| Literature DB >> 32239661 |
Jung Nam An1, Lilin Li2,3, Junghun Lee4, Seung-Shin Yu4, Jeonghwan Lee5, Yong Chul Kim6, Dong Ki Kim2,6, Yun Kyu Oh2,5, Chun Soo Lim2,5, Yon Su Kim2,6, Sunyoung Kim4, Seung Hee Yang7,8, Jung Pyo Lee2,5.
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a very common complication with high morbidity and mortality rates and no fundamental treatment. In this study, we investigated whether the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/cMet pathway is associated with the development of AKI and how the administration of a cMet agonistic antibody (Ab) affects an AKI model. In the analysis using human blood samples, cMet and HGF levels were found to be significantly increased in the AKI group, regardless of underlying renal function. The administration of a cMet agonistic Ab improved the functional and histological changes after bilateral ischaemia-reperfusion injury. TUNEL-positive cells and Bax/Bcl-2 ratio were also reduced by cMet agonistic Ab treatment. In addition, cMet agonistic Ab treatment significantly increased the levels of PI3K, Akt and mTOR. Furthermore, after 24 hours of hypoxia induction in human proximal tubular epithelial cells, treatment with the cMet agonistic Ab also showed dose-dependent antiapoptotic effects similar to those of the recombinant HGF treatment. Even when the HGF axis was blocked with a HGF-blocking Ab, the cMet agonistic Ab showed an independent dose-dependent antiapoptotic effect. In conclusion, cMet expression is associated with the occurrence of AKI. cMet agonistic Ab treatment attenuates the severity of AKI through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and improves apoptosis. cMet agonistic Ab may have important significance for the treatment of AKI.Entities:
Keywords: PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway; acute kidney injury; apoptosis; cMet agonistic antibody
Year: 2020 PMID: 32239661 PMCID: PMC7214182 DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15225
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Mol Med ISSN: 1582-1838 Impact factor: 5.310
FIGURE 1Plasma cMet levels are associated with the occurrence of AKI. (A) The cMet level was measured in forty‐eight AKI and twenty‐four control patient plasma samples. The patients diagnosed with AKI had higher plasma cMet levels than those in the control group (***P < .001). (B) Plasma HGF concentrations were also different between the two groups (***P < .001). All measurements were performed in a blinded manner in duplicate. The results are expressed as the median (interquartile ranges) and were compared with the Mann‐Whitney U test
Baseline characteristics
| Acute kidney injury (n = 48) | No acute kidney injury (n = 24) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex | 29 (60.4) | 17 (70.8) | .386 |
| Age (y) | 61 (48, 74) | 71 (57, 76) | .203 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 23.3 (20.8, 27.1) | 24.1 (22.0, 27.0) | .591 |
| Baseline sCr (mg/dL) | 0.98 (0.71, 1.50) | 0.83 (0.73, 0.93) | .057 |
| Baseline MDRD‐GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 72.7 (43.0, 105.2) | 85.5 (77.7, 91.2) | .068 |
| Chronic kidney disease | .030 | ||
| Stage 1 | 12 (25.0) | 8 (33.3) | |
| Stage 2 | 13 (27.1) | 16 (66.7) | |
| Stage 3 | 12 (25.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Stage 4 | 3 (6.2) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Unknown | 8 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Hypertension | 25 (52.1) | 15 (62.5) | .402 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 21 (43.8) | 7 (29.2) | .231 |
| Liver disease | 10 (20.8) | 1 (4.2) | .064 |
| Systolic BP (mm Hg) | 107 (92, 125) | 139 (117, 166) | <.001 |
| Serum creatinine (mg/dL) | 2.65 (1.82, 3.83) | 0.99 (0.84, 1.12) | <.001 |
| MDRD‐GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 21.5 (15.2, 36.0) | 73.7 (56.9, 84.4) | <.001 |
| Plasma cMet (ng/mL) | 475.0 (385.9, 616.7) | 371.9 (302.3, 421.3) | <.001 |
| Plasma HGF (pg/mL) | 5659.2 (3533.1, 10 757.7) | 353.4 (32.8, 958.6) | <.001 |
The data are presented as the median (25th and 75th percentiles) or as a number (percentage, %).
Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; sCr, serum creatinine.
FIGURE 2cMet agonistic Ab treatment attenuates the severity of AKI. (A) Functional data. After bilateral IRI induction, BUN and sCr levels steadily increased and peaked at 48 h. However, the values were significantly lower in the cMet agonistic antibody‐injected group than the IRI group (**P < .01; n = 10/group). (B) PAS stain. After 48 h of disease induction, tubular necrosis and inflammation were less extensive in the cMet agonistic antibody‐injected group than the bilateral IRI group (n = 10/group; ***P < .001; magnification: 100×). The data are shown as the mean ± SEM and were compared using Student's t test
FIGURE 3cMet agonistic Ab treatment improves apoptosis in AKI. (A) TUNEL assay. The percentage of TUNEL‐positive cells was significantly decreased in the cMet agonistic Ab‐injected group compared with the bilateral IRI group (n = 10/group; ***P < .001; magnification: 400×). (B) Apoptosis in GEnCs. The IRI group showed the decrease in CD31 expression and the increase in the expression of cleaved caspase‐3 and p‐P21. However, in the mice treated with cMet agonistic Ab, CD31 expression was enhanced and the expression of cleaved caspase‐3 or p‐P21 was decreased (magnification: 400×, 1000×). (C) Bax/Bcl‐2 ratio. The Bax/Bcl‐2 ratio was increased in the IRI group and markedly decreased in the cMet agonistic Ab‐treated group (n = 10/group; *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P < .001). (D) The band of representative samples and quantification of results showed that IL‐1β, p‐P38 and P38 expression was elevated in the IRI group compared with the control group and prominently attenuated by pre‐treatment with the cMet agonistic Ab. In contrast, E‐cadherin expression showed the opposite result. All data are shown as the mean ± SEM and compared using Student's t test (n = 10/group; *P < .05, **P < .01). The results shown are one of three independent experiments with the same trend
FIGURE 4cMet agonistic Ab treatment activates the PI3K/Akt pathway. The IRI group showed significantly decreased levels of PI3K, Akt and mTOR compared to the sham group. In contrast, the levels of these proteins were markedly increased by cMet agonistic Ab treatment. All data are shown as the mean ± SEM and compared using Student's t test (n = 10/group; *P < .05). The results shown are one of three independent experiments with the same trend
FIGURE 5Effects of cMet agonistic Ab treatment on apoptosis in in vitro study. (A) The treatment of hPTECs with the cMet agonistic Ab increased the level of p‐cMet, suggesting that this antibody is functional in hPTECs. (B) Antiapoptotic effect of cMet agonistic Ab treatment. In hypoxia‐injured hPTECs, the apoptosis rate was higher than that in the control hPTECs. Treatment with the cMet agonistic Ab again reduced the proportion of apoptotic cells to a level comparable with that of rHGF treatment (**P < .01, ***P < .001). (C) cMet agonistic Ab is also effective when cells are treated with an HGF‐blocking antibody. After hypoxic stimulation and treatment with the cMet agonistic Ab, the percentage of apoptotic cells decreased dose‐dependently to a level comparable with that of rHGF treatment. The increase in the proportion of apoptotic cells after treatment with an HGF‐blocking antibody significantly decreased after cMet agonistic antibody treatment. These results are representative of one of three independent experiments
FIGURE 6Annexin V/propidium iodide staining assay. (A) In the hypoxic condition of hPTECs, apoptotic cells decreased under the cMet agonistic Ab treatment compared with those under human IgG control treatment; however, when treated with cMet blocking Ab, apoptotic cells showed an increased pattern compared to the Goat IgG control (**P < .01). (B) Treatment of cMet agonistic Ab to GEnCs also significantly reduced apoptotic cells; in contrast, the increased apoptotic cells under hypoxia significantly decreased following the treatment of the cMet blocking Ab (*P < .05, ***P < .001). These results are representative of one of three independent experiments