Literature DB >> 32246431

Clear plastic drapes may be effective at limiting aerosolization and droplet spray during extubation: implications for COVID-19.

Clyde T Matava1, Julie Yu2, Simon Denning2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32246431      PMCID: PMC7124129          DOI: 10.1007/s12630-020-01649-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   6.713


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor, Health care providers (HCPs) performing aerosol-generating medical procedures (AGMP) in patients with the disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), also known as coronavirus disease (COVID-19), are considered to be at higher risk for contracting the disease.1 Reports on the airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 have resulted in concerns over increased risk for infection, especially with global shortages of personal protection equipment (PPE) needed for droplet precautions.2 Contamination of surfaces and personnel with virus-loaded droplets may occur during high-risk AGMP, such as intubation and extubation. A recent report recommended the use of gauze around the patient’s mouth as a method for reducing the aerosolization of the virus.1 Our group performed a series of experiments assessing whether clear plastic drapes were effective in containing aerosolization during extubation. These experiments did not require institutional research ethics approval. All experiments utilized Glo-germ™ (Glo Germ Company, Moab, UT, USA), a fluorescent resin powder with particle sizes between 1 and 5 µm (SARS-COV-2 is 0.07–1.2 µm), with ultraviolet light detection in a darkened operating room. A pediatric mannequin (Eletripod ET/J10 Tracheal Intubation model, Tuqi, China) was used. Simulated secretions (0.5 mL of Glo-germ) were applied to the oropharynx and the mid-trachea of the mannequin. A cough was simulated using a calibrated medical air gun connected to the distal trachea, fired over 0.4 sec, delivering cough peak expiratory flow rates (CPEFR) of 150–180 L·min−1 outward from the trachea. The normal CPEFR ranges from 87 L·min−1 in children under one year to 728 L·min−1 in some adults; a CPEFR < 175 L·min−1 is predictive of failure to extubate in adults.3–5 Between experiments, the mannequin was cleaned with alcohol, soap, and water. All experiments were video recorded (240 fps) using a combination of GoPro Hero 6 (GoPro Inc, San Mateo, CA, USA), iPhone X, X Max, and XR (Apple Inc, Cupertino, CA, USA). In the first series of experiments (Exp), we simulated a cough during extubation of the mannequin both without (Exp 1A) and with (Exp 1B) a single clear plastic drape applied over the head and endotracheal tube. We then repeated the same extubation cough sequence in a second series of experiments (Exp 2) using a modified three-layer plastic drape configuration. The first layer was placed under the head of the mannequin to protect the operating table and linen. The second torso-drape layer was applied from the neck down and over the chest, preventing contamination of the upper torso. The final over-head top drape was a clear plastic drape with a sticky edge that was secured at the mid-sternum level. It was draped over the patient’s head to prevent contamination of the surrounding surfaces, including the HCPs. After the cough was complete, the top two drapes were rolled away together toward the patient’s legs to contain and remove the contaminant, and the third drape was removed afterwards. A cough without any plastic drapes applied (Exp 1A) resulted in a wide distribution of droplets contaminating the surrounding areas (Figure A and eVideo in the Electronic Supplementary Material [ESM]).1 The use of a single clear plastic drape (Exp 1B) restricted the aerosolization and droplet spraying of the particles, but using the three-drape technique (Exp 2) significantly reduced contamination of the immediate area surrounding the patient (Figure B; eVideo in the ESM). An area of significant contamination, a “hot-zone”, was noted on the drape covering the bed beneath the mannequin head (Figure C). The patient’s face and head were also contaminated (Figure C). Nevertheless, we were able to successfully remove these drapes (by rolling them up) without further contamination of the area or the HCP. This was evidenced by the lack of fluorescent particles on visual inspection. The distribution of particles following the use of a three-layered clear plastic drape configuration for extubation with a simulated cough. A) In experiment (Exp) 1A described in the text, coughing during extubation contaminated the airspace around the patient, including the torso, face, head, and bed. B) In Exp 2, a three-panel clear plastic drape was used: first layer placed under the head of the mannequin to protect the operating table and linen; second torso-drape layer applied from the neck down and over the chest, preventing contamination of the upper torso; third over-head top drape with a sticky edge secured at the mid-sternum level. The clear plastic drapes restrict contamination (white fluorescent particles) to the areas between the top clear plastic and the bottom clear plastic drape, as seen in the view from the patient’s head under the third drape covering the face. C) Following removal of the top clear plastic drape and torso clear plastic drape in Exp 2, the contamination is restricted to the area previously under the top clear plastic drape. There is no contamination of the area previously covered by the torso clear plastic drape. Our series of experiments (each performed once) were proof-of-concept on the patterns of aerosolization and droplet sprays during extubation and the impact of clear drapes. We showed that the use of low-cost barriers (clear plastic drapes) was able to significantly limit aerosolization and droplet spray. Protection of frontline HCPs is paramount. Nevertheless, PPE is a limited resource and often requires providers to be adaptive and resourceful in a crisis. The inexpensive and simple method of using clear drapes during extubation (and possibly intubation) of COVID-19 patients may be considered by frontline HCPs and infection control specialists as an additional precaution. Modifications of the clear plastics can be adapted for surgical procedures that may be AGMPs. Limitations of this work include its low-fidelity design and use of a larger particle (Glo-Germ) that may not reflect true spread of a virus like SARS-CoV-2. It is particularly important that HCPs take care not to generate further aerosols when removing the drapes; and we recommend using the three-panel draping as opposed to the single-drape technique. Further studies will be needed to further refine this model and its findings. Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 The use of a single clear plastic drape in minimizing aerosolization, droplet spraying, and room contamination. This concept has been reported elsewhere (https://twitter.com/innov8doc/status/1240455223929458696) (MP4 12690 kb)
  3 in total

