Yinghao Cao1, Xiaoling Liu2, Lijuan Xiong3, Kailin Cai1. 1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. 2. Department of Endocrinology, Liyuan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Since and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. 3. Department of Nosocomial Infection Management, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently, the epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has begun to spread worldwide. We aim to explore reliable evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of the COVID-19 by analyzing all the published studies by Chinese scholars on the clinical and imaging features in novel coronavirus pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We searched five medical databases including two Chinese and three English databases for all published articles on COVID-19 since the outbreak. A random-effects model was designed, and the imaging and clinical data from all studies were collected for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 31 articles and 46 959 patients were included, including 10 English articles and 21 Chinese articles. The results of meta-analysis showed that the most common clinical manifestations were fever (87.3%; 0.838-0.909), cough (58.1%; 0.502-0.660), dyspnea (38.3%; 0.246-0.520), muscle soreness or fatigue (35.5%; 0.253-0.456), and chest distress (31.2%; -0.024 to 0.648). The main imaging findings were bilateral pneumonia (75.7%; 0.639-0.871) and ground-glass opacification (69.9%; 0.602-0.796). Among the patients, the incidence that required intensive care unit (ICU) was (29.3%; 0.190-0.395), the incidence with acute respiratory distress syndrome was (28.8%; 0.147-0.429), the incidence with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome was (8.5%; -0.008 to 0.179), and the case fatality rate of patients with COVID-19 was (6.8%; 0.044-0.093). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 is a new clinical infectious disease that mainly causes bilateral pneumonia and lung function deteriorates rapidly. Nearly a third of patients need to be admitted to the ICU, and patients are likely to present respiratory failure or even death.
BACKGROUND: Currently, the epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has begun to spread worldwide. We aim to explore reliable evidence for the diagnosis and treatment of the COVID-19 by analyzing all the published studies by Chinese scholars on the clinical and imaging features in novel coronavirus pneumonia caused by SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: We searched five medical databases including two Chinese and three English databases for all published articles on COVID-19 since the outbreak. A random-effects model was designed, and the imaging and clinical data from all studies were collected for meta-analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 31 articles and 46 959 patients were included, including 10 English articles and 21 Chinese articles. The results of meta-analysis showed that the most common clinical manifestations were fever (87.3%; 0.838-0.909), cough (58.1%; 0.502-0.660), dyspnea (38.3%; 0.246-0.520), muscle soreness or fatigue (35.5%; 0.253-0.456), and chest distress (31.2%; -0.024 to 0.648). The main imaging findings were bilateral pneumonia (75.7%; 0.639-0.871) and ground-glass opacification (69.9%; 0.602-0.796). Among the patients, the incidence that required intensive care unit (ICU) was (29.3%; 0.190-0.395), the incidence with acute respiratory distress syndrome was (28.8%; 0.147-0.429), the incidence with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome was (8.5%; -0.008 to 0.179), and the case fatality rate of patients with COVID-19 was (6.8%; 0.044-0.093). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 is a new clinical infectious disease that mainly causes bilateral pneumonia and lung function deteriorates rapidly. Nearly a third of patients need to be admitted to the ICU, and patients are likely to present respiratory failure or even death.
The 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP) initially broke out in China, especially in Hubei province. The NCP is caused by a new coronavirus (SARS‐COV‐2) of the Sarbe virus subgenus, a member of orthocoronavirus subfamily.
SARS‐COV‐2 is a member of the coronavirus family along with SARS‐CoV and MERS‐CoV. With the deepening of research, more and more evidence show that its transmission channels are diversified, and its transmission speed and infectivity are stronger than SARS‐CoV and MERS‐CoV.
