| 10 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 41.30 ± 0.37 |
| 11 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 43.54 ± 0.64 |
| 12 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 41.48 ± 0.64 |
| 13 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 44.53 ± 0.63 |
| 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 44.10 ± 0.52 |
| 15 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 42.89 ± 0.83 |
| 16 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 43.03 ± 0.75 |
| 17 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 43.59 ± 0.75 |
ANOVA of RSM.
| Source | Sum of Squares | Mean Square | F Value | Probe (P) > F |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 18.58 | 2.06 | 9.33 | 0.0038 |
| A | 1.26 | 1.26 | 5.71 | 0.0482 |
| B | 6.612E-003 | 6.612E-003 | 0.030 | 0.8677 |
| C | 6.125E-004 | 6.125E-004 | 2.767E-003 | 0.9595 |
| AB | 0.35 | 0.35 | 1.57 | 0.2501 |
| AC | 2.31 | 2.31 | 10.44 | 0.0144 |
| BC | 1.27 | 1.27 | 5.72 | 0.0481 |
| A2 | 1.91 | 1.91 | 8.62 | 0.0218 |
| B2 | 1.70 | 1.70 | 7.69 | 0.0276 |
| C2 | 8.62 | 8.62 | 38.94 | 0.0004 |
| Residual | 1.55 | 0.22 | ||
| Lack of Fit | 0.91 | 0.30 | 1.89 | 0.2727 |
| Pure Error | 0.64 | 0.16 | ||
| Cor Total | 20.13 |
Figure 3Surface and contour plots of mutual-influence. (1) effect of crude glycerol (A) and soybean peptone (B); (2) effect of crude glycerol (A) and yeast extract (C); and (3) effect of soybean peptone (B) and yeast extract (C).
Figure 4Kinetics of vitamin K2 production and biomass.