1.  Stability and Viability of SARS-CoV-2. Reply.

Authors:  Seth D Judson; Neeltje van Doremalen; Vincent J Munster
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Maximum voluntary cough: an indication of airway function.

Authors:  C S Beardsmore; S P Wimpress; A H Thomson; H R Patel; P Goodenough; H Simpson
Journal:  Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct

3.  Distant survival for patients undergoing surgery using volatile versus IV anesthesia for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Xiao-Yan Meng; Xiu-Ping Zhang; Zhe Sun; Hong-Qian Wang; Wei-Feng Yu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 2.217

  3 in total
  55 in total

1.  Barrier Devices, Intubation, and Aerosol Mitigation Strategies: PPE in the Time of COVID-19.

Authors:  Eric A Fried; George Zhou; Ronak Shah; Da Wi Shin; Anjan Shah; Daniel Katz; Garrett W Burnett
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Safety of Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Comparison to the Pre-Pandemic Era.

Authors:  Meriem Amarouche; Samin Rashid; John Eraifej; Anouk Borg; Jane Halliday; Orlando J Warner; Simon A Cudlip
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-05-27

3.  Aerosolization in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Risk Mitigation in the COVID-19 Era: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Catherine F Roy; Emily Kay-Rivest; Lily H P Nguyen; Denis Sirhan; Marc A Tewfik
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2020-12-04

4.  A comparison of droplet and contact contamination using 3 simulated barrier techniques for COVID-19 intubation: a quality assurance study.

Authors:  Peter Rose; John Veall; Navraj Chima; Elena Vowels; Shruti Chitnis; Alana Flexman; Raymond Tang
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-08-31

5.  Preventing Contamination During Transesophageal Echocardiography in the Face of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Glo Germ Experience.

Authors:  Amy J Moulthrop; Lavinia M Kolarczyk; Emily G Teeter
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Comparative evaluation of intubation performances using two different barrier devices used in the COVID-19 era: A manikin based pilot study.

Authors:  Ashish Kannaujia; Rudrashish Haldar; Rafat Shamim; Prabhakar Mishra; Anil Agarwal
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2021-04-01

7.  Anaesthesia and Critical Care Department at a Major Academic Centre's Adaptation to Face the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Sara Farsi; Nada Noaman; Auhood Bukhary; Wadeeah Bahaziq; Alaa Sabbahi; Ibrahim Abushoshah; Abdulaziz Boker
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-07-15

Review 8.  A review on recent trends of antiviral nanoparticles and airborne filters: special insight on COVID-19 virus.

Authors:  Ali A Jazie; Amar J Albaaji; Suhad A Abed
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.804

Review 9.  The barrier techniques for airway management in covid-19 patients - review of literature.

Authors:  Pratishtha Yadav; Rakesh Garg
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-15

10.  Computational modelling of an aerosol extraction device for use in COVID-19 surgical tracheotomy.

Authors:  Hadrien Calmet; Pablo Ferrer Bertomeu; Charlotte McIntyre; Catherine Rennie; Kevin Gouder; Guillaume Houzeaux; Christian Fletcher; Robert Still; Denis Doorly
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 3.433

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.