Literature DB >> 32248871

The Twitter pandemic: The critical role of Twitter in the dissemination of medical information and misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Hans Rosenberg1, Shahbaz Syed1, Salim Rezaie2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Twitter; pandemic

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32248871      PMCID: PMC7170811          DOI: 10.1017/cem.2020.361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CJEM        ISSN: 1481-8035            Impact factor:   2.410


× No keyword cloud information.
As the world finds itself in the middle of the COVID-19 pandemic, social media has become inundated with content associated with the virus. Although all social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, blogs) are currently providing us with medical content, perhaps no other consistently plays a more prominent role in the medical world than Twitter.[1] Emergency medicine (EM) is on the bleeding edge, where practice at the bedside is continually being shared on social media and this pandemic has resulted in immense activity on Twitter. Twitter is a microblogging and social networking service where users post messages using “tweets” that are limited to 240 characters. For well over a decade, Twitter has become increasingly used as a platform where medical practitioners exchange ideas, information, and commentary. The hashtag #FOAMed garners thousands of tweets per hour, and at this momentous period in medical history, no subject is more prominent than COVID-19. With the free-flow of messages and ideas that are not vetted or peer-reviewed, unlike classic medical educational resources, is there a risk of harm? What are the benefits to the EM community from Twitter? Finally, how does the average emergency physician (EP) get the most out of the information out there?

HARMS

Hysteria. You cannot be on Twitter and paying attention to the pandemic without noticing multiple posts declaring this is the apocalypse. Although tongue in cheek for some, there is a hashtag #apocalypse2020 for all those who are preparing for the end. This is risky for many reasons and, very importantly, the mental well-being of Twitter users. Social media have been associated with increased mental distress, self-harm, and suicide.[2] Additionally, the spread of information is not limited by distance, such that the pandemic of fear can and has spread before the actual C-19 pandemic.[3] This has an effect on our patients’ mental health, putting their physical and mental well-being at risk. This can lead to an increase in suicidal ideation or attempts and is something that the EP has to prepare for at increasing rates during this pandemic. Let's not forget the similar risk to frontline medical providers, being exposed to the same stresses and endangering our mental well-being. Social media platforms are well known for the spread of misinformation and denial of scientific literature. Perhaps, no example is more prominent than the rise of vaccine hesitancy and the role that social media play in the spread of inaccurate and negative information.[4] The current COVID-19 pandemic is not immune to this misinformation and, in fact, is the “first social media pandemic.”[5] Few examples of misinformation are more obvious than U.S. President Donald J. Trump's tweet touting the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as one of the “biggest game changers in the history of medicine.”[6] This, of course, turned out to be a falsehood with multiple respected medical bodies asking for physicians to keep from prescribing the combination.[7] Whether well-intentioned or malicious in nature, the spread of misinformation leads to fear, inappropriate prescribing, less response to warnings on issues such as social-distancing, and mistrust in the medical advice due to the plethora of misinformation. Infographic – Twitter pandemic. A deluge of information. There really is no other way to describe the amount of information being microblogged about COVID-19. This can be a good thing, but the massive amount of information can be overwhelming to the end-user. One of the most commonly cited reasons people do not use platforms such as Twitter is the sheer amount of information. As Choo et al. described it, “drinking from a firehose” of information becomes a barrier to education, whether it relates to COVID-19 pandemic or other topics.

BENEFITS

Fortunately, there are multiple positives to Twitter in the age of the COVID-19 pandemic. It allows users to be inspired by stories of courageous acts, positive role models, and global efforts to combat the pandemic. From frontline health care workers with their tales of unimaginable sacrifices, to the non-medical users simply surviving through a quarantine period with some humor, these are the type of stories that can help people get through this crisis together. One of these inspiring examples is Dr. Yale Tung Chen, an EP who chronicled his COVID-19 infection, including ultrasound findings,[9] and simultaneously demystifying the illness while educating the world in a novel format. To counter concerns regarding misinformation and the validity of claims being made, Twitter is actively fighting to stop the misinformation or damage that may come to users from posts on their platform.[10] They are actively removing tweets with content that denies global or local health authority recommendations to decrease someone's likelihood of exposure, description of treatments that are harmful or not immediately harmful but are known to be ineffective, content that denies facts about transmission, and claims impersonating official government agencies. These efforts can go a long way in appeasing the real and perceived inaccuracies of the content on the social media platform. One of the criticisms of conventional medical education (textbooks, journals) is that they are often behind the curve in terms of knowledge translation. The benefit of social media is that the content is often more novel. In the middle of a pandemic, the ability to rapidly share information is critical for knowledge translation and dissemination, and Twitter is able to do this in a way that is typically not feasible for textbooks or journals. Most relevant to the EM community, we are seeing the free exchange of protocols/guidelines from specialty groups such as the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, highly reputable international journals (such as Journal of the American Medical Association, New England Journal of Medicine, BMJ [formerly British Medical Journal], and others), and academic/community hospitals. Leading on this front are many of the established medical educators who use Twitter as part of the Free Online Access Medical Education (FOAMed) effort to educate EPs on the global pandemic. Just one of these examples is the “Protected Airway Process” from Dr. Christopher Hicks, widely shared and retweeted by frontline practitioners to ensure that health care providers remain safe during intubations.[11] It's amazing to think that medical professionals everywhere around the globe have the same database of information with the simple use of a website or mobile application. Although the user must remain vigilant in the face of any new information presented to them, these respected institutions and users can equip health care workers worldwide with the knowledge to combat the pandemic. Our advice when using Twitter as a source of information during the COVID-19 global pandemic is the following: Limit your intake. The “firehose” is on 24/7 but you should not be. Set aside some time in the day and stick to that limit. It's a rapidly evolving crisis but not such that it should overwhelm you. Engage in the conversation. Contribute to the discussion or present your ideas/protocols. This form of post-publication feedback may be key to ensuring you are doing what is up to date. Allow yourself to be inspired. This will be a marathon, not a sprint, and you will need these positive stories to keep your spirits up. Ensure you use information from trusted sources. Follow those accounts that truly interest you, unfollow those that don't contribute to your learning. If you are struggling with where to start, follow #COVIDFOAM and #COVIDFOAMED. Consider adding @CJEMonline and @CAEP_Docs to accounts you follow, as we are committed to be the voice of Canadian EPs throughout this pandemic. Most importantly, stay safe.
  5 in total

