| Literature DB >> 32248828 |
Dita Musalkova1, Filip Majer2, Ladislav Kuchar1, Ondrej Luksan3, Befekadu Asfaw1, Hana Vlaskova1, Gabriela Storkanova1, Martin Reboun1, Helena Poupetova1, Helena Jahnova1, Helena Hulkova1, Jana Ledvinova1, Lenka Dvorakova1, Jakub Sikora1, Milan Jirsa3, Marie T Vanier4,5, Martin Hrebicek6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Niemann-Pick type C (NP-C) is a rare neurovisceral genetic disorder caused by mutations in the NPC1 or the NPC2 gene. NPC1 is a multipass-transmembrane protein essential for egress of cholesterol from late endosomes/lysosomes. To evaluate impacts of NPC1 mutations, we examined fibroblast cultures from 26 NP-C1 patients with clinical phenotypes ranging from infantile to adult neurologic onset forms. The cells were tested with multiple assays including NPC1 mRNA expression levels and allele expression ratios, assessment of NPC1 promoter haplotypes, NPC1 protein levels, cellular cholesterol staining, localization of the mutant NPC1 proteins to lysosomes, and cholesterol/cholesteryl ester ratios. These results were correlated with phenotypes of the individual patients.Entities:
Keywords: Cholesterol transport; Lysosomal storage disease; Mutant protein; Niemann-pick type C; Proteostasis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32248828 PMCID: PMC7132889 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-01360-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis ISSN: 1750-1172 Impact factor: 4.123
Cohort of NP-C1 patients stratified by NP-C clinical phenotypes and corresponding genotypes and results of the cell analyses
| Patient No. | NP-C Clinical Phenotype | Genotype | NPC1 Promoter haplotype | Allele expression ratio (%) | NPC1 mRNA level (qPCR) | Relative NPC1 protein amount by Western blot | Colocalization object Pearson’s coefficient | UC/CE ratio | Direct Filipin fluorescence vs. control | LDL-induced Cholesterol esterification rate | Evaluation of vesicular cholesterol by diagnostic filipin test | “NP-C Biochemical Profile” |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Early infantile | p.[ | 1/2 | 0.29 ± 0.15 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.07 | 5.8 ± 0.6 | 3.0 ± 0.8 | < 10 | strong | CLA | |
| 2 | Early infantile | p.[N916del];[ | 1/1 | 50/ | 0.56 ± 0.04 | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 0.17 | 8.1 ± 1.7 | 2.6 ± 1.0 | < 10 | massive | CLA |
| 3 | Early infantile | p.[I1061T]; [T1176_S1196del;S1197_V1198ins15]$ | 1/1 | 63/37 | 1.26 ± 0.81 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.12 | 7.0 ± 0.6 | 2.3 ± 0.9 | – | – | – |
| 4 | Early infantile | p.[R1186H];[T1205K] | 1/4 | 54/46 | 0.49 ± 0.21 | 0.04 ± 0.00 | 0.07 | 15.5 ± 1.0 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | < 10 | massive | CLA |
| 5 Sb | Late infantile | p.[Y276H];[R1186H] | 1/1 | 48/52 | 0.87 ± 0.42 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.28 | 10.2 ± 1.5 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | < 10 | massive | CLA |
| 6 Sb | Late infantile | p.[Y276H];[R1186H] | 1/1 | 49/51 | 0.66 ± 0.45 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.24 | 7.7 ± 0.8 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | < 10 | massive | CLA |
| 7 | Late infantile | p.[R1186H];[R1186H] | 1/4 | – | 0.51 ± 0.31 | 0.03 ± 0.00 | 0.15 | 11.9 ± 1.8 | 3.0 ± 0.8 | – | – | – |
| 8 | Late infantile | p.[R1186H];[R1186H] | 1/1 | – | 1.40 ± 0.42 | 0.05 ± 0.01 | 0.27 | 7.1 ± 1.3 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | – | – | – |
| 9 | Late infantile | p.[P1007A];[R1186H] | 1/1 | 49/51 | 0.92 ± 0.30 | 0.85 ± 0.08 | 0.72 | 3.2 ± 0.7 | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 300 | important | INT |
| 10 | Juvenile | p.[S954L];[R1186H] | 1/1 | 51/49 | 0.88 ± 0.14 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.42 | 3.3 ± 0.6 | 1.6 ± 0.3 | 220 | strong | CLA |
| 11 | Juvenile | p.[S954L];[R1186H] | 1/1 | 55/45 | 1.60 ± 0.63 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 0.62 | 3.7 ± 0.9 | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 120 | massive | CLA |
| 12 Cs | Juvenile | p.[S954L];[R1186H] | 1/1 | 51/49 | 1.44 ± 0.19 | 0.29 ± 0.05 | 0.63 | 2.1 ± 1.0 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | – | – | – |
| 13 Cs | Juvenile | p.[S954L];[R1186H] | 1/1 | 52/48 | 0.80 ± 0.27 | 0.36 ± 0.04 | 0.62 | 4.3 ± 0.8 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 185 | abnormal | INT |
| 14 | Juvenile | p.[P474L];[P691L] | 1/2 | 48/52 | 0.93 ± 0.57 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | 0.77 | 2.7 ± 0.8 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 25 | massive | CLA |
| 15 | Juvenile | p.[V950G];[P1007A] | 1/4 | 71/29 | 0.86 ± 0.49 | 0.32 ± 0.00 | 0.77 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 510 | very significant | INT/VAR |
| 16 | Juvenile | p.[R411P];[P1007A] | 1/4 | 51/49 | 1.29 ± 0.75 | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 0.79 | 3.4 ± 0.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1195 | moderate but significant | VAR |