,
,
Since the outbreak of the epidemic, China has taken active prevention and control measures and achieved good results, but, recently, the epidemic situation abroad has begun to develop into an uncontrollable situation. As of 28 February 2020, the epidemic of NCP has affected six continents, and the epidemic situation in South Korea, Italy, Japan, and other countries is extremely serious. On 29 February, the “China‐WHO NCP (COVID‐19) Joint Inspection Report” stated that the NCP is almost susceptible to everyone on the same day. On 11 March, the WHO declared the SARS‐CoV‐2 outbreak as pandemic. Currently, published studies and case reports indicate that patients with NCP have very different clinical manifestations, laboratory tests, and imaging tests, making clinical diagnosis and treatment limited. Therefore, it is urgent to improve the understanding of the clinical characteristics of patients with NCP to further guide clinical and scientific research through evidence‐based medicine.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Search strategy and study selection
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. The literature search was performed according to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses) process. The search was conducted in five popular medical databases including three English databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase) and two Chinese databases (National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI] and China Biology Medicine disc [CBMdisc]). The searches were concluded by 1 March 2020. The language limit is English and Chinese. The retrieval is a combination of subject words and free words, and the keywords are as follows: “2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia,” “COVID‐19,” “Coronavirus,” “SARS‐CoV‐2,” “Wuhan Coronavirus,” “clinical features,” “2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia,” and “imaging features.”
Inclusion/exclusion criteria
Inclusive criteria are as follows: (a) research types: cross‐sectional studies and case series; (b) research subjects: patients with confirmed NCP, including patients with clinical diagnosis; and (c) data items: including clinical characteristics, biochemical indicators, and imaging signs. Exclusive criteria are as follows: (a) the type of study is case report, review, and so forth; (b) repeated research; and (c) lack of the above case data.
Data extraction and paper quality evaluation
The titles and abstracts of all retrieved references were independently reviewed by two investigators, and if there was any ambiguity in the search process, the decision was made by a third investigator. (a) The basic characteristics of the included literature are as follows: author, publication date, journal, research type, number of patients, quality score, and so forth. (b) The basic characteristics of the research subjects are as follows: age, sex, comorbidities, clinical manifestations, laboratory test results, imaging manifestations, and so on. The quality of all included literature was assessed using the Institute of Health Economics (IHE) scale.
Statistical analysis
The statistical software Stata version 14.0 and Open Meta‐Analyst were used for meta‐analysis of single‐arm studies. We first unified all units of variables and, then, expressed classified variables as percentages and expressed continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation. The combined prevalence and 95% CI were calculated using a random‐effects model. We performed the Egger test to assess publication bias in all literature works, and P < .05 was considered as publication bias.
RESULTS
Literature inclusion and characteristics
A total of 956 articles were retrieved. After deleting duplicates, 96 studies remained, of which 860 were excluded based on the title or abstract. Finally, 65 were eliminated after reading the full text, and a total of 31 articles
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and 46 959 patients were included in this meta‐analysis (Figure 1). The main characteristics of the included studies are shown in Table 1. Publication bias was assessed with a funnel plot for the standard error by logit event, with no evidence of bias. Additionally, the Egger test (P = .091) suggested that there was no notable evidence of publication bias.
Figure 1
