| Literature DB >> 32244753 |
Ashim Sikdar1,2, Jinxin Wang1,3, Mirza Hasanuzzaman4, Xiaoyang Liu5, Shulin Feng5, Rana Roy1,2, Tanveer Ali Sial1,6, Altaf Hussain Lahori7, Parimala Gnana Soundari Arockiam Jeyasundar1, Xiuqing Wang5.
Abstract
A greenhouse pot trial was conducted to investigate the effect of organic amendments combined with triple superphosphate on the bioavailability of heavy metals (HMs), Amorpha fruticosa growth and metal uptake from Pb-Zn mine tailings. Cattle manure compost (CMC), spent mushroom compost (SMC) and agricultural field soil (AFS) were applied to tailings at 5%, 10%, 20% and 30% w/w ratio, whereas sewage sludge (SS) and wood biochar (WB) were mixed at 2.5%, 5%, 10% and 20% w/w ratio. Triple superphosphate (TSP) was added to all the treatments at 4:1 (molar ratio). Amendments efficiently decreased DTPA-extracted Pb, Zn, Cd and Cu in treatments. Chlorophyll contents and shoot and root dry biomass significantly (p< 0.05) increased in the treatments of CMC (except T4 for chlorophyll b) and SMC, whereas treatments of SS (except T1 for chlorophyll a and b), WB and AFS (except T4 for chlorophyll a and b) did not show positive effects as compared to CK1. Bioconcentration factor (BCF) and translocation factor (TF) values in plant tissues were below 1 for most treatments. In amended treatments, soluble protein content increased, phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) decreased, and catalase (CAT) activity showed varied results as compared to CK1 and CK2. Results suggested that A. fruticosa can be a potential metal phytostabilizer and use of CMC or SMC in combination with TSP are more effective than other combinations for the in situ stabilization of Pb-Zn mine tailings.Entities:
Keywords: Amorpha fruticosa; enzymatic antioxidants; heavy metal stabilization; organic amendments; phytoremediation efficiency; triple superphosphate
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32244753 PMCID: PMC7181007 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25071617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Effect of different amendments on pH and EC of treated and untreated tailings samples; and chlorophyll (Chl) contents and plant dry biomass (mean ± standard deviation; n = 3) of A. fruticosa grown in treated and untreated tailings samples.
| Treatment | pH | EC (dS m−1) | Chl a Content (mg g−1FW) | Chl b Content (mg g−1FW) | Shoot Dry Biomass (g pot−1) | Root Dry Biomass (g pot−1) | Total Dry Biomass (g pot−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CK1 | 6.64 ± 0.14 d–g | 1.08 ± 0.03 j | 1.70 ± 0.01 h | 0.68 ± 0.00 g | 1.80 ± 0.00 e | 0.72 ± 0.00 f | 2.52 ± 0.00 e |
| CK2 | 6.63 ± 0.25 d–h | 1.11 ± 0.04 ij | 0.98 ± 0.07 k | 0.37 ± 0.03 j | 1.78 ± 0.01 e | 0.71 ± 0.00 f | 2.49 ± 0.01 e |
