| Literature DB >> 26337551 |
Junren Chen1, Mohammad Shafi2, Song Li1, Ying Wang1, Jiasen Wu1, Zhengqian Ye1, Danli Peng1, Wenbo Yan1, Dan Liu1.
Abstract
Moso bamboo is recognized as phytoremediation plant due to production of huge biomass and high tolerance in stressed environment. Hydroponics and pot experiments were conducted to investigate mechanism of copper tolerance and to evaluate copper accumulation capacity of Moso bamboo. In hydroponics experiment there was non significant variation in MDA contents of leaves compared with control. SOD and POD initially indicated enhancing trend with application of 5 μM Cu and then decreased consistently with application of 25 and 100 μM Cu. Application of each additional increment of copper have constantly enhanced proline contents while maximum increase of proline was observed with application of 100 μM copper. In pot experiment chlorophyll and biomass initially showed increasing tendency and decreased gradually with application of each additional increment of Cu. Normal growth of Moso bamboo was observed with application of 100 mg kg(-1) copper. However, additional application of 300 or 600 mg kg(-1) copper had significantly inhibited growth of Moso bamboo. The concentration of Cu in Moso bamboo has attained the levels of 340, 60, 23 mg kg(-1) in roots, stems and leaves respectively. The vacuoles were the main organs which accumulated copper and reduced toxicity of copper as studied by TEM-DEX technology.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26337551 PMCID: PMC4559668 DOI: 10.1038/srep13554
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Cu concentration in tissues of some Cu-tolerant and Cu-hyperaccumulators.
| Biomass(dry weight) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2432 | – | 201 | – | 346 | 27 g plant−1 | ||
| 11138 | – | 596 | 80 | 122 | 7 t ha−1 | ||
| 13077 | – | 512 | 584 | 3768 | 7 t ha−1 | ||
| 14170 | – | 154 | 79 | 987 | 8 t ha−1 | ||
| 1200 | 9.7 | – | – | 1751 | 4.5 t ha−1 | ||
| 142 | 52 | – | – | 475 | 3 t ha−1 | ||
| 1927 | – | 551 | 394 | 2346 | 2.5 t ha−1 | ||
| 1494 | – | 133 | 110 | 491 | 15 g plant−1 | ||
| 2105 | – | 45 | 42 | 33 | 53 g plant−1 | ||
Biomass and chlorophyll of Moso bamboo as affected by copper stress in pots for two months.
| Cuconcentration(mg kg−1) | Roots DM(g plant−1) | Stem DM(g plant−1) | Leaves DM(g plant−1) | Chl-a(mg g−1) | Chl-b(mg g−1) | Chl-a + Chl-b(mg g−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0.83 ± 0.08b | 0.36 ± 0.03a | 2.20 ± 0.29ab | 1.63 ± 0.03ab | 0.45 ± 0.03a | 2.07 ± 0.06a | 3.64 ± 0.15a |
| 50 | 1.00 ± 0.05a | 0.37 ± 0.03a | 2.63 ± 0.28a | 1.82 ± 0.09a | 0.38 ± 0.07a | 2.19 ± 0.11a | 4.91 ± 0.97a |
| 100 | 0.77 ± 0.08b | 0.33 ± 0.06a | 2.13 ± 0.34b | 1.54 ± 0.14b | 0.43 ± 0.06a | 1.97 ± 0.18a | 3.56 ± 0.40a |
| 300 | 0.26 ± 0.04c | 0.15 ± 0.03b | 0.33 ± 0.03c | 0.76 ± 0.16c | 0.20 ± 0.04b | 0.96 ± 0.19b | 3.75 ± 0.38a |
| 600 | 0.16 ± 0.03c | 0.10 ± 0.01b | 0.17 ± 0.09c | 0.35 ± 0.04d | 0.04 ± 0.01c | 0.40 ± 0.06c | 8.31 ± 1.9b |
Data points and error bars represent mean ± S.D. of three replicates (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).
Copper concentrations in roots, stems, leaves, bioaccumulation factor (BAF) and translocation factor (TF) of copper uptake in Moso bamboo for 2 months in pots.
| Cu conc.(mg kg−1) | Roots(mg kg−1) | Stems(mg kg−1) | Leaves(mg kg−1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 7 ± 2.8d | 5 ± 0.5e | 5.4 ± 0.2d | – | – | – | – | – |
| 50 | 60 ± 6c | 14 ± 1.5d | 9 ± 1c | 0.78 | 0.18 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.15 |
| 100 | 178 ± 28b | 33 ± 3c | 16 ± 1.4b | 1.41 | 0.26 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.09 |
| 300 | 207 ± 32b | 46 ± 3b | 21 ± 3a | 0.63 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.22 | 0.10 |
| 600 | 340 ± 21a | 60 ± 7a | 23 ± 4a | 0.54 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.07 |
Data points and error bars represent mean ± S.D. of three replicates (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).
Activity of SOD, POD, MDA contents and proline of Moso bamboo for 15 days copper stress in hydroponics.
| Cuconc.(μM) | Roots(mg kg−1) | Stem(mg kg−1) | Leaves(mg kg−1) | MDA contents(μM g−1 FW) | Proline contents(μg g−1 FW) | POD activity(U mg−1 FW) | SOD activity(U g−1 FW) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 8.4 ± 0.8d | 4.4 ± 1.2d | 3.5 ± 0.6c | 0.0224 ± 0.0021a | 14.4 ± 0.7b | 38 ± 2ab | 161 ± 12ab |
| 5 | 165 ± 23c | 12 ± 2.9c | 8.3 ± 2.5bc | 0.0236 ± 0.003a | 16.0 ± 2.2b | 43 ± 4a | 192 ± 12a |
| 25 | 344 ± 29b | 29 ± 6b | 14 ± 2.3b | 0.233 ± 0.0023a | 16.3 ± 3.5b | 35 ± 5b | 168 ± 23ab |
| 100 | 417 ± 57a | 45 ± 10a | 24 ± 5a | 0.0269 ± 0.0032a | 33.6 ± 8.1a | 36 ± 2b | 156 ± 22b |
Data points and error bars represent mean ± S.D. of three replicates (n = 3). Different letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).
Figure 1TEM micrographs from stem of Moso bamboo and EDX-specturm of cell wall (1) vacuole (2) and cytoplasm (3).