| Literature DB >> 32245001 |
Laila A Al-Mutabagani1, Latifah Abdullah Alshabanah1, Hoda A Ahmed2,3, Mohamed Hagar3,4, Khulood A Abu Al-Ola5.
Abstract
New mesomorphic symmetrical 2:1 supramolecular H-bonded complexes of seven phenyl rings were prepared between 4-n-alkoxyphenylazobenzoic acids and 4-(2-(pyridin-3-yl)diazenyl)phenyl nicotinate. Mesomorphic studies of the prepared complexes were investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarizing optical microscopy (POM). Fermi bands of the formed H-bonded interactions were confirmed by FT-IR spectroscopy. Geometrical parameters for all complexes were performed using the density functional theory (DFT) calculations method. Theoretical results revealed that the prepared H-bonded complexes are in non-linear geometry with U-shaped and wavy-shaped geometrical structures; however, the greater linearity of the wavy-shaped compounds could be the reason for their stability with respect to the U-shaped conformer. Moreover, the stable, wavy shape of supramolecular H-bonded complexes (SMHBCs) has been used to illustrate mesomeric behavior in terms of the molecular interaction. The experimental mesomorphic investigations revealed that all complexes possess enantiotropic smectic C phase. Phases were confirmed by miscibility with a standard smectic C (SmC) compound. A comparison was constructed to investigate the effect of incorporating azophenyl moiety into the mesomeric behavior of the corresponding five-membered complexes. It was found that the addition of the extra phenylazo group to the acid moiety has a great increment of the mesophase stability (TC) values with respect to the monotropic SmC phase of the five aromatic systems to the high stable enantiotropic SmC mesophase.Entities:
Keywords: DFT calculations; U-shaped; phenyl nicotinate; smectic phase; supramolecular H-bonding complexes; wavy-shaped
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32245001 PMCID: PMC7144929 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25061420
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Preparation of 2:1 symmetric supramolecular H-bonded complexes I/An.
Figure 1The calculated molecular geometry of Syn-I, Anti-I, Syn-I/A6 and Anti-I/A6.
Thermal parameters (Hartree/Particle) of both conformers of the base I as well as the H-bonded complexes I/An.
| Conformer | Syn | Anti | Syn | Anti | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameter | I | I | I/A6 | I/A8 | I/A10 | I/A12 | I/A6 | I/A8 | I/A10 | I/A12 |
|
| 0.262 | 0.262 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.4 |
|
| −1024.112 | −1024.112 | −3168.2 | −3325.3 | −3482.4 | −3639.6 | 3168.2 | −3325.3 | −3482.4 | −3639.6 |
|
| −1024.094 | −1024.093 | −3168.1 | −3325.2 | −3482.4 | −3639.5 | −3168.1 | −3325.2 | −3482.4 | −3639.5 |
|
| −1024.093 | −1024.092 | −3168.1 | −3325.2 | −3482.4 | −3639.5 | −3168.1 | −3325.2 | −3482.4 | −3639.5 |
|
| −1024.163 | −1024.163 | −3168.3 | −3325.4 | −3482.6 | −3639.7 | −3168.3 | −3325.4 | −3482.6 | −3639.7 |
Figure 2The estimated plots for frontier molecular orbitals of both conformers of dinitrogen base I.
Figure 3The estimated plots for frontier molecular orbitals of both conformers of the H-bonded complexes I/An.
FMO energies (a.u.), polarizability, α (Bohr3), and dipole moment μ (Debye) of both conformers of the supramolecular H-bonded (SMHB) complexes I/An.
| Parameter | Syn | Anti | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I/A6 | I/A8 | I/A10 | I/A12 | I/A6 | I/A8 | I/A10 | I/A12 | |
|
| −0.12030 | −0.12035 | −0.12055 | −0.12056 | −0.12081 | −0.12080 | −0.12080 | −0.12078 |
|
| −0.22075 | −0.22073 | −0.22068 | −0.22066 | −0.21410 | −0.22135 | −0.22131 | −0.22126 |
|
| 0.10045 | 0.10038 | 0.10013 | 0.1001 | 0.09329 | 0.10055 | 0.10051 | 0.10048 |
|
| 2.6897 | 2.7634 | 2.7941 | 2.8109 | 1.9935 | 1.4576 | 2.0176 | 2.0260 |
|
| 893.01 | 941.85 | 988.48 | 1036.07 | 902.07 | 951.13 | 999.38 | 1047.24 |
Figure 4Molecular electrostatic potentials (MEP) of both conformers of the H-bonded complexes I/An.
Figure 5FT-IR spectra of I, A10, and I/A10.
Phase transition temperatures (°C), enthalpy of transitions (kJ/mol), and normalized transition entropy of supramolecular H-bonded complexes I/An.
| Compound |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 130.4 | 139.7 | 38.67 | 183.2 | 3.91 | 1.03 |
|
| 124.0 | 147.0 | 27.21 | 191.5 | 2.98 | 0.77 |
|
| 150.2 | 184.2 | 21.99 | 203.7 | 2.70 | 0.68 |
|
| 144.7 | 169.2 | 28.24 | 209.4 | 3.68 | 0.92 |
Abbreviations: SmC-I = Smectic C to isotropic liquid transition. SmC-I = Smectic C to isotropic liquid phase transition. = Normalized entropy transition.
Figure 6Graphical DSC transitions of 2:1 SMHB complexes, I/An.
Figure 7Polarizing optical microscopy (POM) smectic C (SmC) phase texture upon heating for 2:1 supramolecular complex: (a) I/A8 at 185 oC and (b) I/A12 at 197 oC.
Figure 8Comparison between present SMHB complexes I/An (●) and five-ring complexes I/Bn (○) in thermal mesophase stability.