| Literature DB >> 32245208 |
Jong-Ho Kim1, I-Rang Lim1, Chi-Yeon Park1, Hyung Joon Joo1, Ji-Min Noh1, Seung-Cheol Choi1, Soon Jun Hong1, Do-Sun Lim1.
Abstract
Thymosin β4 (Tβ4) is a G-actin sequestering protein that contributes to diverse cellular activities, such as migration and angiogenesis. In this study, the beneficial effects of combined cell therapy with Tβ4 andEntities:
Keywords: Adipose-derived stem cells; Endothelial Differentiation; Hindlimb ischemia; Thymosin β4; Vascularization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32245208 PMCID: PMC7139370 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21062166
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Treatment with Tβ4 promotes morphological changes in hASCs. (A) Immunofluorescence images of cell surface markers in hASCs indicate positive expression for CD13, CD29, CD44, CD90, CD106, Stro-1, and HLA-ABC and negative expression for CD14, CD31, CD34, CD71, and CD117. Scale bar = 100 μm. (B) Real-time PCR analysis of relative endogenous TMSB4X mRNA expression in hASCs after 24 h of dose-dependent exogenous treatment with Tβ4 (0, 50, and 100 ng/mL). * p < 0.05 vs. 0 ng/mL; # p < 0.05 vs. 50 ng/mL. (C) Representative phase-contrast images of hASCs at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after a single Tβ4 treatment (100 ng/mL). Scale bar = 100 μm. (D) Elongated cell length after a single treatment with Tβ4 at 24 h and 48 h compared to cell length of untreated cells. * p < 0.05 vs. without Tβ4 treatment. (E) Changes in TMSB4X mRNA expression upon a single Tβ4 treatment. Data are shown as Δ (fold change of 2−∆∆Ct values at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after Tβ4 treatment compared to that without Tβ4 treatment). * p < 0.05 vs. 2−∆∆Ct values of without Tβ4 treatment; NS, not significant; w/ Tβ4, with Tβ4 treatment; w/o Tβ4, without Tβ4 treatment.
Figure 2Tβ4 induces the active state of hASCs. (A) Representative phase-contrast images and (B) Quantitative analysis of cell length along the long axis of hASCs after long-term exogenous treatment with Tβ4 (100 ng/mL). Scale bar = 100 μm. * p < 0.05 vs. without Tβ4 at each time point. (C) Immunofluorescence images and (D) Quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensities of Tβ4 after 24 h of treating hASCs in combination with Tβ4. Actin cytoskeleton (F-actin) was stained with phalloidin. White arrowheads indicate the elongation of the cell body upon Tβ4 expression. Scale bar = 100 μm. * p < 0.05 vs. without Tβ4. (E) Activation of the AKT/mTOR and MEK/ERK signaling pathways in hASCs upon Tβ4 treatment confirmed by western blot. Quantitative analysis of band intensities is illustrated in Figure S2A. (F) Representative phase-contrast images of wound healing assay at different time points. Cells were wounded and treated with Tβ4 at 0 h. Scale bar = 100 μm. (G) Quantification of the migrated cell number at 0, 12, 24 h, and 36 h after scratching. * p < 0.05 vs. without Tβ4 treatment at each time point. (H) Microbead sprouting assay of hASC-coated microbeads. Beads were seeded on Matrigel and treated with Tβ4. At day 5, hASC-coated microbeads were stained for F-actin. Scale bar = 100 μm. (I) Number of sprouts per bead and (J) sprout length were measured using phase-contrast images. * p < 0.05 vs. without Tβ4 at each time point. (K) Schematic diagram depicts the active state of hASCs upon exogenous treatment with Tβ4 via morphological alterations and activation of intracellular signaling pathways. w/ Tβ4, with Tβ4 treatment; w/o Tβ4, without Tβ4 treatment.
Figure 3Additional treatment with Tβ4 enhances endothelial differentiation of hASCs. (A) Schematic diagram showing the induction of endothelial differentiation of hASCs using CED-M and additional Tβ4 treatment for 21 days. (B) Representative immunofluorescence images of PDGFRβ and VE-cadherin after inducing endothelial differentiation without or with Tβ4 treatment. White arrowheads indicate positive expression of PDGFRβ and VE-cadherin. Scale bar = 100 μm. (C) Quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensities of PDGFRβ and VE-cadherin. * p < 0.05 vs. CED-M-/Tβ4-; # p < 0.05 vs. CED-M+/Tβ4+; -, non-treated; +, treated. (D) Real-time PCR analysis of expression of various genes including ANGPT1, VWF, TIE1, CXCR4, FGFR4, IGFR2, PLAUR, and CDK5 after 21 days of endothelial differentiation induction. * p < 0.05 vs. CED-M-/Tβ4-; # p < 0.05 vs. CED-M+/Tβ4+; -, non-treated; +, treated; w/ Tβ4, with Tβ4 treatment; w/o Tβ4, without Tβ4 treatment.
Figure 4Transplantation of hASCs in combination with Tβ4 improves blood vessel recruitment and blood flow after ischemia. (A) Representative images of mouse dorsal window chamber model after 5 days of transplantation of chambers containing hASCs without or with Tβ4. (B) Quantification of the number of microvessel branches per chamber depending upon the transplantation condition. * p < 0.05 vs. Sham; # p < 0.05 vs. hASCs. n = 3 rats in each group. (C) Representative Laser Doppler images after induction of hindlimb ischemia (day 0) and after 49 days of transplantation. Magnified inlet images show limb loss in the sham group and foot loss in the hASCs group. Sham (n = 6); hASCs (n = 5); Tβ4 + hASCs (n = 6). (D) Measurement of blood flow at day 49, as measured by Laser Doppler images. * p < 0.05 vs. Sham; # p < 0.05 vs. hASCs. (E) Percentage of physiological status of hindlimb after 49 days of ischemia and transplantation. * p < 0.05 vs. Sham; # p < 0.05 vs. hASCs.