Literature DB >> 32245138

Fatigue of Narrow Dental Implants: Influence of the Hardening Method.

R A Pérez1, J Gargallo2, P Altuna2, M Herrero-Climent3, F J Gil1,2.   

Abstract

The use of narrow titanium dental implants (NDI) for small ridges, reduced interdental space, or missing lateral incisors can be a viable option when compared to the conventional wider dental implants. Furthermore, in many cases, standard diameter implant placement may not be possible without grafting procedures, which increases the healing time, cost, and morbidity. The aim of this study was to analyze the mechanical viability of the current narrow implants and how narrow implants can be improved. Different commercially available implants (n = 150) were tested to determine maximum strength, strain to fracture, microhardness, residual stress, and fatigue obtaining the stress-number of cycles to fracture (SN) curve. Fractography was studied by scanning electron microscopy. The results showed that when the titanium was hardened by the addition of 15% of Zr or 12% cold worked, the fatigue limit was higher than the commercially pure grade 4 Ti without hardening treatment. Grade 4 titanium without hardening treatment in narrow dental implants can present fractures by fatigue. These narrow implants are subjected to high mechanical stresses and the mechanical properties of titanium do not meet the minimal requirements, which lead to frequent fractures. New hardening treatments allow for the mechanical limitations of conventional narrow implants to be overcome in dynamic conditions. These hardening treatments allow for the design of narrow dental implants with enhanced fatigue life and long-term behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ti–Zr alloy; commercially pure titanium; fatigue; fracture; hardening; hardness; mechanical properties; narrow dental implants; strain; titanium alloy

Year:  2020        PMID: 32245138     DOI: 10.3390/ma13061429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Materials (Basel)        ISSN: 1996-1944            Impact factor:   3.623


  3 in total

1.  Influence of Connection Type and Platform Diameter on Titanium Dental Implants Fatigue: Non-Axial Loading Cyclic Test Analysis.

Authors:  Ana I Nicolas-Silvente; Eugenio Velasco-Ortega; Ivan Ortiz-Garcia; Alvaro Jimenez-Guerra; Loreto Monsalve-Guil; Raul Ayuso-Montero; Javier Gil; Jose Lopez-Lopez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Corrosion Behavior of Titanium Dental Implants with Implantoplasty.

Authors:  Pablo Lozano; Marta Peña; Mariano Herrero-Climent; Jose Vicente Rios-Santos; Blanca Rios-Carrasco; Aritza Brizuela; Javier Gil
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 3.  Endosseous Dental Implant Materials and Clinical Outcomes of Different Alloys: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Luca Fiorillo; Marco Cicciù; Tolga Fikret Tozum; Matteo Saccucci; Cristiano Orlando; Giovanni Luca Romano; Cesare D'Amico; Gabriele Cervino
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.623

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.