Diagram of documents retrieval
Table 1
The characteristics of the included literature
References
Journal
Year
Date (M/D)
Country
No. patient
Sex (male)
Average age
Research type
Quality
Huang et al6
Lancet
2020
01/24
China
41
30
49
Retrospective study
8
Chen et al7
Lancet
2020
01/30
China
99
67
55.5
Retrospective study
8
Yu et al35
J Pract Med
2020
01/31
China
40
22
45.9
Retrospective study
5
Michael et al8
Radiology
2020
02/04
China
21
13
51
Retrospective study
5
Wang et al9
JAMA
2020
02/07
China
138
75
56
Retrospective study
8
Liu et al10
Chin J Pediatr
2020
02/07
China
137
61
57
Retrospective study
5
Chang et al11
JAMA
2020
02/07
China
13
10
34
Retrospective study
6
Zheng et al12
Shanghai Med J
2020
02/10
China
70
…
Retrospective study
4
Liu et al13
Sci China Life Sci
2020
02/12
China
12
8
…
Retrospective study
6
Gao et al14
J Xi'an Jiaotong Univ (Med Sci)
2020
02/13
China
10
6
41.8
Retrospective study
5
Gong et al15
Radiol Prac
2020
02/13
China
33
13
51
Retrospective study
5
Pan et al16
Eur Radiol
2020
02/13
China
63
33
…
Retrospective study
6
Liu et al17
Preprint Lancet
2020
02/13
China
24
8
43
Retrospective study
6
Pan et al18
Radiology
2020
02/13
China
21
6
40.9
Retrospective study
5
Zhang et al19
Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis
2020
02/15
China
9
5
36
Case series
5
Feng et al20
Chin J Pediatr
2020
02/17
China
15
5
…
Case series
5
Wang et al21
Chin J Pediatr
2020
02/17
China
34
14
8
Retrospective study
5
Zhang et al22
J. Chin Epi
2020
02/17
China
44 672
22 981
…
Retrospective study
6
Liu et al23
Radiol Prac
2020
02/18
China
41
32
48.45
Retrospective study
5
Zhuang et al24
Chin J Nosocomiology
2020
02/19
China
26
18
…
Retrospective study
6
Wang et al25
J Clin Med
2020
02/19
China
30
16
…
Retrospective study
5
Chen et al26
Herald Med
2020
02/19
China
54
27
58.5
Retrospective study
5
Zhong et al27
Med J Wuhan Univ
2020
02/19
China
30
18
50.17
Retrospective study
5
Fu et al28
Med J Wenzhou Univ
2020
02/20
China
35
21
47
Retrospective study
5
Yang et al29
Lancet Respir Med
2020
02/21
China
52
35
59.7
Retrospective study
7
Ji et al30
Chin J Med Imaging Technol
2020
02/24
China
45
27
45.4
Retrospective study
6
Chen et al36
Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis
2020
02/25
China
29
21
56
Retrospective study
5
Chen et al31
J Clin Med
2020
02/26
China
12
8
63
Retrospective study
4
Zeng et al32
J Emerg Tradit Chin Med
2020
02/27
China
18
10
45.94
Retrospective study
5
Cao et al33
Med J Wuhan Univ
2020
02/28
China
36
20
72.45
Retrospective study
5
Guan et al34
NEJM
2020
02/29
China
1099
640
47
Retrospective study
8
Diagram of documents retrievalThe characteristics of the included literature
Meta‐analysis results
Demographical characteristics and comorbidities
The mean age of the patients with SARS‐COV‐2 infection was 46.62 (95% CI, 31.710‐61.531) and 55.6% (95% CI, 0.530‐0.602) were male. About 35.6% (0.267‐0.444) of patients had comorbidities, including 18.3% (0.130‐0.236) with hypertension, 11.2% (0.078‐0.145) with cardiovascular disease, 10.3% (0.069‐0.136) with diabetes, 3.9% (0.011‐0.067) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 3.0% (0.021‐0.039) with chronic hepatonephropathy, and 1.1% (0.003‐0.020) with tumor (Table 2 and Figures 2 and 3).
Table 2
Meta‐analysis results of the incidence of demographical and comorbidities
Variable
Na
Estimate
95% CI
Nb
Standard error
P
T2
Q
Pc
I2
Sex, male
30
0.556
0.530 to 0.602
24 250
0.018
<.001
0.004
104.391
<.001
72.22
Age, mean
14
46.62
31.71 to 61.531
334
7.608
<.001
801.948
2756.956
<.001
99.528
ICU
9
0.293
0.190 to 0.395
2371
0.052
<.001
0.022
487.408
<.001
98.359
Comorbidities
10
0.356
0.267 to 0.444
464
0.045
<.001
0.015
75.378
<.001
88.06
Tumor
8
0.011
0.003 to 0.020
135
0.004
.009
0.000
22.143
.002
68.387
Diabetes
13
0.103
0.069 to 0.136
1261
0.017
<.001
0.002
97.488
<.001
87.691
Hypertension
12
0.183
0.130 to 0.236
2964
0.027
<.001
0.006
160.717
<.001
93.156
Cardiovascular disease
11
0.112
0.078 to 0.145
1023
0.017
<.001
0.002
136.694
<.001
92.684
Phthisis
3
0.021
−0.005 to 0.047
515
0.013
.120
0.000
2.655
.265
24.672
COPD
8
0.039
0.011 to 0.067
46
0.014
.006
0.001
53.971
<.001
87.03
Chronic hepatonephropathy
7
0.030
0.021 to 0.039
46
0.005
<.001
0.000
5.144
.525
0
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ICU, intensive care unit.
Number of studies.
Number of patients.
Heterogeneity P value.