| CMCT1 | 6.69 ± 0.09 c–f | 1.24 ± 0.07 h–j | 2.22 ± 0.03 f | 0.71 ± 0.00 g | 11.82 ± 0.15 a | 16.58 ± 3.44 a | 28.40 ± 3.59 a |
| CMCT2 | 6.56 ± 0.19 e–i | 1.37 ± 0.11 f–j | 2.36 ± 0.01 e | 0.76 ± 0.00 f | 12.21 ± 4.60 a | 19.32 ± 4.29 a | 31.53 ± 5.58 a |
| CMCT3 | 6.63 ± 0.05 d–h | 1.59 ± 0.17 e–g | 2.47 ± 0.01 d | 0.75 ± 0.00 f | 13.48 ± 1.43 a | 19.45 ± 1.88 a | 32.93 ± 1.45 a |
| CMCT4 | 6.62 ± 0.13 d–h | 1.79 ± 0.34 de | 1.71 ± 0.01 h | 0.57 ± 0.00 h | 5.15 ± 2.26 cd | 5.55 ± 3.99 cd | 10.70 ± 6.23 cd |
| SMCT1 | 6.85 ± 0.11 b–d | 1.08 ± 0.03 j | 3.08 ± 0.02 b | 1.13 ± 0.01 b | 5.25 ± 1.58 cd | 4.40 ± 2.25 de | 9.65 ± 3.83 d |
| SMCT2 | 6.84 ± 0.17 b–d | 1.12 ± 0.06 ij | 3.28 ± 0.03 a | 1.16 ± 0.02 a | 7.90 ± 1.88 bc | 8.43 ± 1.44 bc | 16.33 ± 3.21 bc |
| SMCT3 | 6.69 ± 0.15 c–f | 1.28 ± 0.06 g–j | 3.29 ± 0.00 a | 1.17 ± 0.00 a | 8.17 ± 3.90 b | 9.48 ± 5.38 b | 17.65 ± 9.27 b |
| SMCT4 | 7.06 ± 0.10 b | 1.41 ± 0.01 f–i | 2.91 ± 0.02 c | 0.99 ± 0.01 c | 5.22 ± 2.82 cd | 6.02 ± 4.51 b–d | 11.24 ± 7.32 cd |
| SST1 | 6.36 ± 0.15 h–j | 1.24 ± 0.02 h–j | 2.16 ± 0.02 g | 0.83 ± 0.01 e | 1.87 ± 0.00 e | 0.74 ± 0.00 ef | 2.61 ± 0.00 e |
| SST2 | 6.39 ± 0.21 g–j | 1.52 ± 0.07 e–h | 1.26 ± 0.02 i | 0.47 ± 0.00 i | 1.85 ± 0.00 e | 0.73 ± 0.00 f | 2.58 ± 0.00 e |
| SST3 | 6.44 ± 0.10 f–j | 1.98 ± 0.12 d | 1.03 ± 0.01 j | 0.30 ± 0.01 k | 1.80 ± 0.00 e | 0.72 ± 0.00 f | 2.52 ± 0.00 e |
| SST4 | 6.25 ± 0.13 j | 2.31 ± 0.05 c | 0.63 ± 0.02 m | 0.20 ± 0.06 l | 1.75 ± 0.00 e | 0.71 ± 0.00 f | 2.46 ± 0.00 e |
| WBT1 | 6.32 ± 0.20 ij | 1.61 ± 0.25 ef | 0.39 ± 0.00 n | 0.13 ± 0.00 no | 2.52 ± 0.00 de | 0.85 ± 0.00 ef | 3.37 ± 0.00 e |
| WBT2 | 6.49 ± 0.19 f-j | 1.92 ± 0.15 d | 0.17 ± 0.05 o | 0.17 ± 0.01 m | 1.80 ± 0.00 e | 0.78 ± 0.00 ef | 2.57 ± 0.00 e |
| WBT3 | 6.92 ± 0.14 bc | 3.56 ± 0.67 b | 0.10 ± 0.00 o | 0.10 ± 0.01 o | 1.76 ± 0.00 e | 0.75 ± 0.00 ef | 2.51 ± 0.00 e |
| WBT4 | 7.35 ± 0.11 a | 4.65 ± 0.26 a | - | - | - | - | - |
| AFST1 | 6.68 ± 0.21 c–f | 1.18 ± 0.06 ij | 0.38 ± 0.02 n | 0.14 ± 0.01 n | 1.87 ± 0.01 e | 0.80 ± 0.00 ef | 2.67 ± 0.01 e |
| AFST2 | 6.59 ± 0.16 d–i | 1.19 ± 0.01 ij | 0.74 ± 0.01 l | 0.28 ± 0.00 k | 2.22 ± 0.30 e | 0.86 ± 0.04 ef | 3.09 ± 0.34 e |
| AFST3 | 6.44 ± 0.00 f–j | 1.19 ± 0.01 ij | 1.02 ± 0.01 j | 0.39 ± 0.00 j | 2.54 ± 0.15 de | 0.89 ± 0.02 ef | 3.44 ± 0.15 e |
| AFST4 | 6.83 ± 0.06 b–e | 1.20 ± 0.01 ij | 2.23 ± 0.02 f | 0.86 ± 0.01 d | 2.58 ± 0.13 de | 0.91 ± 0.00 ef | 3.50 ± 0.13 e |
Means followed by the different letter(s) within each column are significantly different at p < 0.05 according to LSD test. CK1: Control 1; CK2: Control 2; CMC: Cattle manure compost; SMC: Spent mushroom compost; SS: Sewage sludge; WB: Wood biochar; AFS: Agricultural field soil; Chl: Chlorophyll; EC: Electrical conductivity. Plant did not grow in WBT4.
