| Literature DB >> 32244614 |
Iñigo San-Millán1,2, John C Hill3, Julio Calleja-González4.
Abstract
Skeletal muscle glycogen (SMG) stores in highly glycolytic activities regulate muscle contraction by controlling calcium release and uptake from sarcoplasmic reticulum, which could affect muscle contraction. Historically, the assessment of SMG was performed through invasive and non-practical muscle biopsies. In this study we have utilized a novel methodology to assess SMG through a non-invasive high-frequency ultrasound. Nine MLS professional soccer players (180.4 ± 5.9 cm; 72.4 ± 9.3 kg; 10.4% ± 0.7% body fat) participated. All followed the nutritional protocol 24 h before the official match as well as performing the same practice program the entire week leading to the match. The SMG decreased from 80 ± 8.6 to 63.9 ± 10.2; p = 0.005 on MuscleSound® score (0-100) representing a 20% ± 10.4% decrease in muscle glycogen after match. Inter-individual differences in both starting glycogen content (65-90) and in percentage decrease in glycogen after the match (between 6.2% and 44.5%). Some players may not start the match with adequate SMG while others' SMG decreased significantly throughout the game. Adequate pre-match SMG should be achieved during half-time and game-play in order to mitigate the decrease in glycogen. Further and more ample studies are needed before the application of this technology.Entities:
Keywords: MuscleSound; match; muscle glycogen; soccer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32244614 PMCID: PMC7231208 DOI: 10.3390/nu12040971
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Nutritional and carbohydrate protocol followed before the game and at half-time.
|
|
No carbohydrate (CHO) consumption was allowed after the game until the ultrasound scan was completed.
Figure 1Muscle scan of rectus femoris (RF) being captured, followed by MuscleSound® cropping and staining based on echogenicity of the muscle, resulting in a score measured by MuscleSound® software, according to Hill and San-Millan [9].
Individual pre- and post-match rectus femoris glycogen content of each player and the position of each player.
| Player | MuscleSound | MuscleSound | % Decrease | Effect Size | Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| η2p | |||||
| Player 1 | 80 | 75 | 6.2 | Goal Keeper | |
| Player 2 | 90 | 75 | 16.7 | Defense | |
| Player 3 | 80 | 75 | 6.2 | Defense Center | |
| Player 9 | 80 | 70 | 12.5 | Defense | |
| Player 5 | 90 | 50 | 44.5 | Midfielder | |
| Player 6 | 65 | 50 | 23.1 | Midfielder | |
| Player 7 | 90 | 70 | 22.2 | Midfielder | |
| Player 8 | 80 | 60 | 25 | Forward | |
| Player 9 | 65 | 50 | 23.1 | Forward | |
| Team Average | 80 ± 8.6 | 63.9 ± 10.19 | 20 ± 10.4 | 1 |
Two players showed up to the game with a score of 60 which was 25% lower than the average of the team (80). Furthermore, these two players also showed the lowest post-match glycogen levels (Table 2). It is also worth noting that all players received at half-time 65 g of CHO (40 g within a drink and 25 g in a sports gel form).
Figure 2Individual pre- and post-match rectus femoris glycogen content of each player and the position of each player.