| Literature DB >> 32244618 |
Tracy B Høeg1,2,3, Kenneth Chmiel4, Alexandra E Warrick1, Sandra L Taylor5, Robert H Weiss4,6.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify plasma metabolites associated with superior endurance running performance. In 2016, participants at the Western States Endurance Run (WSER), a 100-mile (161-km) foot race, underwent non-targeted metabolomic testing of their post-race plasma. Metabolites associated with faster finish times were identified. Based on these results, runners at the 2017 WSER underwent targeted metabolomics testing, including lipidomics and choline levels. The 2017 participants' plasma metabolites were correlated with finish times and compared with non-athletic controls. In 2016, 427 known molecules were detected using non-targeted metabolomics. Four compounds, all phosphatidylcholines (PCs) were associated with finish time (False Discovery Rate (FDR) < 0.05). All were higher in faster finishers. In 2017, using targeted PC analysis, multiple PCs, measured pre- and post-race, were higher in faster finishers (FDR < 0.05). The majority of PCs was noted to be higher in runners (both pre- and post-race) than in controls (FDR < 0.05). Runners had higher choline levels pre-race compared to controls (p < 0.0001), but choline level did not differ significantly from controls post-race (p = 0.129). Choline levels decreased between the start and the finish of the race (p < 0.0001). Faster finishers had lower choline levels than slower finishers at the race finish (p = 0.028).Entities:
Keywords: endurance; exercise; performance; physiology; running; ultramarathon
Year: 2020 PMID: 32244618 PMCID: PMC7240692 DOI: 10.3390/sports8040044
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sports (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4663
Figure 1Participation and analyses performed in Phases I and II of the study.
Figure 2Individual post-race metabolite levels according to 161-km race finish time. Dark blue = higher in faster finishers (FDR < 0.05). Light blue = non-significantly higher in faster finishers. Pink = non-significantly lower in faster runners. Node size reflects the magnitude of the correlation using the correlation coefficient. Linear distances between objects are calculated using the Tanimoto or KEGG coefficients (tests of structural similarity).
Figure 3Individual pre- and post-race PC levels according to 161-km race finish time. Bright blue = higher in faster finishers (FDR < 0.05). Light blue = non-significantly higher in faster finishers. Pink = non-significantly lower in faster runners. Node size reflects the magnitude of correlation using correlation coefficient. Linear distances between objects are calculated using the Tanimoto or KEGG coefficients (tests of structural similarity).
Figure 4Individual pre- and post-race PC levels in runners compared with non-athletic controls. Bright blue = higher in runners than controls (FDR < 0.05). Red = lower in runners than controls (FDR < 0.05). Light blue = non-significantly higher in runners. Pink = non-significantly lower in runners. Node size reflects the magnitude of the correlation using the correlation coefficient. Linear distances between objects are calculated using the Tanimoto or KEGG coefficients (tests of structural similarity).