Figure 1Effect of amendments on DTPA-extractable Pb (a), Zn (b), Cd (c) and Cu (d) in treated tailings. CK1= Only tailings and CK2= Tailings plus TSP. The amendment treatments are denoted as T1, T2, T3 and T4. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). Letters above the bars refer to the difference at significance level (p < 0.05, LSD) among different treatments. CK1: Control 1; CK2: Control 2; CMC: Cattle manure compost; SMC: Spent mushroom compost; SS: Sewage sludge; WB: Wood biochar; AFS: Agricultural field soil; DTPA: Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (for interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).
Figure 2Effect of amendments on concentrations of Pb (a), Zn (b), Cd (c) and Cu (d) in A. fruticosa tissues grown in treated tailings. Letters above the bars refer to the difference at significance level (p < 0.05, LSD) among different treatments. CK1: Control 1; CK2: Control 2; CMC: Cattle manure compost; SMC: Spent mushroom compost; SS: Sewage sludge; WB: Wood biochar; AFS: Agricultural field soil. Plant did not grow in WBT4.
Figure 3Bioconcentration factors and translocation factors of Pb, Zn, Cd and Cu in A. fruticosa tissues grown in treated and untreated tailings. CK1 = Only tailings and CK2 = Tailings plus TSP. The amendment treatments are denoted as T1, T2, T3 and T4. CK1: Control 1; CK2: Control 2; CMC: Cattle manure compost; SMC: Spent mushroom compost; SS: Sewage sludge; WB: Wood biochar; AFS: Agricultural field soil; BCF: Bioconcentration factor; TF: Translocation factor; L: Leaf; S: Stem; R: Root. Plant did not grow in WBT4. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).
Figure 4Effect of amendments on CAT (a), PAL (b), PPO (c) activities and soluble protein content (d) of A. fruticosa leaf. The amendment treatments are denoted as T1, T2, T3 and T4. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean (n = 3). Letters above the bars refer to the difference at significance level (p < 0.05, LSD) among different treatments. CK1: Control 1; CK2: Control 2; CMC: Cattle manure compost; SMC: Spent mushroom compost; SS: Sewage sludge; WB: Wood biochar; AFS: Agricultural field soil. Plant did not grow in WBT4.
Figure 5Pearson’s correlation test among tailings’ physicochemical properties, A. fruticosa growth, tissue metal concentrations and antioxidant enzyme activitiesafter harvesting.CK1: Control 1; CK2: Control 2; CMC: Cattle manure compost; SMC: Spent mushroom compost; SS: Sewage sludge; WB: Wood biochar; AFS: Agricultural field soil; EC: Electrical conductivity; DTPA: Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid; Chl: Chlorophyll; RDB: Root dry biomass; SDB: Shoot dry biomass; TDB: Total dry biomass; CAT: Catalase; PAL: Phenylalanine ammonialyase; PPO: Polyphenol oxidase; SP: Soluble protein(for interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article).
Basic physicochemical properties of the studied Pb-Zn mine tailings and amendments (mean ± standard deviation; n = 3).
| Parameters | Tailings | AFS | CMC | SMC | SS | WB | TSP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH (1:5 H2O) | 7.33 ± 0.07 | 7.85 ± 0.07 | 7.75 ± 0.04 | 7.36 ± 0.04 | 5.44 ± 0.02 | 10.50 ± 0.03 | 2.52 ± 0.01 |
| EC (1:5) (dS m−1) | 1.27 ± 0.01 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 5.84 ± 0.01 | 5.87 ± 0.08 | 2.41 ± 0.02 | 26 ± 0.4 | 7.54 ± 0.1 |
