Literature DB >> 35455140

Epistemic Communities under Active Inference.

Mahault Albarracin1,2, Daphne Demekas3, Maxwell J D Ramstead2,4, Conor Heins2,5,6,7.   

Abstract

The spread of ideas is a fundamental concern of today's news ecology. Understanding the dynamics of the spread of information and its co-option by interested parties is of critical importance. Research on this topic has shown that individuals tend to cluster in echo-chambers and are driven by confirmation bias. In this paper, we leverage the active inference framework to provide an in silico model of confirmation bias and its effect on echo-chamber formation. We build a model based on active inference, where agents tend to sample information in order to justify their own view of reality, which eventually leads to them to have a high degree of certainty about their own beliefs. We show that, once agents have reached a certain level of certainty about their beliefs, it becomes very difficult to get them to change their views. This system of self-confirming beliefs is upheld and reinforced by the evolving relationship between an agent's beliefs and observations, which over time will continue to provide evidence for their ingrained ideas about the world. The epistemic communities that are consolidated by these shared beliefs, in turn, tend to produce perceptions of reality that reinforce those shared beliefs. We provide an active inference account of this community formation mechanism. We postulate that agents are driven by the epistemic value that they obtain from sampling or observing the behaviours of other agents. Inspired by digital social networks like Twitter, we build a generative model in which agents generate observable social claims or posts (e.g., 'tweets') while reading the socially observable claims of other agents that lend support to one of two mutually exclusive abstract topics. Agents can choose which other agent they pay attention to at each timestep, and crucially who they attend to and what they choose to read influences their beliefs about the world. Agents also assess their local network's perspective, influencing which kinds of posts they expect to see other agents making. The model was built and simulated using the freely available Python package pymdp. The proposed active inference model can reproduce the formation of echo-chambers over social networks, and gives us insight into the cognitive processes that lead to this phenomenon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active inference; epistemic community; opinion dynamics; social media

Year:  2022        PMID: 35455140      PMCID: PMC9027706          DOI: 10.3390/e24040476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Entropy (Basel)        ISSN: 1099-4300            Impact factor:   2.738


  67 in total

1.  Global and local synchrony of coupled neurons in small-world networks.

Authors:  Naoki Masuda; Kazuyuki Aihara
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  The influence of mood on the search for supporting versus conflicting information: dissonance reduction as a means of mood regulation?

Authors:  Eva Jonas; Verena Graupmann; Dieter Frey
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-01

3.  Neural computations underlying arbitration between model-based and model-free learning.

Authors:  Sang Wan Lee; Shinsuke Shimojo; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Perceiving Social-Emotional Volatility and Triggered Causes of COVID-19.

Authors:  Si Jiang; Hongwei Zhang; Jiayin Qi; Binxing Fang; Tingliang Xu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Uncertainty, epistemics and active inference.

Authors:  Thomas Parr; Karl J Friston
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  Large networks of rational agents form persistent echo chambers.

Authors:  Jens Koed Madsen; Richard M Bailey; Toby D Pilditch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Sentience and the Origins of Consciousness: From Cartesian Duality to Markovian Monism.

Authors:  Karl J Friston; Wanja Wiese; J Allan Hobson
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 2.524

Review 8.  Active inference on discrete state-spaces: A synthesis.

Authors:  Lancelot Da Costa; Thomas Parr; Noor Sajid; Sebastijan Veselic; Victorita Neacsu; Karl Friston
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.223

9.  The mixed instrumental controller: using value of information to combine habitual choice and mental simulation.

Authors:  Giovanni Pezzulo; Francesco Rigoli; Fabian Chersi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-03-04

10.  A mechanism for value-sensitive decision-making.

Authors:  Darren Pais; Patrick M Hogan; Thomas Schlegel; Nigel R Franks; Naomi E Leonard; James A R Marshall
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  The nature of beliefs and believing.

Authors:  Mahault Albarracin; Riddhi J Pitliya
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-07-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.