Literature DB >> 32239292

Overall and subgroup specific performance of the pediatric index of mortality 2 score in Switzerland: a national multicenter study.

Angelo Polito1, Caroline Giacobino2, Christophe Combescure2, Yann Levy-Jamet3, Peter Rimensberger3.   

Abstract

Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) 2 score is used in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) to predict the patients' risk of death. The performance of this model has never been assessed in Switzerland. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the PIM2 score in the whole cohort and in pre-specified diagnostic subgroups of patients admitted to PICUs in Switzerland. All children younger than 16 years admitted to any PICU in Switzerland between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2017 were included in the study. A total of 22,382 patients were analyzed. Observed mortality was 2%, whereas mortality predicted by PIM2 was 4.2% (SMR = 0.47, 95% CI, 0.42-0.52). Calibration was also poor across the deciles of mortality risks (p < 0.001). The AUC-ROC for the entire cohort was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87-0.90). Calibration varied significantly according to primary diagnosis.
Conclusion: The performance of the PIM 2 score in a cohort of Swiss patients is poor with adequate discrimination and poor calibration. The PIM 2 score tends to under predict the number of deaths among septic patients and in patients admitted after a cardiorespiratory arrest. What is Known: •PIM2 score is a widely used mortality prediction model in PICU. •PIM2 performance among uncommon but clinically relevant diagnostic subgroups of patients is unknown. •The performance of PIM2 score has never been assessed in Switzerland. What is New: •The performance of the PIM 2 score in a cohort of Swiss patients is poor with adequate discrimination and poor calibration. •Calibration varies significantly according to primary diagnosis. The PIM 2 score under predict the number of deaths among septic patients and in patients admitted after a cardiorespiratory arrest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Outcome/quality measure; Pediatric intensive care unit; Risk of mortality; Standardized mortality ratio; Validation studies

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32239292     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-020-03639-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  14 in total

Review 1.  Severity scoring in the critically ill: part 1--interpretation and accuracy of outcome prediction scoring systems.

Authors:  Michael J Breslow; Omar Badawi
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Severity of illness scoring systems in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Mark T Keegan; Ognjen Gajic; Bekele Afessa
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 3.  Why try to predict ICU outcomes?

Authors:  G Sarah Power; David A Harrison
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.687

4.  The parsimonious pediatric index of mortality*.

Authors:  James P Marcin; Randall C Wetzel
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.624

5.  Effect of changing patient mix on the performance of an intensive care unit severity-of-illness model: how to distinguish a general from a specialty intensive care unit.

Authors:  R Murphy-Filkins; D Teres; S Lemeshow; D W Hosmer
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  The suitability of the Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM), PIM2, the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), and PRISM III for monitoring the quality of pediatric intensive care in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Anthony Slater; Frank Shann
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.624

7.  PIM2: a revised version of the Paediatric Index of Mortality.

Authors:  Anthony Slater; Frank Shann; Gale Pearson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  The ANZPIC registry diagnostic codes: a system for coding reasons for admitting children to intensive care.

Authors:  Anthony Slater; Frank Shann; Julie McEniery
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Mortality prediction using SAPS II: an update for French intensive care units.

Authors:  Jean Roger Le Gall; Anke Neumann; François Hemery; Jean Pierre Bleriot; Jean Pierre Fulgencio; Bernard Garrigues; Christian Gouzes; Eric Lepage; Pierre Moine; Daniel Villers
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-10-06       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Performance of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 Score in PICUs in Argentina: A Prospective, National Multicenter Study.

Authors:  María Del P Arias López; Nancy Boada; Analía Fernández; Ariel L Fernández; María E Ratto; Alejandro Siaba Serrate; Eduardo Schnitzler
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.624

View more
  1 in total

1.  Administrative data in pediatric critical care research-Potential, challenges, and future directions.

Authors:  Nora Bruns; Anna-Lisa Sorg; Ursula Felderhoff-Müser; Christian Dohna-Schwake; Andreas Stang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.569

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.