| Clay% | 11.5 | 36.96 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Silt% | 21.7 | 53.45 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Sand% | 66.8 | 9.59 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Textural class | Sandy loam | Silty clay loam | - | - | - | - | - |
| CEC (cmol kg−1) | 10.53 ± 0.2 | 33.94 ± 0.9 | 62.41 ± 0.8 | 269 ± 0.7 | 72.60 ± 0.6 | 143 ± 0.3 | 127 ± 0.9 |
| Water holding capacity (%) | 15.36 ± 0.4 | 23.40 ± 0.2 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Moisture content (%) | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 0.92 ± 0.09 | 7.27 ± 0.2 | 8.6 ± 0.4 | 8.82 ± 0.1 | 12.46 ± 0.5 | - |
| C% | 4.40 ± 0.0 | 1.30 ± 0.0 | 30.49 ± 0.0 | 25.31 ± 0.0 | 32.28 ± 0.1 | 41.50 ± 0.1 | - |
| Total N (g kg−1) | 0.44 ± 0.0 | 0.33 ± 0.0 | 13.04 ± 0.1 | 11.44 ± 0.1 | 21.30 ± 0.1 | 9.50 ± 0.0 | - |
| Total P (g kg−1) | 0.20 ± 0.0 | 5.62 ± 0.0 | 8.75 ± 0.0 | 1.54 ± 0.0 | 2.19 ± 0.0 | 3.88 ± 0.0 | - |
| Total K (g kg−1) | 8.49 ± 0.0 | 10.87 ± 0.0 | 11.29 ± 0.0 | 8.58 ± 0.0 | 12.31 ± 0.0 | 82.50 ± 0.0 | - |
| Available N (mg kg−1) | 3.77 ± 0.1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Available P (mg kg−1) | 6.69 ± 0.1 | 9.04 ± 0.1 | 351 ± 1.0 | 154 ± 0.1 | 529 ± 0.7 | 146 ± 0.8 | - |
| Available K (mg kg−1) | 3.98 ± 0.1 | 26.51 ± 0.1 | 197 ± 0.4 | 86.23 ± 0. | 498 ± 0.2 | 1051 ± 0.4 | - |
| Total Pb (mg kg−1) | 5614 ± 51 | 62.65 ± 5.9 | 21.42 ± 9.7 | 60.06 ± 3.6 | 38.34 ± 4.3 | 69.31 ± 2.9 | - |
| Total Zn (mg kg−1) | 15439 ± 114 | 109 ± 2.9 | 263 ± 2.4 | 90.84 ± 6.6 | 411 ± 7.1 | 64.35 ± 3.2 | - |
| Total Cd (mg kg−1) | 63.58 ± 1.1 | 2.73 ± 0.2 | 1.87 ± 0.2 | 4.00 ± 0.1 | 1.54 ± 0.1 | 4.57 ± 0.5 | - |
| Total Cu (mg kg−1) | 425 ± 2.9 | 19.67 ± 1.1 | 37.40 ± 0.3 | 14.93 ± 0.5 | 51.46 ± 0.7 | 25.49 ± 0.5 | - |
| Total Ni (mg kg−1) | 8.54 ± 1.2 | 22.49 ± 0.5 | 2.41 ± 0.1 | 1.14 ± 0.1 | 13.48 ± 1.9 | 3.82 ± 0.2 | - |
| Total Cr (mg kg−1) | 8.46 ± 0.4 | 20.35 ± 2.9 | 0.96 ± 0.1 | 7.58 ± 1.4 | 65.30 ± 4.8 | 39.88 ± 1.9 | - |
| Total Ca (mg kg−1) | 94,391 ± 2920 | 25,631 ± 773 | 19,146 ± 765 | 81,112 ± 1394 | 13,246 ± 680 | 54,197 ±1579 | - |
| Total Mg (mg kg−1) | 9051 ± 365 | 7354 ± 206 | 7286 ± 309 | 4761 ± 293 | 4127 ± 46.2 | 8340 ± 336 | - |
| Total Fe (mg kg−1) | 41,624 ± 387 | 25,628 ± 610 | 5488 ± 192 | 4920 ± 55.2 | 8935 ± 26.2 | 9544 ± 321 | - |
| Total Na (mg kg−1) | 305 ± 14.8 | 437 ± 41.6 | 2603 ± 122 | 617 ± 10.3 | 1411 ± 60.8 | 416 ± 18.6 | - |
| Total Mn (mg kg−1) | 1532 ± 30.5 | 630 ± 25.5 | 230 ± 11 | 216 ± 8.2 | 141.80 ± 3.8 | 414 ± 18.0 | - |
| DTPA Pb (mg kg−1) | 296 ± 4.5 | 9.14 ± 0.2 | 11.58 ± 0.4 | 6.29 ± 0.7 | 9.85 ± 0.2 | 13.39 ± 0.3 | - |
| DTPA Zn (mg kg−1) | 1325 ± 3.6 | 4.86 ± 0.2 | 95 ± 2.6 | 5.46 ± 0.3 | 24.12 ± 0.1 | 1.80 ± 0.2 | - |
| DTPA Cd (mg kg−1) | 9.17 ± 0.04 | 0.15 ± 0.0 | 0.17 ± 0.0 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | - |
| DTPA Cu (mg kg−1) | 126 ± 4.7 | 1.14 ± 0.03 | 5.82 ± 0.5 | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 3.81 ± 0.3 | 1.15 ± 0.1 | - |
Values indicate mean of one sample with three replications. AFS: Agricultural field soil; CMC: Cattle manure compost; SMC: Spent mushroom compost; SS: Sewage sludge; WB: Wood biochar; TSP: Triple superphosphate; EC: Electric conductivity; CEC: Cation exchange capacity; (-): Not measured.