Figure 2
The forest plots of age and sex. A, age and (B) sex
Figure 3
The forest plots of the incidence of comorbidities and intensive care unit (ICU). A, Comorbidities; (B) tumor; (C) diabetes; (D) hypertension; (E) cardiovascular disease; (F) phthisis; (G) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; (H) chronic hepatonephropathy; (I) ICU
Meta‐analysis results of the incidence of demographical and comorbiditiesAbbreviations: CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ICU, intensive care unit.Number of studies.Number of patients.Heterogeneity P value.The forest plots of age and sex. A, age and (B) sexThe forest plots of the incidence of comorbidities and intensive care unit (ICU). A, Comorbidities; (B) tumor; (C) diabetes; (D) hypertension; (E) cardiovascular disease; (F) phthisis; (G) chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; (H) chronic hepatonephropathy; (I) ICU
Clinical features
The incidence of fever was 87.3% (0.838‐0.909), that of cough was 58.1% (0.502‐0.660), that of sore throat was 12% (0.062‐0.177), that of expectoration was 29.4% (0.171‐0.417), that of chest distress was 31.2% (−0.024 to 0.648), that of muscle soreness or fatigue was 35.5% (0.253‐0.456), that of headache was 9.4% (0.063‐0.126), that of diarrhea was 6.8% (0.044‐0.092), and that of dyspnea was 38.3% (0.246‐0.520) (Table 3 and Figure 4).
Table 3
Meta‐analysis results of the incidence of clinical manifestations
Variable
Na
Estimate
95% CI
Nb
Standard error
P
T2
Q
Pc
I2
Fever
27
0.873
0.838 to 0.909
1842
0.018
<.001
0.006
177.086
<.001
85.318
Cough
27
0.581
0.502 to 0.660
1354
0.040
<.001
0.037
332.025
<.001
92.169
Sore throat
9
0.120
0.062 to 0.177
200
0.029
<.001
0.005
58.432
<.001
86.309
Expectoration
10
0.294
0.171 to 0.417
466
0.063
<.001
0.035
266.04
<.001
96.617
Chest distress
5
0.312
−0.024 to 0.648
38
0.172
.069
0.144
204.480
<.001
98.044
Muscle soreness or fatigue
18
0.355
0.253 to 0.456
781
0.052
<.001
0.038
220.594
<.001
92.747
Headache
14
0.094
0.063 to 0.126
214
0.016
<.001
0.002
37.648
<.001
65.47
Diarrhea
15
0.068
0.044 to 0.092
103
0.012
<.001
0.001
32.263
.004
56.607
Dyspnea
11
0.383
0.246 to 0.520
409
0.070
<.001
0.051
351.966
<.001
97.159
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Number of studies.
Number of patients.
Heterogeneity P value.
Figure 4
The forest plots of the incidence of clinical features. A, Fever; (B) cough; (C) sore throat; (D) expectoration; (E) chest distress; (F) muscle soreness or fatigue; (G) headache; (H) diarrhea; (I) dyspnea
Meta‐analysis results of the incidence of clinical manifestationsAbbreviation: CI, confidence interval.Number of studies.Number of patients.Heterogeneity P value.The forest plots of the incidence of clinical features. A, Fever; (B) cough; (C) sore throat; (D) expectoration; (E) chest distress; (F) muscle soreness or fatigue; (G) headache; (H) diarrhea; (I) dyspnea
Laboratory tests
The laboratory findings showed leukocytosis in 11.0% (0.070‐0.150), leukopenia in 36.9% (0.146‐0.593), lymphocytopenia in 57.4% (0.410‐0.737), high C‐reactive protein (CRP) in 61.3% (0.451‐0.774), high lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in 57.0% (0.360‐0.780), and high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in 42.2% (0.076‐0.767) (Table 4 and Figure 5).