1.  Twitter as a tool for communication and knowledge exchange in academic medicine: A guide for skeptics and novices.

Authors:  Esther K Choo; Megan L Ranney; Teresa M Chan; N Seth Trueger; Amy E Walsh; Ken Tegtmeyer; Shannon O McNamara; Ricky Y Choi; Christopher L Carroll
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 2.  Smartphones, social media use and youth mental health.

Authors:  Elia Abi-Jaoude; Karline Treurnicht Naylor; Antonio Pignatiello
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak.

Authors:  Anneliese Depoux; Sam Martin; Emilie Karafillakis; Raman Preet; Annelies Wilder-Smith; Heidi Larson
Journal:  J Travel Med       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 8.490

4.  Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy in Canada: Results of a Consultation Study by the Canadian Immunization Research Network.

Authors:  Eve Dubé; Dominique Gagnon; Manale Ouakki; Julie A Bettinger; Maryse Guay; Scott Halperin; Kumanan Wilson; Janice Graham; Holly O Witteman; Shannon MacDonald; William Fisher; Laurence Monnais; Dat Tran; Arnaud Gagneur; Juliet Guichon; Vineet Saini; Jane M Heffernan; Samantha Meyer; S Michelle Driedger; Joshua Greenberg; Heather MacDougall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Social media in knowledge translation and education for physicians and trainees: a scoping review.

Authors:  Teresa M Chan; Kristina Dzara; Sara Paradise Dimeo; Anuja Bhalerao; Lauren A Maggio
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2020-02
  5 in total
  50 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Social Media and Virtual Learning on Cardiology During the COVID-19 Pandemic Era and Beyond.

Authors:  Alpana Senapati; Najah Khan; L Bindu Chebrolu
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep

2.  Epistemic Communities under Active Inference.

Authors:  Mahault Albarracin; Daphne Demekas; Maxwell J D Ramstead; Conor Heins
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.738

Review 3.  [Communication in times of pandemic: information, disinformation, and provisional lessons from the coronavirus crisis].

Authors:  Gonzalo Casino
Journal:  Gac Sanit       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Exploring a rural Latino community's perception of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Sally Moyce; Maria Velazquez; David Claudio; Sophia Thompson; Madeline Metcalf; Elizabeth Aghbashian; Karl Vanderwood; Nathaniel Sisson
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.772

5.  Overview of current state of research on the application of artificial intelligence techniques for COVID-19.

Authors:  Vijay Kumar; Dilbag Singh; Manjit Kaur; Robertas Damaševičius
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2021-05-26

6.  Analysis of top influencers in critical care medicine "twitterverse" in the COVID-19 era: a descriptive study.

Authors:  Ronny Munoz-Acuna; Akiva Leibowitz; Margaret Hayes; Somnath Bose
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Using Twitter to Examine Stigma Against People With Dementia During COVID-19: Infodemiology Study.

Authors:  Juanita-Dawne Bacsu; Sarah Fraser; Alison L Chasteen; Allison Cammer; Karl S Grewal; Lauren E Bechard; Jennifer Bethell; Shoshana Green; Katherine S McGilton; Debra Morgan; Hannah M O'Rourke; Lisa Poole; Raymond J Spiteri; Megan E O'Connell
Journal:  JMIR Aging       Date:  2022-03-31

8.  Scrolling for data or doom during COVID-19?

Authors:  Paige Paulsen; Daniel Fuller
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2020-07-08

9.  Why don't health care workers in France trust the COVID-19 vaccine?

Authors:  Eric Revue; Xavier Eyer; Anthony Chauvin
Journal:  CJEM       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.410

10.  Mental health and quality of life for people with rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis in Aotearoa New Zealand following the COVID-19 national lockdown.

Authors:  Grace Johnstone; Gareth J Treharne; Benjamin D Fletcher; Roisin S M Lamar; Douglas White; Andrew Harrison; Simon Stebbings
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.631

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.