Alaina D Geary1, Luise I M Pernar2, Jason F Hall1. 1. Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: alaina.geary@bmc.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Develop and describe a set of low-cost hemorrhoidectomy task trainer prototypes in the setting of inadequate junior resident surgical skill preparation for anorectal cases. DESIGN: This is a study comparing expert and novice performance and opinions. Three task trainers were developed to simulate dissecting, knot-tying, and suturing in a confined space, like the anus. Participants were asked to dissect the peel off of an orange, tie seven 2-handed knots on a weight, and close a defect in a piece of felt with a running stitch. An 8-oz mason jar was used to simulate the confined space. Participants were asked to fill out a 5-point Likert-based evaluation regarding the skills. The primary outcome was time to complete each task in seconds. Secondary outcome measures were number of errors associated with each task, subjective achievability of tasks, and utility of tasks for improving surgical skills. SETTING: General surgery residency program at a safety-net academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Forty subjects participated in this study. There were 20 experts (7 attending surgeons, 13 PGY-1-PGY-5 surgical residents) and 20 novices (11 third- and 9 fourth-year medical students). RESULTS: Experts knot-tied (59s vs 140s, p < 0.001) and sutured (219s vs 295s, p < 0.001) faster than novices. Experts were able to tie 7 knots in fewer attempts than novices (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in speed of orange dissection between groups. There were no significant differences in the number or frequency of other errors. All participants felt the tasks were achievable (4.90/5) and would be useful in improving skills (4.93/5). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a set of low-cost, low-fidelity prototypical hemorrhoidectomy task trainers can discriminate between experts and novices. Simulation models such as these can offer useful practice opportunities for junior general surgery trainees.
OBJECTIVE: Develop and describe a set of low-cost hemorrhoidectomy task trainer prototypes in the setting of inadequate junior resident surgical skill preparation for anorectal cases. DESIGN: This is a study comparing expert and novice performance and opinions. Three task trainers were developed to simulate dissecting, knot-tying, and suturing in a confined space, like the anus. Participants were asked to dissect the peel off of an orange, tie seven 2-handed knots on a weight, and close a defect in a piece of felt with a running stitch. An 8-oz mason jar was used to simulate the confined space. Participants were asked to fill out a 5-point Likert-based evaluation regarding the skills. The primary outcome was time to complete each task in seconds. Secondary outcome measures were number of errors associated with each task, subjective achievability of tasks, and utility of tasks for improving surgical skills. SETTING: General surgery residency program at a safety-net academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Forty subjects participated in this study. There were 20 experts (7 attending surgeons, 13 PGY-1-PGY-5 surgical residents) and 20 novices (11 third- and 9 fourth-year medical students). RESULTS: Experts knot-tied (59s vs 140s, p < 0.001) and sutured (219s vs 295s, p < 0.001) faster than novices. Experts were able to tie 7 knots in fewer attempts than novices (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in speed of orange dissection between groups. There were no significant differences in the number or frequency of other errors. All participants felt the tasks were achievable (4.90/5) and would be useful in improving skills (4.93/5). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that a set of low-cost, low-fidelity prototypical hemorrhoidectomy task trainers can discriminate between experts and novices. Simulation models such as these can offer useful practice opportunities for junior general surgery trainees.