Table 4
Meta‐analysis results of the incidence of laboratory tests
The forest plots of the incidence of laboratory test features. A, Leukocytosis; (B) leukopenia; (C) lymphocytopenia; (D) high C‐reactive protein; (E) high lactate dehydrogenase; (F) high erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Meta‐analysis results of the incidence of laboratory testsAbbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CRP, C‐reactive protein; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.Number of studies.Number of patients.Heterogeneity P value.The forest plots of the incidence of laboratory test features. A, Leukocytosis; (B) leukopenia; (C) lymphocytopenia; (D) high C‐reactive protein; (E) high lactate dehydrogenase; (F) high erythrocyte sedimentation rate
Imaging features
At the chest computed tomography (CT), the pneumonia compromise was predominantly bilateral in 75.5% (0.639‐0.871) and unilateral 20.4% (0.106‐0.302). The most common patterns on chest CT were ground‐glass (69.9%, 0.602‐0.796), followed by irregular or halo sign (54.4%, 0.255‐0.833), air bronchogram (51.3%, 0.326‐0.701), bronchovascular bundle thickening (39.5%, 0.082‐0.708), grid‐form shadow (24.4%, 0.116‐0.371), and hydrothorax (18.5%, 0.001‐0.370) (Table 5 and Figure 6).
Table 5
Meta‐analysis results of the incidence of chest imaging
Variable
Na
Estimate
95% CI
Nb
Standard error
P
T2
Q
Pc
I2
Unilateral
19
0.204
0.106‐0.302
522
0.050
<.001
0.043
751.641
<.001
97.605
Bilateral
21
0.755
0.639‐0.871
1196
0.059
<.001
0.068
1582.357
<.001
98.736
Lung consolidation
9
0.369
0.215‐0.523
122
0.079
<.001
0.050
96.579
<.001
91.717
Ground‐glass
21
0.699
0.602‐0.796
1413
0.049
<.001
0.047
1482.862
<.001
98.651
Air bronchogram
6
0.513
0.326‐0.701
119
0.096
<.001
0.048
49.183
<.001
89.834
Grid‐form shadow
6
0.244
0.116‐0.371
64
0.065
<.001
0.022
39.574
<.001
87.365
Bronchovascular bundles thickening
4
0.395
0.082‐0.708
41
0.160
.013
0.097
68.065
<.001
95.592
Hydrothorax
7
0.185
0.001‐0.370
23
0.094
.049
0.059
281.788
<.001
97.871
Irregular or halo sign
5
0.544
0.255‐0.833
107
0.148
<.001
0.104
105.731
<.001
96.217
Abbreviation: CI, confidence interval.
Number of studies.
Number of patients.
Heterogeneity P value.
Figure 6
The forest plots of the incidence of imaging features. A, Unilateral; (B) bilateral; (C) lung consolidation; (D) ground‐glass; (E) air bronchogram; (F) grid‐form shadow; (G) bronchovascular bundles thickening; (H) hydrothorax; (I) irregular or halo sign
Meta‐analysis results of the incidence of chest imagingAbbreviation: CI, confidence interval.Number of studies.Number of patients.Heterogeneity P value.The forest plots of the incidence of imaging features. A, Unilateral; (B) bilateral; (C) lung consolidation; (D) ground‐glass; (E) air bronchogram; (F) grid‐form shadow; (G) bronchovascular bundles thickening; (H) hydrothorax; (I) irregular or halo sign
Complications and outcomes
Among the infected patients, severe cases who required intensive care unit (ICU) were 29.3% (0.190‐0.395), and the incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was 28.8% (0.147‐0.429), that of acute cardiac injury was 14.1% (0.079‐0.204), that of acute renal injury was 7.1% (0.031‐0.110), that of shock was 4.7% (0.009‐0.086), that of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) was 8.5% (−0.008 to 0.179), and the case fatality rate was 6.8% (0.044‐0.093) (Table 6 and Figure 7).