| 17 | Juvenile | p.[R411P];[S954L] | 1/4 | 51/49 | 0.52 ± 0.18 | 0.52 ± 0.06 | 0.68 | 4.6 ± 0.9 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | – | – | – |
| 18 | Juvenile | p.[L176R];[S954L] | 1/1 | 48/52 | 0.60 ± 0.32 | 0.72 ± 0.08 | 0.75 | 3.5 ± 0.6 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | 320 | strong | INT |
| 19 | Juvenile | p.[ | 1/1 | 1.60 ± 0.67 | 0.74 ± 0.03 | 0.67 | 3.5 ± 0.6 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 580 | moderate but significant | VAR | |
| 20 | Juvenile | p.[ | 1/1 | 0.66 ± 0.25 | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 0.58 | 4.2 ± 0.9 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | – | – | – | |
| 21 | Juvenile | p.[ | 1/5 | 0.30 ± 0.13 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.67 | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 220 | massive | CLA | |
| 22 | Juvenile | p.[ | 1/2 | 0.30 ± 0.14 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.71 | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 240 | marked | INT | |
| 23 | Adolescent/Adult | p.[ | 1/1 | 0.25 ± 0.09 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 0.66 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | – | – | – | |
| 24 Sb | Adolescent/Adult | p.[A927V];[A927V] | 2/4 | 52/48 | 0.90 ± 0.37 | 0.49 ± 0.11 | 0.69 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 834 | moderate but significant | VAR |
| 25 Sb | Adolescent/Adult | p.[A927V];[A927V] | 2/4 | – | 0.48 ± 0.30 | 0.73 ± 0.00 | 0.69 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 337 | moderate | VAR |
| 26 Sb | Adolescent/Adult | p.[A927V];[A927V] | 2/4 | 50/50 | 1.11 ± 0.59 | 0.74 ± 0.01 | 0.67 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 870 | moderate but significant | VAR |
Control levels ( | wt | 50/50 | 0.95 (0.35–1.34) | 0.94 (0.56–1.27) | 0.77 (0.71–0.80) | 3.2 (2.3–3.7) | 1.00 (0.80–1.33) | 2950 ± 1200 | normal |
Values in “allele expression ratio” are in the order corresponding to the order of alleles as in the column “deduced protein change”. Bold font indicates frameshift mutations. $ effect of the splice mutation on protein assumed from cDNA analysis in Ribeiro et al. [28] LDL-induced cholesterol esterification rates are expressed in pmol cholesteryl-[3H]oleate formed/mg protein/4.5 h. A column linking the cell lines to patients of the cohort of reference [3] is available in supplementary Table S1. Abbreviations: CLA classical, INT intermediate, VAR variant [18], UC unesterified cholesterol, CE cholesteryl esters, Sb sibling, Cs cousin
Fig. 1aNPC1 promoter haplotype variants and respective luciferase reporter activities in %. Reporter activity of pGL3 basic vector was 0.1 ± 0.1% of Haplotype 1 construct activity. Haplotype 3 is present in controls only. b Immunoreactive NPC1 protein in skin fibroblast lines (Western blotting). The cell line numbers and phenotypes are indicated on the top. Equal amount of protein (8 μg) was applied per line. Abnormal banding associated with p.Y276H is indicated by arrowheads. CCD data were used for the quantification. c The mutations are depicted using crystal structure of NPC1 protein 3JD8 [40] and the domains are color-coded according to Li [11]. A schematic of primary structure of the mature NPC1 protein is shown below the structure - domain color coding. NTD – N-terminal domain, TM – transmembrane domain, MLD - middle luminal domain, SSD – sterol sensing domain. The most severe mutations are indicated in bold font. Most of the mutations are in lumenal domains I and C (color-coded circles beside the mutation labels). d Representative images of human skin fibroblasts of a control and patients with selected forms of the disease. 1st column: direct filipin stained cultures. 2nd column: confocal microscopy images anti-NPC1 signal. 3rd column: merge of anti-LAMP2 (red) and anti-NPC1 (green) signal, 4th column: co-localization overlay maps. Values 0 - 1 of the pixels are displayed using lookup table LUT 0–1. All images were processed equally
Fig. 2Overview of NP-C1 patient fibroblasts analyses. Strip plots show results of assays for the four phenotypic subgroups. Solid circles represent individual patient cell lines. Numbers adjacent to the circles represent patient number. The long-dashed and dashed horizontal lines represent the average control levels and standard error of means, respectively. Asterisks above the boxplots (2a, 2b, 2d, 2e) mark groups that differ significantly from controls. The groups were compared by one-way ANOVA test followed by post-hoc Tukey’s HSD test adjusted for unequal sample sizes. aNPC1 mRNA expression level, b NPC1 protein level by Western Blotting, c endosomal / lysosomal localisation of NPC1 protein. NPC1 vs. LAMP2 Object Pearson’s colocalization coefficient, d unesterified cholesterol / cholesterol ester ratio by MS/MS, e direct filipin staining of cellular unesterified cholesterol, f cholesterol esterification rate of LDL-derived cholesterol