Literature DB >> 32240822

Combined local impedance and contact force for radiofrequency ablation assessment.

Kara Garrott1, Jacob Laughner1, Sarah Gutbrod1, Alan Sugrue2, Allan Shuros1, Matt Sulkin1, Omar Yasin2, Jamie Bush1, Nathan Pottinger1, Jason Meyers3, Suraj Kapa4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The combination of contact force (CF) and local impedance (LI) may improve tissue characterization and lesion prediction during radiofrequency (RF) ablation.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of LI combined with CF in assessing RF ablation efficacy.
METHODS: An LI catheter with CF sensing was evaluated in swine (n = 11) and in vitro (n = 14). The relationship between LI and CF in different tissue types was evaluated in vivo. Discrete lesions were created in vitro and in vivo at a range of forces, powers, and durations. Finally, an intercaval line was created in 3 groups at 30 W: 30s, Δ20Ω, and Δ30Ω. In the Δ20Ω and Δ30Ω groups, the user ablated until a 20 or 30 Ω LI drop. In the 30s group, the user was blinded to LI.
RESULTS: In vivo, distinction in LI was found between the blood pool and the myocardium (blood pool: 122 ± 7.02 Ω; perpendicular contact: 220 ± 29 Ω; parallel contact: 207 ± 31 Ω). LI drop correlated with lesion depth both in vitro (R = 0.84) and in vivo (R = 0.79), informing sufficient lesion creation (LI drop >20 Ω) and warning of excessive heating (LI drop >65 Ω). When creating an intercaval line, the total RF time was significantly reduced when using LI guidance (6.4 ± 2 minutes in Δ20Ω and 8.1 ± 1 minutes in Δ30Ω) compared with a standard 30-second workflow (18 ± 7 minutes). Acute conduction block was achieved in all Δ30Ω and 30s lines.
CONCLUSION: The addition of LI to CF provides feedback on both electrical and mechanical loads. This provides information on tissue type and catheter-tissue coupling; provides feedback on whether volumetric tissue heating is inadequate, sufficient, or excessive; and reduces ablation time.
Copyright © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ablation; Contact force; Electroanatomic mapping; Impedance; Radiofrequency

Year:  2020        PMID: 32240822     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  8 in total

1.  Improved Ablation Efficiency in PVI Guided by Contact Force and Local Impedance: Chronic Canine Model.

Authors:  Sarah R Gutbrod; Allan Shuros; Vijay Koya; Michelle Alexander-Curtis; Lauren Lehn; Kimberly Miklos; John Paul Mounsey; Jason D Meyers
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  Polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography monitoring of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation in left atrium of living swine.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zhao; Ohad Ziv; Reza Mohammadpour; Benjamin Crosby; Walter J Hoyt; Michael W Jenkins; Christopher Snyder; Christine Hendon; Kenneth R Laurita; Andrew M Rollins
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Local impedance measurements during contact force-guided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation for predicting an effective radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Takehito Sasaki; Kohki Nakamura; Kentaro Minami; Yutaka Take; Yosuke Nakatani; Yuko Miki; Koji Goto; Kenichi Kaseno; Eiji Yamashita; Keiko Koyama; Shigeto Naito
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-02-04

4.  Role of catheter location on local impedance measurements and clinical outcome with the new direct sense technology in cardiac ablation procedures.

Authors:  E Pesch; L Riesinger; N Vonderlin; J Kupusovic; M Koehler; F Bruns; R A Janosi; S Kochhäuser; D Dobrev; T Rassaf; R Wakili; J Siebermair
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-09-08

5.  Performance and acute procedural outcomes of the EnSite Precision™ cardiac mapping system for electrophysiology mapping and ablation procedures: results from the EnSite Precision™ observational study.

Authors:  Jonathan C Hsu; Douglas Darden; Benedict M Glover; B Judson Colley; Christian Steinberg; Bernard Thibault; Coty Jewell; Michael Bernard; Paul B Tabereaux; Usman Siddiqui; Jingyun Li; Eric E Horvath; Daniel Cooper; David Lin
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 1.759

6.  Derivation and Verification of the Relationship between Ablation Index and Baseline Impedance.

Authors:  Zheng Cai; Sainan Li; Qi Zhang; Chenyuan Wang; Zhen Jin; Ming Fu; Shuai Zhang; Ming Liang; Zulu Wang; Yaling Han
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 1.866

Review 7.  When local impedance meets contact force: preliminary experience from the CHARISMA registry.

Authors:  Francesco Solimene; Valerio De Sanctis; Ruggero Maggio; Maurizio Malacrida; Luca Segreti; Matteo Anselmino; Vincenzo Schillaci; Massimo Mantica; Marco Scaglione; Antonio Dello Russo; Filippo Maria Cauti; Gianluca Zingarini; Claudio Pandozi; Marco Cavaiani; Anna Ferraro; Giampiero Maglia; Giuseppe Stabile
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 1.759

8.  Change in the local impedance and electrograms recorded by a micro-electrode tip catheter during initial atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Kenji Hashimoto; Ippei Tsuzuki; Yuta Seki; Susumu Ibe; Terumasa Yamashita; Hiroshi Miyama; Taishi Fujisawa; Yoshinori Katsumata; Takehiro Kimura; Keiichi Fukuda; Seiji Takatsuki
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-04-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.