Table 6
Meta‐analysis results of the incidence of complications
The forest plots of the incidence of complication. A, acute respiratory distress syndrome; (B) acute cardiac injury; (C) acute renal injury; (D) shock; (E) multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; (F) mortality
Meta‐analysis results of the incidence of complicationsAbbreviations: ACI, acute cardiac injury; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ARI, acute renal injury; CI, confidence interval; MODS, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome.Number of studies.Number of patients.Heterogeneity P value.The forest plots of the incidence of complication. A, acute respiratory distress syndrome; (B) acute cardiac injury; (C) acute renal injury; (D) shock; (E) multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; (F) mortality
DISCUSSION
The results of this study showed that fever (87.3%) and cough (58.1%) were the main clinical manifestations in the patients with NCP in China. This was followed by dyspnea (38.3%), myalgia or weakness (35.5%), and chest tightness (31.2%), and some patients also presented other clinical symptoms such as chills, cough, conjunctival discomfort, headache, shortness of breath, and joint pain. A few patients had nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and other abdominal discomfort symptoms, whereas very few patients showed hemoptysis symptoms. Most patients with NCP required hospitalization, of which 29.3% required intensive care. The main complications are respiratory failure, ARDS (28.8%) and multiple organ failure (8.5%), and heart failure, shock, renal injury, sepsis, striated muscle lysis, and diffuse intravascular coagulation are rare. According to the severity, the patients with NCP can be divided into mild, normal type (80%), medium type, and severe type (13.8%). The clinical manifestations of patients with different severity vary greatly. According to statistics, the fatality rate in China is about 3.8%,
lower than that of SARS (9.6%) and MERS (35%). The main causes of death are massive alveolar damage and progressive respiratory failure. Generally, viral pneumonia mainly involves pulmonary interstitium, producing pulmonary interstitial fibrosis. The autopsy report of the first NCP patient in China found that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) mainly caused the inflammatory response characterized by deep airway and alveolar damage, accompanied by a large amount of viscous secretions in the airway. The pulmonary transparent membrane became less obvious, and the degree of fibrosis was not as severe as SARS.
However, the degree of effect of COVID‐19 on pulmonary fibrosis still needs to be paid close attention, which is also an important factor influencing pulmonary function in the prognosis of patients with NCP.In this meta‐analysis, white blood cells were normal or decreased in most patients, lymphocytes were mostly decreased, and CRP, LDH, ESR level was elevated in some patients. A few patients had elevated creatine kinase procalcitonin bilirubin, whereas some had decreased albumin and elevated ALT, AST. The pathological results of patients with SARS‐COV‐2 suggested that the excessive activation of T lymphocytes, which is characterized by increased Th17 cells and high toxicity of CD8+ T cells, has caused severe immune damage to a certain extent.
This may be the main reason for the loss of lymphocytes in patients. Sequence comparison analysis showed that the S spike protein of SARS‐COV‐2 contains a SARS‐CoV‐like receptor binding domain, which indicates that ACE2 may be the main receptor of SARS‐COV‐2.
ACE2 was highly expressed in gastric and testicular epithelial cells, and also enriched in colon, heart, kidney, and so on. Over‐expressed ACE2 may be related to the elevated liver enzyme.
The similarity of SARS‐COV‐2 and SARS‐CoV gene sequences suggests that the mechanism of action may also be similar. SARS‐COV‐2 enters host cells through dense S protein,
,
acts on bronchial epithelial cells through ACE2 receptor, and then infects other cells, causing a series of immune responses or inflammatory cytokine storm in severe cases. In addition, the sequence alignment showed that the SARS‐COV‐2 and SARS‐CoV S2 subunits are highly conserved, and the overall identity in the HR1 and HR2 domains is 92.6% and 100%, respectively. This suggested that novel coronary pneumonia drugs research may base on this site.In imaging results, this meta‐analysis showed that 75.7% of the patients had lesions involving both lungs, and 69.9% showed ground‐glass shadows on imaging, mostly interstitial pulmonary lesions. Chest CT showed consolidation shadow nodular or patchy shadow in some patients, whereas there also existed other characteristics in few patients, such as chest‐shaped shadows, thick cord‐like shadows, pleural reactions, thickened blood vessels, pleural effusion, and bronchial inflation, subpleural line, halo sign, antihalo sign, mosaic sign, and so on. The course of the critically ill patient progressed rapidly, and chest CT could cause “white lung” changes within a few days. Because the sensitivity of nucleic acid test is closely related to the detection sample and testing the sample of lower respiratory tract is more sensitive,
nucleic acid test shows partial false negative result. Chest CT examination, as an important examination method for NCP, is highly sensitive to SARS‐COV‐2 (even up to 97% in epidemic areas) and is an important supplement to nucleic acid detection.
In patients with negative nucleic acid test reports, chest CT results are still of high auxiliary diagnostic value. In addition, imaging manifestations of patients also show dynamic evolution in the course of disease progression.Current research showed that COVID‐19, which source may be Chinese chrysanthemum head bats and pangolin may be a potential intermediate host, can cause a zoonotic disease.
Since late February 2020, the number of confirmed cases of NCP abroad has increased rapidly, which may indicate a pandemic. The “three early” principle (early detection, early diagnosis, and early treatment) followed by disease prevention and treatment is particularly important in the prevention and treatment of SARS‐COV‐2. In addition, the clinical manifestations of patients with neocoronary pneumonia are diverse and the atypical symptoms also account for part of the proportion. Therefore, we systematically analyzed the clinical manifestations and auxiliary examination results of patients with COVID‐19, so as to reflect the disease characteristics more comprehensively, increase the discrimination of the disease, and strive for early diagnosis, early isolation, and early treatment.The number of newly diagnosed cases of NCP has been rising worldwide recently, especially in South Korea, Italy, Iran, and Japan. To control the further spread of the epidemic, it is still necessary to strictly follow the management measures for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases and follow the WHO declaration on public health emergencies of international concern. Certainly, prevention of imported cases is also extremely important.
Particularly, in some densely populated markets, stations, large ports, and other places, protective deployment measures should be strengthened to ensure that protective equipment, drugs, medical supplies, and so on are sufficient.
National public health capabilities and infrastructure remain at the core of global health security, as they are the first line of defense for infectious disease emergencies.
The International Health Organization, all countries, and all humanity need to pay great attention to SARS‐COV‐2.This meta‐analysis, with large enough sample size, relatively high literature quality, and more comprehensive analysis, included a total of 31 literature studies, including 46 959 patients with NCP. The conclusions are very credible to some extent. This article still has the following limitations, for example, (a) the samples are domestic cases, without foreign cases; (b) different data sources may lead to some bias in the results; and (c) there exists some publication bias. Therefore, the conclusions of this article need to be further verified.
CONCLUSION
COVID‐19 is a new clinical infectious disease, which mainly causes bilateral pneumonia and lung function deteriorates rapidly. Nearly a third of patients need to be admitted to the ICU, and patients are likely to present respiratory failure or even death.
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interests.
Authors: Daniel K W Chu; Yang Pan; Samuel M S Cheng; Kenrie P Y Hui; Pavithra Krishnan; Yingzhi Liu; Daisy Y M Ng; Carrie K C Wan; Peng Yang; Quanyi Wang; Malik Peiris; Leo L M Poon Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: Qun Li; Xuhua Guan; Peng Wu; Xiaoye Wang; Lei Zhou; Yeqing Tong; Ruiqi Ren; Kathy S M Leung; Eric H Y Lau; Jessica Y Wong; Xuesen Xing; Nijuan Xiang; Yang Wu; Chao Li; Qi Chen; Dan Li; Tian Liu; Jing Zhao; Man Liu; Wenxiao Tu; Chuding Chen; Lianmei Jin; Rui Yang; Qi Wang; Suhua Zhou; Rui Wang; Hui Liu; Yinbo Luo; Yuan Liu; Ge Shao; Huan Li; Zhongfa Tao; Yang Yang; Zhiqiang Deng; Boxi Liu; Zhitao Ma; Yanping Zhang; Guoqing Shi; Tommy T Y Lam; Joseph T Wu; George F Gao; Benjamin J Cowling; Bo Yang; Gabriel M Leung; Zijian Feng Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Luís Eduardo Santos Paz; Bruno José da Silva Bezerra; Taciane Machado de Melo Pereira; Welma Emidio da Silva Journal: Rev Bras Med Trab Date: 2021-04-30
Authors: Oscar H Del Brutto; Aldo F Costa; Robertino M Mera; Bettsy Y Recalde; Javier A Bustos; Héctor H García Journal: Pathog Glob Health Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Gustavo Nino; Jonathan Zember; Ramon Sanchez-Jacob; Maria J Gutierrez; Karun Sharma; Marius George Linguraru Journal: Pediatr Pulmonol Date: 2020-11-02
Authors: Trishnika Chakraborty; Rizwana Fathima Jamal; Gopi Battineni; Kavalipurapu Venkata Teja; Carlos Miguel Marto; Gianrico Spagnuolo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 3.390